What happened to Tucker

S

StmarysCity79

Well-Known Member
SamSpade said:
And what gets me is, the left-wing press is ABLAZE and simply irate that Tucker would "misrepresent" what "actually" took place.

No, idiots - he is showing video that many did not get a chance to see, such as the LAWYERS for these guys. Withholding exculpatory evidence is a serious crime, and the J6 committee didn't even blink about it.

Others have cried foul over it as "lies" when all it is - is actual video. Not doctored, and certainly not seriously EDITED such as the one the left has shown of Josh Hawley running down the hall - when he is merely the last of SEVERAL DOZEN who ran past seconds prior. For the leftie press to JUST SHOW those two seconds without showing the previous fifteen seconds' worth - THAT is lying.
Click to expand...


So how is that a lie?

They showed him running down the hall to safety. Are you saying that didn't happen?

After he was seen cheering on the very same attackers?

Do you even know what argument you are trying to make or merely parroting crap you hear that makes no sense
 
BOP

BOP

Well-Known Member
vraiblonde said:
We have short attention spans, so if he goes to podcast he'll drop off the earth like Bill O'Reilly did.

Tucker is just an employee. He probably has some input but mostly has people who tell him what he can and cannot talk about. Corporate executives are notorious cowards, thin skinned crybabies who crumble into little pieces at the slightest criticism, even if it comes from a crank lunatic. They will cheerfully lose their audience and sink into irrelevancy rather than piss off the hysterical crazies (including their fellow media tards).

They also want money. They don't care a fig about the viewer - all they care about is how much money they can rake in. So if, say, a foreign entity said, "Hey, we'll give you half a billion dollars if you say this and don't say that," they'll roll over so fast it'll give you whiplash just watching them.

We're getting closer to the 2024 election, and Trump is in the forefront of the news like he always is. The overlords want him ignored and marginalized, but he's too big for that. When only Fox would give him a fair shake, audiences flocked to Fox and ratings for the other nets swirled in the toilet. So the obvious solution is to stop Fox from giving him press. And bribes are the obvious method of control.

Tucker doesn't need a job. He's made so much money over the course of his career that unless he's flinging it around like a drunken Saudi King's son he should be set for life. He can walk away no problem. It's the American people who suffer because our news will consist of propaganda and we'll never have any idea what's going on in this country, which is the whole idea behind silencing news networks like Fox.
Click to expand...
As Vicki Abt and Leonard Mustazza, as well as many others have written, back in the '90s: the audience is the product. How prescient all of them were.
 
TPD

TPD

the poor dad
O’Keefe confirms thru FoxNews producer that Tucker was let go as part of the settlement with Dominion and the Murdochs silenced him on the J6 news.





 
SamSpade

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
And now...

www.dailywire.com

Fox News Replaces Its Entire Primetime Lineup, Names 3 New Shows: Report

Fox News is reportedly set to replace its entire primetime lineup with three of the network’s biggest hosts, according to a new report. The Drudge Report reported Wednesday morning that Fox News host Sean Hannity will take over Tucker Carlson’s 8 p.m. time slot, while Greg Gutfeld and Jesse...
www.dailywire.com www.dailywire.com

Might be behind a pay wall for some of you. In any event, they're shifting the schedule around, but not apparently with any new players.
Sean gets Tucker's slot - and Jesse and Greg get moved to Prime Time.

Everything about this sounds like panic - and stupid. Sean has NEVER had the show worthy of people turning it on, first thing - it has always depended on leftover audience from the previous show, whether it was O'Reilly or Tucker. I almost never watch him, because he's just a right-wing version of the leftie shows I can't stand - lots of people who agree with Sean, him talking over them, repeating the same phrases over and over again. I only ever listened to his radio show for one thing he had, over the rest - GUESTS. Sean always had the best guests, Rush usually had none.

Jesse is not ready for prime time. He's no longer the talking parrot idiot I saw back when he started.

That leaves Greg, and I hate to say it, but as poignant and precise as he can be - he's MOSTLY great for injecting comedy into his shows, from RedEye to Gutfeld. He's hysterical on The Five, but he's one part of a panel.

This - this is bad. This is worse than stuffing Megyn in for Bill.
 
SamSpade

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
TPD said:
O’Keefe confirms thru FoxNews producer that Tucker was let go as part of the settlement with Dominion and the Murdochs silenced him on the J6 news.





Click to expand...

You know what got me - besides the fact that this undercover bit may have doomed this journalist's career -

Is - he knew all this. And I suspect - a LOT of journalists know this stuff. Which means the slanted, biased crap they write is NOT just their own bias seeping through - it means, day in, day out, they craft new ways to skew the news any way they please. They have NO INTENTION of reporting the facts - hence, this journalist who knew lots of details not disclosed to the public, but never wrote about it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TPD
Bann

Bann

Doris Day meets Lady Gaga
PREMO Member
...but wait! there's more - when I clicked on Drudge's headline link a few minutes ago -

this is the story that it lead to. Nothing is really set - it sounds like a lot of rumors, IMO.
variety.com

Fox News Mulls Primetime Changes After Tucker Carlson Exit

Fox News Channel is considering 'multiple scenarios' in primetime following the exit of 8 pm anchor Tucker Carlson
variety.com variety.com
 
SamSpade

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
Bann said:
...but wait! there's more - when I clicked on Drudge's headline link a few minutes ago -

this is the story that it lead to. Nothing is really set - it sounds like a lot of rumors, IMO.
variety.com

Fox News Mulls Primetime Changes After Tucker Carlson Exit

Fox News Channel is considering 'multiple scenarios' in primetime following the exit of 8 pm anchor Tucker Carlson
variety.com variety.com
Click to expand...
Well, who WOULD you put in Tucker's slot? They've tried some of their other guest players, and they don't draw.
Not Kayliegh, not Brian - no one has what Tucker had. So they do the single stupidest thing I can think of - slide Sean in an hour earlier.
Which essentially ERASES that show at 8.

They're going to have to go outside the existing FOX framework for a host, because the substitutes aren't doing it, and the audience wants someone with the balls to go outside the norm. And right now, the suits won't allow it.

FOX will still make money - but I get the impression that they make the same money whether they have 30% of the audience or 60% of the audience.
 
SamSpade

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
stgislander said:
And why move Gutfeld! to 10pm? His show is perfect for 11pm. He's up against and thrashing all the late night comics. Especially that douche nozzle Colbert.
Click to expand...
Yup. He's perfect at 11. Up against the other networks delivering the same stuff - and beating them. Putting him at 10 has him also competing against prime time shows, which isn't going to be good.
 
Bann

Bann

Doris Day meets Lady Gaga
PREMO Member
I'm not so sure I believe the rumors anyway, there's no point in moving any of them just add somebody to the 8:00 slot. I also have a hard time believing that Hannity would want to move to 8:00.
 
SamSpade

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
Y
Bann said:
I'm not so sure I believe the rumors anyway, there's no point in moving any of them just add somebody to the 8:00 slot. I also have a hard time believing that Hannity would want to move to 8:00.
Click to expand...
You're not wrong. He does occasionally remind viewers that he has a very short time between the end of his radio show and getting ready for the nightly broadcast. Cutting it an hour might be annoying.
 
Monello

Monello

Smarter than the average bear
PREMO Member
SamSpade said:
Yup. He's perfect at 11. Up against the other networks delivering the same stuff - and beating them. Putting him at 10 has him also competing against prime time shows, which isn't going to be good.
Click to expand...
They could double his airtime. Add a few more segments and they can come up with an additional hour of material.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top