So you really want to argue about what the meaning of "is" is? Because that's been done.
Its their thing.
So you really want to argue about what the meaning of "is" is? Because that's been done.
It's hard to fathom actually having a President that not only had a life before the White House but actually had a thriving business(es)..
It's hard to equate a Community Organizer and their lifestyle with somebody that actually made an economical difference to our country and employed thousands of his fellow American.
NOWHERE in the Constitution does it say a President has to give up the life he's accustomed to..
Let him keep running his businesses and he wouldn't have to do all this crap on the taxpayers dime.. but again.. How can they get their head around a successful business man actually being in office? You can't have it both ways.
What really blows my mind is all the outrage of him coming into the political arena filthy rich by the same people who aren't stopping to think about all of the career politicians who became filthy rich only AFTER becoming career politicians... let's stop and think about that a moment.
Now theres a law I can get behind... No Congressman or Senator can leave office with more net worth than the started with plus half their salary.What really blows my mind is all the outrage of him coming into the political arena filthy rich by the same people who aren't stopping to think about all of the career politicians who became filthy rich only AFTER becoming career politicians... let's stop and think about that a moment.
It's hard to fathom actually having a President that not only had a life before the White House but actually had a thriving business(es)..
Your law seems reasonable... yet this is what they came up with...Now theres a law I can get behind... No Congressman or Senator can leave office with more net worth than the started with plus half their salary.
Its amazing how many come in with nothing and leave Multimillionaires. And no one questions.
I wonder how they estimated that. I find it hard to believe that is that much when Obama's two-week vacation in Hawaii cost $4.8M (which didn't include AF1 costs, which is covered by the AF).Although the agencies which handle most of these expenses did not reply to the Post’s request for specific figures, the newspaper was able to estimate that the president’s three trips to Mar-a-Lago probably cost roughly $10 million,
" President Donald Trump may have been elected as the nominee of a party that prides itself on fiscal conservatism, ]
I wonder how they estimated that. I find it hard to believe that is that much when Obama's two-week vacation in Hawaii cost $4.8M (which didn't include AF1 costs, which is covered by the AF).
So you really want to argue about what the meaning of "is" is? Because that's been done.
Yeah, I'm having a hard time with that number, too. Additionally, President Trump owns Mar-A-Lago, so he's not paying for that, outside of making his mortgage payment, if he has one. I don't see this as any different than going to Camp David.
I wonder how they estimated that. I find it hard to believe that is that much when Obama's two-week vacation in Hawaii cost $4.8M (which didn't include AF1 costs, which is covered by the AF).
where do you think secret service and trumps entourage stay? you think he comps them?
He might give them a group discount.
I don't know what the story is, if it costs no more for him to stay at the White House or to go somewhere else - IF the bulk of the cost is the security detail that has to follow.
Unlike several previous Presidents, it's not as though he doesn't already own fancy digs all over the world. He doesn't NEED to rent out an entire hotel - if he already OWNS it.
Most of the time, I didn't mind Obama taking vacations so long as he didn't take a LOT more than your typical President, he didn't run up the bill needlessly and especially if he didn't decide his family needed to go on their own vacations at the same time at taxpayer's expense. Years ago, when I was in that cult, they would decide they needed to have their yearly leader's retreat. In Paris. In nice hotels. For a week. Or TWO. With their families. At the expense of struggling families contributing ten percent of their gross because they believe their faith requires them to. I got disgusted with the wastefulness - those guys had NO concept of frugality.
and a couple of 20% off coupons for a massage