While comrade GURPS goes on a bender
- Thread starter transporter
- Start date
This_person
Well-Known Member
Mr. Trump has ordered terrible violations of human rights at the border...
That's what passes to you as "rational"?
That's what passes to you as "rational"?
glhs837
Power with Control
Let everybody eat in peace. But that's not going to happen. They see the sort of cyclonic media effect when they do this crap, and they wont stop. Especially now that a sitting US Congresswoman has said not only that that's acceptable, but they should do it more and more often. Just watch, this tactic will escalate until someone gets hurt.
BOP
Well-Known Member
They're phucking with the segment of the population that owns the most guns. Has that thought not occurred to them?
BOP
Well-Known Member
Your definition of rational and people who actually know how to think for themselves definitions are two entirely different definitions.
Songfourone
New Member
Apparently not.
littlelady
God bless the USA
If you had any sense at all, you would be scared, or, at least, fearful of what is happening to the USA.
PsyOps
Pixelated
Well, that's a flip. I thought you people on the left held a huge fear of the bitter red neck, bible thumping, right wingers toting their guns. I mean, it is the reason you push for banning guns and gun control, right? We're too dangerous and it's scary knowing we have guns.
Hijinx
Well-Known Member
The Washington Post did not print that because they know it is wrong to harass people when they eat.
They printed it because they fear retribution from Conservatives and they don't want their reporters harassed when they eat.
Do not give the WAPO any credit for being nice, their reasoning is really quite visible.
Where does Steny eat anyway?
They printed it because they fear retribution from Conservatives and they don't want their reporters harassed when they eat.
Do not give the WAPO any credit for being nice, their reasoning is really quite visible.
Where does Steny eat anyway?
Songfourone
New Member
warneckutz
Well-Known Member
For you dems who embrace the lib lifestyle and love being known as weak, crybabies.
Freefaller
Active Member
Exactly which violations are those?
Since when is caging infants and disabled children seperate from their parents not a human rights violation? And threatening them if they talk to reporters they might never see their families again.
Pics, please?
Oh - I know. You're calling those areas with chained linked fence barriers "cages". Mainly that's because AP reporters called them that, and everyone else went with that.
They're walls - and they didn't spring up overnight. Some of the pics used for sensational effect were taken back as early as 2014.
When Obama was president.
See, I can't figure out if the left are opposing this on principle - volume - optics - humanitarian - scope - law --- because their much beloved ex-President did
the very same thing without a single minute of outrage. The ONLY difference being numbers, because Trump is expanding the law to include all illegal entry.
Was it a human rights violation - THEN? If it was, why did you support it?
Yes. Whole families were caged in jails. They were but they didn't seperate the families unless they believed the child was in danger until April of this year. Saying it happened under Obama is a lie. That law was not enforced. It was enforced only for the last two months.
Why is that so hard for you to understand? That is the point of all this discussion and outrage.
I don't believe people should be allowed to cross our borders illegally but if they do they should still be treated humanely and kept together when possible as the did for years before with no problem.
The way we treat people is what makes us or what once made us the greatest nation on earth.
Songfourone
New Member
Must remember that you get your news from Sarah Suckabee and Fox.
Then it makes sense.
Your hero Debbie Wasserman-Shulz just visited one of the children's facilities and was on record how impressed she was with how nice it was.
Oopsee...narrative go "boom".