No, you say it like so, "Good For You".
No, you say it like so, "Good For You".
I think that Trump has a good reason for making that statement the way he did. I am not willing to throw the baby out with the bathwater, just yet. I think Trump's record of being a shrewd businessman (The Art of the Deal - i.e., makin' deals) far exceeds any politician's opinion of what you can and cannot say in pursuit of international diplomacy. I don't think he's done, yet. This is his style - it always has been. And it's been working - so why expect anything different?
Look at all the rats' statements coming out - they're crawling all over each other to be the first to flog him, and they're revealing information while they're doing it. Sure, he's got some Republicans steamed, too, but I think that Trump is okay with taking that heat in order to get a little further in his quest to make progress in US/Russia diplomacy.
**I'm not going to argue for the sake of argument with the fools on this forum, nor do I have time to spend all day nit picking the nuances in/of Trump's words.
Chris Wallace had an interview with him. I thought it was pretty damned good. He didn't pull punches, but didn't go full brimstone on Putin's butt.
Still, the remark about Putin's enemies ending up dead is probably not going to win him a follow up.
I just think it was ill-advised for Trump to give the appearance of believing Putin's denial.
We will never get an admission from Putin that Russia hacked our election.
Two things come to mind --I think that Trump has a good reason for making that statement the way he did.
So here's a thought...try searching for the transcript? Did that ever cross your mind?
BTW...if you haven't seen "anything terrible" in Trump's comments...you should really do 1 of 3 things:
Every post you make is against anyone or any group that doesn't conform to your propagandist viewpoints.
Two things come to mind --
One, the left and the press are always all over Trump's tactless, less than diplomatic approach to things.
For good reason - when he IS diplomatic - like cancelling a yearly exercise for the North Korean meeting - the left
and the press went and STILL have gone nuts suggesting he's gutted our defense there.
And two - historically, the left has ZERO faith in our intelligence agencies, most notably during the Iraq War, but
prior to that. Always. They only have greatly magnified it in the wake of the Trump investigation regarding Russia -
even though it apparently sat on its hands when all this "collusion" was going on.
even though it apparently sat on its hands when all this "collusion" was going on.
Former President Barack Obama’s cybersecurity czar confirmed Wednesday that former national security adviser Susan Rice told him to “stand down” in response to Russian cyber attacks during the 2016 presidential campaign.
Michael Daniel, whose official title was “cybersecurity coordinator,” confirmed the stand-down order during a Senate Select Committee on Intelligence hearing held to review the Obama and President Donald Trump’s administrations’ policy response to Russian election interference.
Rice’s order to Daniel was first reported in “Russian Roulette,” a book published in March that details Russia’s meddling in the election.
Which is why I'm puzzled by the asking.
And it's "Interfered" not "hacked!"
Yeah, yeah! Tomaato, tomahto.
I have very little reason to doubt the intel.
A little more than that... If you keep letting the Dems say it was "Hacked" it supports the idea that Hillary was cheated out of the election.
A lie I'm not inclined to allow them to push.
Chris Wallace had an interview with him. I thought it was pretty damned good. He didn't pull punches, but didn't go full brimstone on Putin's butt.
Still, the remark about Putin's enemies ending up dead is probably not going to win him a follow up.
WTF is going on in this country??? Why have we allowed this??
Really? Because after the last year or so, I automatically presume those ####bags are lying and they have to prove to me that they're not.
And let's not pretend it's just them. We do it too; and not just with Russia.
We will never get an admission from Putin that Russia hacked our election.
Because somewhere in the process, generation after generation, slowly submitted to the idea that we elect "Leaders" rather than "Representatives!"
Citizens became comfortable with being Subjects.
Exactly, so what's the point of needling him about it?
This is the problem with the masses: they have no follow up. They have reactionary here and now. Hooray, you press Putin and he admits that his government "meddled in our election". Now what? Nuke his country? Punch him in the nose? Tell him to "knock it off"? Impose sanctions and starve his citizens out?
Trump thinks about the "then what?" and proceeds with a goal in mind. If the goal is having a solid working relationship with Russia, picking a fight over something so dumb isn't the path to success.
All this "Putin won the summit" is just more ignorance. Yeah, lucky winner Putin - man, people all over the world are just flocking to go live in his country, it's so awesome.