mAlice
professional daydreamer
vraiblonde said:The baby won't necessarily be born with HIV, if the mother has proper treatment. But I agree with you that the hospital responsible for giving her mother the tainted blood should be held liable.
That said, I have no real problem with the Navy (read: us) paying for it. The father served, and I'm okay with picking up the cost of his daughter's HIV treatment.
The more I think about it, the less I think that even the civilian hospital should be liable. This was an unknown disease at the time. If a new plague popped up tomorrow, are we to hold someone responsible for that?
If the Navy drops her, she can still get medical assistance if she needs it.