Who decides which co-ed is a slut and whish isn't?

Lurk

Lurk

Happy Creepy Ass Cracka
High school yearbook photos. Who can tell when the year book staff will say you're showing too much skin? Two girls with same outfit and same straight hair; one gets airbrushed, the other not.
 

Attachments

  • airbrush.jpg
    airbrush.jpg
    135.4 KB · Views: 1,355
S

sm8

Active Member
There is one picture that I can not get the link to work to that does not even look like the same kid: different hair, head tilt, eyes and smile.
 
glhs837

glhs837

Power with Control
I do want to note that this happened in Utah, and evidently there were signs posted that all picture were subject to editing. The issue appears to be that the school officials who did/approved the editing didnt edit equally. some girls pictures showing more skin that the edited ones were not touched.......
 
B

BernieP

Resident PIA
glhs837 said:
I do want to note that this happened in Utah, and evidently there were signs posted that all picture were subject to editing. The issue appears to be that the school officials who did/approved the editing didnt edit equally. some girls pictures showing more skin that the edited ones were not touched.......
Click to expand...
Mormon girls versus non-Mormons?

IDK - part of me says they do have the right to maintain a certain standard of attire, but looking at the before picture I can't say as I would think that would be offensive or considered lude.
Given this as an example of what they choose to edit, you have to question what the criteria was or was it purely arbitrary.

ummm - I may see a reason why, looks like they covered up her tatoo.
So it's not the low neck line, it could be that they didn't like the tatoo showing and that edit looks more "natural".

oy vey
 
Tito

Tito

Donkey Smell
Lurk said:
High school yearbook photos. Who can tell when the year book staff will say you're showing too much skin? Two girls with same outfit and same straight hair; one gets airbrushed, the other not.
Click to expand...

Huh? I think this story went over Ur head. The pic is of the same girl. Just showin how it was airbrushed
 
mamatutu

mamatutu

mama to two
Tito said:
Huh? I think this story went over Ur head. The pic is of the same girl. Just showin how it was airbrushed
Click to expand...

Apparently, you didn't click on 'year book staff' which was Lurk's link to the story. He is clever like that! It is the blue words in his post. Actually, it went over your head! :lol:
 
glhs837

glhs837

Power with Control
BernieP said:
Mormon girls versus non-Mormons?

IDK - part of me says they do have the right to maintain a certain standard of attire, but looking at the before picture I can't say as I would think that would be offensive or considered lude.
Given this as an example of what they choose to edit, you have to question what the criteria was or was it purely arbitrary.

ummm - I may see a reason why, looks like they covered up her tatoo.
So it's not the low neck line, it could be that they didn't like the tatoo showing and that edit looks more "natural".

oy vey
Click to expand...


No, the fake top doesn't go high enough to cover the tattoo, the tat was straight fleshtone photoshop.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top