WMD Found in Iraq

[Spoiled]

Saddam was a weapon, but that video is very misleading. Especially the title of it, many people will assume they literally found WMDs.

 

[BuddyLee]

Did saddam personaly kill the people?


No...


silly republicans trying to say he was the person that did the killing... that just like saying guns kill, they dont kill the people holding them cause them to kill... but that would be annother double republican standard i guess?

Whoa dude, you are way too liberal for me. If George Bush did the same thing I bet you would be the first to jump up and down.

 

[Spoiled]

Whoa dude, you are way too liberal for me. If George Bush did the same thing I bet you would be the first to jump up and down.

dammit, i was pointing out the irony of how pubs say guns dont kill people but saddam directly did

 

[FromTexas]

Did saddam personaly kill the people?


No...


silly republicans trying to say he was the person that did the killing... that just like saying guns kill, they dont kill the people holding them cause them to kill... but that would be annother double republican standard i guess?

What the f are you smoking? Lay off the crack you got for registering to be a democrat and think about what you are saying. Between the above post and your later post, you suggest the Republican logic that guns don't kill people, people do alleviates Saddam and Hitler from crime under Republican logic?!?! I swear you Dems get around a table and have a seance to Timothy Leary and take your ideology from his acid tripping ghost.

GUNS DON'T KILL PEOPLE, PEOPLE DO!

The soldiers, weapons, etc... used by Hitler and Saddam would be the gun in this instance! The person actively using the instrument would be Hitler or Saddam (and thus they would be the PEOPLE doing the killing). Saddam and Hitler can not be quantified as the the weapon in that respect. Albeit, the guys point is that in his actions he is greater than the WMD in his killing.

 

[FromTexas]

dammit, i was pointing out the irony of how pubs say guns dont kill people but saddam directly did

And your logic was as flawed as the thought of a diamond popping out of Barbara Streisand's ass, singing dixie, and converting her over to the conservative way of life.

 

[Spoiled]

What the f are you smoking? Lay off the crack you got for registering to be a democrat and think about what you are saying. Between the above post and your later post, you suggest the Republican logic that guns don't kill people, people do alleviates Saddam and Hitler from crime under Republican logic?!?! I swear you Dems get around a table and have a seance to Timothy Leary and take your ideology from his acid tripping ghost.

GUNS DON'T KILL PEOPLE, PEOPLE DO!

The soldiers, weapons, etc... used by Hitler and Saddam would be the gun in this instance! The person actively using the instrument would be Hitler or Saddam (and thus they would be the PEOPLE doing the killing). Saddam and Hitler can not be quantified as the the weapon in that respect. Albeit, the guys point is that in his actions he is greater than the WMD in his killing.

thanks for explaining my post directly above yours

 

[BuddyLee]

dammit, i was pointing out the irony of how pubs say guns dont kill people but saddam directly did

But he did.

 

[Spoiled]

But he did.

i said that i thought ;\

 

[FromTexas]

thanks for explaining my post directly above yours

There is no irony because your logic is flawed. As spelled out in my post if you bother to use half that brain cell you have left and make sense of it.

 

[2ndAmendment]

which is why everyone here hates me because im not ignorant, and they all love eachother and think they are strong...

You are in college? You are not ignorant? Your English is atrocious. You do not use proper capitalization, punctuation, spelling, or grammar. Your political arguments are just the party rhetoric; if the party line changes so does yours. Do yourself a favor; quit posting. You make yourself look more ignorant with every post.

I don't hate you either. I think your logic is totally flawed as is your politics. As I have told BuddyLee, you are young and idealistic. Someday, if you emotionally grow up, you may become more pragmatic and realize that idealism does not work in a world that is not ideal in any way.

 

[aocasio]

I find the argument made by some about not holding Saddam Hussein not personally responsible somewhat amusing. First and foremost, the Nuremberg Tribunal established that Hitler was guilty of the Holocaust and indicted him despite his death.

1.3 million dead and Saddam Hussein is not guilty?!?!?!!?