Who are the real groomers?

StmarysCity79

Well-Known Member
Republicans are recently attacking libraries schools and drag shows at which they are accompined by their parents while also making it easier for children to work dangerous jobs in factories for low wages.

"Under the law, the Youth Hiring Act of 2023, children under 16 do not have to obtain permission from the Division of Labor to get a job. They will no longer need to get an employment certificate, which verified their age, described their work and work schedule, and included written consent from a parent or guardian. Sanders signed the bill into law on Tuesday.

Last month, the Labor Department announced it had found more than 3,800 children working at U.S. companies in violation of federal law. More than 100 children, some as young as 13, were working hazardous overnight jobs cleaning slaughterhouses for Packers Sanitation Services Inc., one of the country's largest food sanitation companies, the Labor Department said. Some of them used "caustic chemicals to clean razor-sharp saws," the department said. Ten of the violations occurred in Arkansas.

Since 2018, there has been a 69 percent increase in the number of children employed illegally by companies, the Labor Department said.
One bill advancing in the Iowa legislature would allow 14-year-olds to perform some work in freezers and meat coolers and would allow children under 16 to work up to six hours a day while school is in session. It would also exempt businesses from civil liability if a student in a work-based study program is sickened, injured or killed because of the company’s negligence. The Minnesota bill would let 16- and 17-year-olds work construction jobs."
 

StmarysCity79

Well-Known Member
In February 2023 the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) issued new findings on an ongoing investigation of Packers Sanitation Services, Inc. (PSSI) for illegally employing over 100 children between the ages of 13 and 17 in hazardous occupations at 13 meatpacking facilities owned by JBS, Cargill, Tyson, and others (DOL 2023). These children worked illegally on overnight shifts cleaning razor-sharp saws and other high-risk equipment on slaughterhouse kill floors. At least three of them suffered injuries, including burns from caustic cleaning chemicals. The Department of Homeland Security has announced a parallel investigation into whether these young workers, many of whom may be unaccompanied migrant children, were connected to illegal employment by traffickers who profited from their labor (Strickler and Ainsley 2023).

Multiple factories in Hyundai-Kia’s supply chain in Alabama are also under DOL investigation for employing children as young as 14 (DOL 2022a). Many of these children are from Guatemalan migrant families. Like meatpacking plants across the Midwest, “many of the Alabama [auto] plants relied on staffing firms to recruit low-wage assembly line workers” (Schneyer, Rosenberg, and Cooke 2023).
 

StmarysCity79

Well-Known Member
I know right! :lmao:

Because getting a job is the same as being manipulated into perverted sex with a tranny. :roflmao:

Why can';t you be honest or even express a rational thought in your reply? Are you really that dumb? Or do you think you are funny?

Show me where that is happening like i showed you where republicans are allowing children to work in dangerous conditions without their parents knowledge.
 

Monello

Smarter than the average bear
PREMO Member
In some cases, the children working and contributing to the household income is the difference between paying the rent or getting evicted and being out on the streets. In some families, that additional income makes a world of difference. May as well let them earn legally instead of put of legislative barriers and drive them to the underground economy.
 

Bird Dog

Bird Dog
PREMO Member
Why can';t you be honest or even express a rational thought in your reply? Are you really that dumb? Or do you think you are funny?

Show me where that is happening like i showed you where republicans are allowing children to work in dangerous conditions without their parents knowledge.
How do you expect the thousands of illegals to be able to eat and clothe themselves. Prostitution? They have to work...... They are working with their families...... Oh, I know you and your ilk will start hiring them as maids and landscapers for your McMansions. Hypocrite!
...and you are the ones letting them in
 

Kyle

Beloved Misanthrope
PREMO Member
Why can';t you be honest or even express a rational thought in your reply? Are you really that dumb? Or do you think you are funny?

Show me where that is happening like i showed you where republicans are allowing children to work in dangerous conditions without their parents knowledge.
YOU made the comparison in the title. :sshrug:

Did you already forget?
 

StmarysCity79

Well-Known Member
In some cases, the children working and contributing to the household income is the difference between paying the rent or getting evicted and being out on the streets. In some families, that additional income makes a world of difference. May as well let them earn legally instead of put of legislative barriers and drive them to the underground economy.

Because what this bill does is remove oversight and help take advantage of a vulnerable uneducated population. They will no longer have a parent or guardian looking out for them.

Isnt that the exact thing you are saying children should have in terms of school curriculum and library books? How can you hold so many diametrically opposing views?

"They will no longer need to get an employment certificate, which verified their age, described their work and work schedule, and included written consent from a parent or guardian."
 

AnthonyJames

R.I.P. My Brother Rick
Because what this bill does is remove oversight and help take advantage of a vulnerable uneducated population. They will no longer have a parent or guardian looking out for them.

Isnt that the exact thing you are saying children should have in terms of school curriculum and library books? How can you hold so many diametrically opposing views?

"They will no longer need to get an employment certificate, which verified their age, described their work and work schedule, and included written consent from a parent or guardian."
What if they were raised by coyotes?
1680544849892.png
 

DaSDGuy

Well-Known Member
Why can';t you be honest or even express a rational thought in your reply? Are you really that dumb? Or do you think you are funny?

Show me where that is happening like i showed you where republicans are allowing children to work in dangerous conditions without their parents knowledge.
Staying on topic with the OP, here is a fine example of the democratic party lifestyle - cross dresser lap dancing kids in school. Question answered. Groomer party identified.

1680545278960.jpeg
 

DaSDGuy

Well-Known Member
How do you know the age of anyone in the photo or where the event took place?
Easily locate articles show students as young as 14. Do your own homework. Now, deflect and elude the truth. Typical liberal when losing a discussion. Next will be insults.
 

Kyle

Beloved Misanthrope
PREMO Member
How do you know the age of anyone in the photo or where the event took place?








That enough for you Democrat Perv?
 

DaSDGuy

Well-Known Member
Prove it liar.

All you did was posted a screenshot with no context
And there is the insult. Lame, really lame. But entirely expected from a liberal.

FYSA - Kyle did the homework for your lazy ass. See post #14

R U gonna double down on your ignorance?
 

Monello

Smarter than the average bear
PREMO Member
Because what this bill does is remove oversight and help take advantage of a vulnerable uneducated population. They will no longer have a parent or guardian looking out for them.

Isnt that the exact thing you are saying children should have in terms of school curriculum and library books? How can you hold so many diametrically opposing views?

"They will no longer need to get an employment certificate, which verified their age, described their work and work schedule, and included written consent from a parent or guardian."
This is the story of most immigrants to the US. They come dirt poor. The entire household gets busy working. In a few years, through, hard work, they have bettered themselves financially.

The only difference today is that the immigrant may not have legal permission to reside inside the borders of America. This is a way to enable illegals to earn more money for their households.
 

Kyle

Beloved Misanthrope
PREMO Member
And there is the insult. Lame, really lame. But entirely expected from a liberal.

FYSA - Kyle did the homework for your lazy ass. See post #14

R U gonna double down on your ignorance?
She's got her hands over her eyes right now. :lmao:
 

StmarysCity79

Well-Known Member
This is the story of most immigrants to the US. They come dirt poor. The entire household gets busy working. In a few years, through, hard work, they have bettered themselves financially.

The only difference today is that the immigrant may not have legal permission to reside inside the borders of America. This is a way to enable illegals to earn more money for their households.


These are not all immigrants. These are american born minors.

If they were minors it would be even worse -Lets employ kids who dont speak english and cant advocate for themselves and make a law saying their aprents dont need to know or approve of the jobs we are giving them and what they entail.
 
Top