Kyder Keltic
New Member
They know what it has to do with it.
It is what makes Democrat a bad word, almost as bad as Republican.
It is what makes Democrat a bad word, almost as bad as Republican.
Where is Rev. Al and Jesse Jackson
- Thread starter AK-74me
- Start date
JPC sr
James P. Cusick Sr.
Scofflaw and Personal Responsibility.
I think my answer to those questions that I already answered in post 14 was quite sufficient indeed.
Click HERE to the link to my post # 14.
Nucklesack said:
I think my answer to those questions that I already answered in post 14 was quite sufficient indeed.Click HERE to the link to my post # 14.
JPC sr
James P. Cusick Sr.
Scofflaw and Personal Responsibility.
I would say that the 2 Reverends see that some thing is very missing in the news report.
The story just does not add up. Five healthy adults do not attack and mutilate a man and woman couple for no reason and making no sense.
It would seem likely that maybe one person committed the atrocities and the police arrested the others in drama or some thing like that.
The story does not say why such a thing happened, or even how it happened as such a crime would not be easy to perform, so too much is left out.
I do not believe the story report is accurate just because it does not make sense.
When Jeffery Domner (prob spelled wrong) but he was found to be killing and eating his homesexual buddies and that had logic to it - sick perverted logic but it still made sense.
This present claim against five healthy adults attacking 2 random victims is not logical.
So I say the 2 Reverends like myself have big doubts about the story.
Kyder Keltic said:
I would say that the 2 Reverends see that some thing is very missing in the news report.The story just does not add up. Five healthy adults do not attack and mutilate a man and woman couple for no reason and making no sense.
It would seem likely that maybe one person committed the atrocities and the police arrested the others in drama or some thing like that.
The story does not say why such a thing happened, or even how it happened as such a crime would not be easy to perform, so too much is left out.
I do not believe the story report is accurate just because it does not make sense.
When Jeffery Domner (prob spelled wrong) but he was found to be killing and eating his homesexual buddies and that had logic to it - sick perverted logic but it still made sense.
This present claim against five healthy adults attacking 2 random victims is not logical.
So I say the 2 Reverends like myself have big doubts about the story.
Toxick
Splat
JPC sr said:
Click HERE to the link to my post # 14.
Clue: He's not looking for information on Tawana Brawley. He's looking to see what you know.
Further clue: If someone is running for office (like you), their potential constituants have a right to try to pick their brain to see what makes them tick.
Hope that helps.
This_person
Well-Known Member
This is another point where you prove your disconnect from reality - human cruelty is real and exists. That you don't understand it is somewhat comforting because you're free and in the open, but it doesn't stop the reality of it.JPC sr said:
The story just does not add up. Five healthy adults do not attack and mutilate a man and woman couple for no reason and making no sense.
It would seem likely that maybe one person committed the atrocities and the police arrested the others in drama or some thing like that.
The story does not say why such a thing happened, or even how it happened as such a crime would not be easy to perform, so too much is left out.
I do not believe the story report is accurate just because it does not make sense.
When Jeffery Domner (prob spelled wrong) but he was found to be killing and eating his homesexual buddies and that had logic to it - sick perverted logic but it still made sense.
This present claim against five healthy adults attacking 2 random victims is not logical.
So I say the 2 Reverends like myself have big doubts about the story.
PsyOps
Pixelated
You’re right it’s not logical. No kind of murder is logical. In fact no kind of crime is logical. The fact that you try to attach some sort of logic to DAHMER is disturbing.JPC sr said:
The story just does not add up. Five healthy adults do not attack and mutilate a man and woman couple for no reason and making no sense.
It would seem likely that maybe one person committed the atrocities and the police arrested the others in drama or some thing like that.
The story does not say why such a thing happened, or even how it happened as such a crime would not be easy to perform, so too much is left out.
I do not believe the story report is accurate just because it does not make sense.
When Jeffery Domner (prob spelled wrong) but he was found to be killing and eating his homesexual buddies and that had logic to it - sick perverted logic but it still made sense.
This present claim against five healthy adults attacking 2 random victims is not logical.
So I say the 2 Reverends like myself have big doubts about the story.
This crime is in the early stages of discovery of facts. So perhaps we ought to wait for that. That’s not really the point here. Sharpton and Jackson have never been ones to wait for discovery of facts to cast their judgment. When it suits their purpose they are on the prowl ready to act as judge jury and executioner. The Tawana Brawley and Duke cases are just a couple of examples. There are plenty of examples out there of Sharpton using much worse language than Imus used, yet in his Reverend-like capacity couldn’t find within his Christian heart to forgive, even though the targets of Imus’ stupid comments did forgive Imus. Where does that leave Sharpton except in a box that is labeled “HYPOCRITE”.
SouthernMdRocks
R.I.P. Bobo, We miss you!
PsyOps said:
In a box labeled nappy headed hypocrite perhaps. :shrug:
SouthernMdRocks
R.I.P. Bobo, We miss you!
PsyOps said:
I know, I tried not to say it but,,,,,
thinkaboutit
New Member
Has this horrible story been reported on television like the O'reilly Factor? I don't watch tv all the time so this is the first I have heard of this crime. There are plenty of white freaks to go around Jeffrey Dahlmer just to name one. This story shouldn't be used to point the finger at all black people just like Dahlmer wouldn't be considered the "norm" for all white people. There are creepy degenerate people in ALL racial, socio-economic, and religious and non-religous groups.
I don't think that's the point of this thread.thinkaboutit said:
Certainly those animals that did that to the couple are not representatives of black America. However, Revs. Sharpton and Jackson take various white animals and try to paint them as representatives for white America. Their hypocrisy is the issue.
thinkaboutit
New Member
I certainly do not defend all of Sharpton's and Jackson's statements over the years. I don't ever recall Sharpton or Jackson commenting on jeffrey dahlmer or gacy for that matter. They are civil rights activists for the minorities and the disenfranchised and it is up to them whether or not they wish to comment on this particular horrendous crime. And as far as hyprocrisy goes there is plenty of that go around in every venue.
Larry Gude
Strung Out
No they are not...
...they are race hustlers and their constituents are the media, their employers are corporations and the only people they are active for are their own business.
You ever hear tapes of a Jesse Jackson speech to inner city folks when there was no major media around? He sounds like Rush Limbaugh; personal responsibility, go to work, work hard and harder, say no to drugs, take care of your women and children, it's up to you.
Not 'it's whiteys fault'.
thinkaboutit said:
...they are race hustlers and their constituents are the media, their employers are corporations and the only people they are active for are their own business.
You ever hear tapes of a Jesse Jackson speech to inner city folks when there was no major media around? He sounds like Rush Limbaugh; personal responsibility, go to work, work hard and harder, say no to drugs, take care of your women and children, it's up to you.
Not 'it's whiteys fault'.
thinkaboutit
New Member
Sharpton & Jackson didn't start off as "race hustlers", Jackson was next to Martin Luther King during the civil rights movement. They have a stake in the media because the media chooses to give them air time whether they are advocating or "race hustling". And as far as Jackson telling the people in the inner cities to stay away from drugs, take care of family, and work harder.....aren't those things parents, community, churches, and the schools try to advocate as well. The difference between Jackson and Limbaugh..........Jackson is trying to encourage and Limbaugh just condemns. Speaking of hyprocrites isn't Limbaugh just a high-society prescription junkie anyway? Alot of hyprocrisy to go around.
Larry Gude
Strung Out
You look...
...at Jesse's story; the race to Chicago with MLK's 'blood on his hands' and getting rid of his best friend, a white guy, early on because it diluted his black message. He's been a hustler from day 1 in my book and more power to him. I just wish he'd preach how he built his world, hard work, to his flock.
I'm not gonna defend Limbaughs drug abuse.
thinkaboutit said:
...at Jesse's story; the race to Chicago with MLK's 'blood on his hands' and getting rid of his best friend, a white guy, early on because it diluted his black message. He's been a hustler from day 1 in my book and more power to him. I just wish he'd preach how he built his world, hard work, to his flock.
I'm not gonna defend Limbaughs drug abuse.
What does that have to do with this conversation?thinkaboutit said:
thinkaboutit
New Member
Hyprocrisy.
Lenny
Lovin' being Texican
thinkaboutit said:
But it looks like Associated Press and MSNBC are now taking the media to task for looking the other way.....
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18745632/
AP said:
JPC sr
James P. Cusick Sr.
Scofflaw and Personal Responsibility.
It is one big way of how the professionals in psychology determine mental illness by deducting if the person's reasoning is logical or sensible.
Like believing in demons, angles, God and the Devil, are logical and sensible while giving little or no hard proof.
Or believing that Elvis Presley is alive and hiding or that UFOs from other planets do regularly visit our earth, those are logical and sensible reasonings that any sane person could have.
It is only when the person makes statements or has beliefs and or actions that are not logical or reasonable that then mental illness is suspected and probably does exist.
Like if Dahlmer had thought the victims were really just cattle and beef steaks and did not know they were human then that is not logical or sensible.
Things like murder, homosexuality and canibalism for Dahlmer did not show him to have any mental illness at all, but that he was just a cold violent criminal.
Pushrod said:
It is one big way of how the professionals in psychology determine mental illness by deducting if the person's reasoning is logical or sensible.Like believing in demons, angles, God and the Devil, are logical and sensible while giving little or no hard proof.
Or believing that Elvis Presley is alive and hiding or that UFOs from other planets do regularly visit our earth, those are logical and sensible reasonings that any sane person could have.
It is only when the person makes statements or has beliefs and or actions that are not logical or reasonable that then mental illness is suspected and probably does exist.
Like if Dahlmer had thought the victims were really just cattle and beef steaks and did not know they were human then that is not logical or sensible.
Things like murder, homosexuality and canibalism for Dahlmer did not show him to have any mental illness at all, but that he was just a cold violent criminal.