While comrade GURPS goes on a bender

[SamSpade]

Yes. Whole families were caged in jails.

Wow. What a wonderful experience THAT must have been for children. In jail with everyone. So long as you're with parents, it doesn't matter if you're sleeping near a criminal.
At least in this country, we separate our own kids when their parents go to jail and put them in CPS.

So it's - ok for the Democrats to pass laws, so long as they're not enforced? That doesn't make any damned sense.
Probably a LITTLE more nonsensical than "I voted for it before I voted against it".

The current situation - with the resources we have - is to mostly - separate - keep them with families BUT incarcerated with them (against the law) or - let them go.
They are trying to keep them together now, but they don't have enough detention centers. They don't have enough personnel to speed up the process.
And through it all the Democrats want to stop any progress if they believe it will result in illegal aliens being turned back rather than
the atrocious catch and release policy that got us into this mess.

This CAN BE CORRECTED - but the only solution the Democrats want is - let them go.
And bitch about it.

 

[SamSpade]

Must remember that you get your news from Sarah Suckabee and Fox.

Then it makes sense.

??????
Actually I read most of that on the Atlantic, which is hardly a right-wing rag, but if this satisfies you, I'll let you stew in ignorance.
It helps you to think that the reason we disagree is, I'm getting only biased news - or I'm stupid.
Typical liberal boilerplate.

 

[SamSpade]

. They were but they didn't seperate the families unless they believed the child was in danger .

...and then they separated them. Difference being circumstances - but children still being taken from their parents.
Good, just so we're clear.

 

[This_person]

Exactly which violations are those?

I was quoting the initial post, questioning the "point" it made.

 

[Gilligan]

I'll let you stew in ignorance.

Stewing in ignorance is all that the Sappy crew ever does..

 

[This_person]

Since when is caging infants and disabled children seperate from their parents not a human rights violation?

When 17% of those kids were brought here illegally by those parents, and 83% of those kids were abandoned by their parents to be systematically raped and abused to anchor themselves in the United States to bring the parents in later.

 

[PsyOps]

Since when is caging infants and disabled children seperate from their parents not a human rights violation? And threatening them if they talk to reporters they might never see their families again.

The parents dragged those kids across some of the most dangerous terrain there is, risking their lives to get here against their will. Yet your outrage is that they are separated from their parents for a few days?

 

[PrchJrkr]

:crickets:

 

[Songfourone]

The parents dragged those kids across some of the most dangerous terrain there is, risking their lives to get here against their will. Yet your outrage is that they are separated from their parents for a few days?

How many children told you it was against their will?

Imagine how bad the situation WAS to make that as a choice.

Mind blown.

 

[This_person]

Imagine how bad the situation WAS to make that as a choice.

Mind blown.

83% of them came without their parents (at least). The parents were willing to let their kids be raped and abused as part of payment for harsh terrain travel here illegally in the hopes we would still act as the previous administration(s) did and the parents could easily hop a plane later and come here with their anchors providing the path. Those are the types of people, who willingly separated themselves from their children, that we are worried about getting back in control of their kids. Well, others are worried about, not me.

For those kind enough to come to our country illegally themselves and without giving their children up, that small percentage, they passed right by 9 consulates and an embassy in Mexico and maybe others in other countries, and did not choose to show up at a port of entry but tried to sneak in undetected. Any of those consulates, embassy, or ports of entry would have allowed them to legally seek asylum without fear of being separated from their children. They chose to go further, longer, and illegally. Now, if those situations were so bad, why would they not stop at any of those places? If the situations were so bad, why didn't they stay in Mexico, where certainly the conditions were much better than from where they came, and the culture is most likely much closer to theirs?

Mind blown.