Midnightrider
Well-Known Member
Here you go, pal, straight from the New York Times, aka "The Leftist Bible":
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/19/us/politics/trump-russia-associates-investigation.html?_r=1
American law enforcement and intelligence agencies are examining intercepted communications and financial transactions as part of a broad investigation into possible links between Russian officials and associates of President-elect Donald J. Trump, including his former campaign chairman Paul Manafort, current and former senior American officials said.
There is no evidence, at this point, to say it wasn't or it was Obama and his admin submitted the FISA warrant. The article is talking about intel agencies examining intercepted communications and financial transactions of Trump. Two different things.
So, who requested the FISA warrant? We... don't... know... yet. If it was Obama, this very well could turn out to be another Watergate debacle. If not, and it was someone related to Obama, this could very well be another Watergate debacle. In any event, the wiretaps appear to have turned up nothing! NOTHING!
You liberals are now on the defensiveto justify this. Now go ahead and post your pointless smilies and names as your substantive retort.
why would anyone need to defend the wiretaps? They were authorized by the court and as I understand it there is a very high bar to meet in order to get approval. this wasn't G Gordon Liddy sneaking into trump tower to plant an illegal bug.
What was wrong or off topic about what I said?
That's a good question?