Wait..this thread is about you posting the leak of Mueller questions by Donal Trump as a declaration of fact, which is obviously not. Did you get lost?....confused?..addled?..
"Trump leaks Mueller questions" to throw off investigation
- Thread starter Sapidus
- Start date
Wait..this thread is about you posting the leak of Mueller questions by Donal Trump as a declaration of fact, which is obviously not. Did you get lost?....confused?..addled?..
Actually, Hillary convinced me that she was a lying, scheming, ill-tempered old crook way back the 90s. Trump had nothing to do with that.
You could probably do with a reading comprehension brush up too.
I quoted someone who's opinion it was that the White House leaked the questions. I then showed how Trump has manipulated the media in the past which indicates that it is within the realm of possibility.
You came up with all the rest in your tiny tiny mind
duped how exactly
you are too ignorant to understands the breath of Hillary's Crimes, you should not be allowed to vote
what scary brown people you racist .... you mean MUSLIMS that want to kill and Murder Westerners
NOT According to the New York Times ...
only a fantasy in YOUR Tiny Mind .....
Why do you listen to the Communist News Network?
This_person
Well-Known Member
Fair enough , it is within the realm of possibility.
In the realm of LIKELY possibility, no.
The most likely possibility is that the NYT completely fabricated the questions out of whole cloth.
That Trump used the name John Barron which he admitted under oath.
You said it was one reporters opinion. I showed you where you were wrong
As a matter of fact no. The only way we could know for a fact would be if the WH made a statement saying so. Even then Trump would most likely deny it.
It seems more than likely based on the evidence however.
This_person
Well-Known Member
It seems far more likely that the NYT made up a bunch of questions for which they would like an answer; asking leading questions as if the stem of the question is factual.
If it had been the NYT:
Then why would they have not asked anything about collusion Sherlock? And why would one of the worlds leading newspapers make grammatical errors?
Why are you such a Trump apologist.?
Hasn't he given you enough reasons to mistrust him yet?
This_person
Well-Known Member
Journalists and reporters are so used to shorthand and common language mistakes that they make them all the time.
They didn’t ask about collusion because there’s not a molecule of evidence that there has been any, and there’s no crime involved if there were.
I am not a Trump apologist - it was only several days ago I suggested that him directing the DoJ to not enforce drug laws uniformly by state is grounds for impeachment.
Son, if you trust ANY politician - ones you like or dislike alike - you are a fool.
So you are suggesting the NYT, in making a list of questions is most likely to asked in the collusion investigation, wouldn’t ask a single question about collusion. ?
Shorthand is not the same as publishing grammatical errors.
Do you really believe your own crap? No wonder you lap up Trumps
Sound like you are apologizing for Trump leaking to the press to lessen the impact once Mueller presents the questions.
This_person
Well-Known Member
So, you're suggesting the special prosecutor for an investigation on collusion would provide a list of questions that does not include anything about collusion?
Nor is it the only thing I said. I also said that thing about language, and that thing about common language mistakes. I also said the stuff about it being common that news reports include grammatical errors all the time. You should read the whole of my posts, they include more than the stuff you're ready to refute.
Sounds like you think it is factual that Trump leaked to the press, and you didn't read that part where I said I believe Trump has performed an action that I believe is grounds for impeachment.
We don't know Trump leaked. We don't know he didn't. We don't know who, if anyone, leaked anything.
Are you comfortable with the idea that maybe someone on the SP's team (or, potentially, the SC himself) is potentially leaking to the press?
Of course not. The White House didn’t include those questions in their leak. Thus adding to the theory that the White Josie is trying to minimize the importance of the questions and the collusion portion.
Who has a reason to leak? That’s pretty much all you need to ask.
The SC has no reason and would most likely not have made grammatical errors in their version of the questions.
Someone transcribing or interpreting from a phone call or conversation or from supposition is more likely to make those type of errors.
Of course news report have errors in them sometimes. However if the NYT was making up this story out of no where they would be extra careful not to make any mistakes.
Based on Trump history of lies I would say it makes much more sense he is lying then the NYT which most sane people consider one of the most reputable papers in the world.