kom526
They call me ... Sarcasmo
How does the future look good? The US, by all rights, should have been down 3, maybe 4 goals long before 90 minutes was up. Belgium displayed a skill level, across the board, that the US is nowhere near matching, let alone surpassing. It is one thing to get through to the round of 16 and that's pretty heady stuff for where we are now but, it is a WHOLE other thing to be on the level of Belgium or Argentina or Germany or France or Brazil or even teams like Spain that got sent packing. At best, that late shot at, what, 88 minutes, goes in, we win one of those quintessential soccer games where one team dominates the entire game but, can't buy a goal and the clearly lesser team squeaks one in to win.
Don't get me wrong, it would have been great fun to have won and faced Argentina but, we are well out of our class when it comes to the truly elite teams. Do we have one player that would have started for Belgium?
In any event, it was fun while it lasted and now down to some SERIOUS world class soccer.
![]()
The future looks good because we have some young promising players in the pipe, (Yedlin, 20 & Green, 19) and the game is gaining popularity in the US. There are plenty of players on USMNT thatplay in the Premier League as well as other leagues in Europe. Do you think these guys do not benefit from that coaching? As far as tweaking our play style, we, as Americans, focus too much on individual play as opposed to a total TEAM approach. THAT is what makes us sort of an 'also-ran' when it come to world class soccer. Watch several European league games, then watch South American soccer and look for the differences. I think we may be caught in between both styles and are still trying to find our style.