Radiant1
Soul Probe
However, making it a graduation requirement is ridiculous. That's political grandstanding.
Why? I mean, when you think about it, why is the PE/Health credit itself mandatory, and why doesn't anyway complain about that?
However, making it a graduation requirement is ridiculous. That's political grandstanding.
And do you all think the state is going teach this class free of charge, or are they going to require a fee for the class. This is nothing more then the government dictating something on the thought of "collective salvation".
If the student wants to learn CPR, fine, offer the class but to make it mandatory is like the state making eight hours of sleep mandatory because it will keep everyone healthy.
You live to complain, don't you. The current "save" rate for CPR in Saint Mary's County is 9%. In Seattle, WA it's about 60%. Having someone there who knows to do something is the critical difference.
CPR is not difficult. It isn't something that's hard to retain. It has been simplified to the point that just about anyone can retain the simple steps. At worst they'd be able to follow directions from 911.
There are a lot of "feel good" programs in the schools today, but this one is not one of the extra, worthless ones. This one will save lives, maybe even YOUR life.
I learned CPR as part of a high school PE class. There's no reason it could not be taught as part of that or a health class. This is a simple and effective way to give these kids a skill that they can use for the rest of their lives.
Learned CPR for Boy Scout 1st Aid merit badge 45 years ago in the days of the pre-cardial thump, and have had refresher training a time or two since due to job requirements. Have never had to use the knowledge, other 1st aid skills, too many times to count.
It's good to learn.
Every first aid course I ever took paid off when my then 2 YO son was choking and I did the Heimlich on him. If I hadn't had that training, I could have been like the other people in the room staring at him with a bewildered look.Learned CPR for Boy Scout 1st Aid merit badge 45 years ago in the days of the pre-cardial thump, and have had refresher training a time or two since due to job requirements. Have never had to use the knowledge, other 1st aid skills, too many times to count.
It's good to learn.
Every first aid course I ever took paid off when my then 2 YO son was choking and I did the Heimlich on him. If I hadn't had that training, I could have been like the other people in the room staring at him with a bewildered look.
And do you all think the state is going teach this class free of charge, or are they going to require a fee for the class. This is nothing more then the government dictating something on the thought of "collective salvation".
If the student wants to learn CPR, fine, offer the class but to make it mandatory is like the state making eight hours of sleep mandatory because it will keep everyone healthy.
Not sure we're you get your info from but you are misinformed. The CPR class is already being taught. At least it is in SMCPS. My 12th grader just passed his CPR Cert test three weeks ago. The CPR class was given as part of the already existing PE/Health class. There was no aditional fee for the CPR Cert.
Not sure we're you get your info from but you are misinformed. The CPR class is already being taught. At least it is in SMCPS. My 12th grader just passed his CPR Cert test three weeks ago. The CPR class was given as part of the already existing PE/Health class. There was no aditional fee for the CPR Cert.
Never said learning CPR was a bad thing, just don't think it should be mandatory and don't think that the majority of high schools students will retain the info 24 hours after they are taught it.
Completely disagree with you on that. Believe it or not, the majority of kids that age have a better chance of retaining that info than many adults.
Why? I mean, when you think about it, why is the PE/Health credit itself mandatory, and why doesn't anyway complain about that?
Maybe the only change is the 'mandatory' part.
He apparently has no contact with kids that age. Volunteering to work with high school kids sure opens your eyes to what kids really are like instead of the simplified stereotypes you get by sitting on your couch.
If you read the article, they're not going to be taught actual CPR so the title of the article/post are both misleading. All they will be teaching is the rhythm needed for chest compressions. What I'd be more concerned about, as a parent, is whether or not the 30 minutes of instruction provided would then allow the child to be covered by Maryland's Good Samaritan laws if they did attempt to save someone's life using what they had been taught. If not, all they are doing is setting the kids up to be sued if something goes wrong.
Nope:If you read the article, they're not going to be taught actual CPR so the title of the article/post are both misleading. All they will be teaching is the rhythm needed for chest compressions. What I'd be more concerned about, as a parent, is whether or not the 30 minutes of instruction provided would then allow the child to be covered by Maryland's Good Samaritan laws if they did attempt to save someone's life using what they had been taught. If not, all they are doing is setting the kids up to be sued if something goes wrong.
Maryland Law 5-309; Courts and Judicial Proceedings § 5-309
c. An individual who is not covered otherwise by this section is not civilly liable for any act or omission in providing assistance or medical aid to a victim at the scene of an emergency, if:
1. The assistance or aid is provided in a reasonably prudent manner;2. The assistance or aid is provided without fee or other compensation; and3. The individual relinquishes care of the victim when someone who is licensed or certified by this State to provide medical care or services becomes available to take responsibility.