PsyOps
Pixelated
First, again, I make a lot of editorial mistakes myself, so I am not a fanatic about it, but would you PLEASE learn how to punctuate properly? Commas, for example, do not normally have a space before them. Nor do periods. Your horrific use of the printed English language is exceptionally distracting.
Second, it would seem from the evidence that it was Mr. Martin who felt he had the right to make that determination and that Mr. Zimmerman protected himself from just such an act of aggression from Mr. Martin. While I would agree it would have been better if Mr. Zimmerman had simply allowed the suspicious character go unchecked after calling it in, it would have been even better than that if Mr. Martin had not engaged and subsequently attacked (physically) Mr. Zimmerman.
It would seem some think Mr. Martin had the right to stand his ground, but Mr. Zimmerman did not. I believe they both have the right to do so, and both would have been better off to not exercise that right. But, in the end, the evidence showed Mr. Martin to be the physical aggressor, and that is simply intolerable.
So, your belief of who felt they had that right that night seems to be factually inaccurate.
It seems Zimmerman's 'missteps' are confirmation for many that he must be guilty of murder. Court verdicts and the legal system playing out means nothing. It's like the Michael Brown incident... the facts proved that Brown never put his hands up, tried to take Wilson's gun, and charged Wilson. The shooting was found justified. But some folks aren't interested in these FACTS. They want to fabricate their own that supports a specific agenda; a FALSE narrative.
Last edited: