6 year olds carrying anti-abortion signs

[mAlice]

I'm not one for protests, but I think I'd like standing across the street from them holding signs to educate their children.

 

[Makavide]

I can think of several choice words I'd like to introduce their children to next time they form a daisy chain.

There were a few people who decided to "introduce choice" words while driving by. And I explained to my kids again,as I have in the past, that people us those words out of ignorance. They have a limited vocabulary due to lack of education and or social graces.

 

[mAlice]

There were a few people who decided to "introduce choice" words while driving by. And I explained to my kids again,as I have in the past, that people us those words out of ignorance. They have a limited vocabulary due to lack of education and or social graces.

Oh, you misunderstand me completely. I wouldn't swear at all.

 

[MMDad]

You are trying to inflict your morals on us. The innocent, unborn child does not get a choice! He/she is not asked if they want to live or be chopped up and thrown out.
And the Gospel says that when one is going astray, the rest of us must fratererly correct them, first privately, them with a small group, and then to the entire community.

Arrogant again. You are pushing your gospel onto people who don't want you to. Fortunately, the constitution protects my right to believe as I want. You are no different than the crusaders, or the Islamic extremists who believe it's my way or the highway.

 

[Pete]

Woo-hoo! I got anonymous red! I must be doing something right if they don't have the courage to sign it!

Dude, you really need to get over the red unsigned karma thing.

 

[tomchamp]

Arrogant again. You are pushing your gospel onto people who don't want you to. Fortunately, the constitution protects my right to believe as I want. You are no different than the crusaders, or the Islamic extremists who believe it's my way or the highway.

Did the crusaders have highways?

 

[crabcake]

You are trying to inflict your morals on us. The innocent, unborn child does not get a choice! He/she is not asked if they want to live or be chopped up and thrown out.
And the Gospel says that when one is going astray, the rest of us must fratererly correct them, first privately, them with a small group, and then to the entire community.

You're assuming everyone shares your beliefs, and in doing so, you are sorely mistaken. Just because you hold in your hand a book that you believe in that tells you to do something doesn't make you a police officer; I didn't elect you to represent me; and I didn't choose you to have a child with. :shrug:

 

[mAlice]

You are trying to inflict your morals on us.

Well. If that isn't the pot calling the kettle black!

 

[meme]

Okay I'm lost. Is this a post about "is it right for a 6 year old to carry anti-abortion signs or is this about prochoice/proabortion?"

 

[MMDad]

Did the crusaders have highways?

Yes. The Romans built them, so they were there.

 

[mAlice]

Okay I'm lost. Is this a post about "is it right for a 6 year old to carry anti-abortion signs or is this about prochoice/proabortion?"

It's about "is it right for a 6 year old to carry anti-abortion sign and should my child have to see that as we drive down the road, but some people can't make the distiction between the two.

 

[meme]

It's about "is it right for a 6 year old to carry anti-abortion sign and should my child have to see that as we drive down the road, but some people can't make the distiction between the two.

That's what I thought. Thanks for the clarification.

 

[getthefacts]

I don't believe I have the right to judge someone else for what they feel is right for them

So if I "feel" something is right and/or moral to do then it is o.k. for me to do it?

Adolf Hitler would be the first one to tell you that he "felt" it was right to kill several million jews.

 

[BuddyLee]

if the truth is offensive it is not turth that must change.
america will reject abortion when america sees abortion.... you want to hide information so people are not " polarized " by the facts.
if the truth is offensive it is not turth that must change.
If you want it to be legal to kill innocent people then just say so directly

What an idiot! You're saying that everyone should know everything possible. Some people should know squat to protect the interests of others. Children shouldn't know certain things, they're children. I don't know what's worse, abortion or the killing of a childs innocence at a young age.

 

[tomchamp]

What an idiot! You're saying that everyone should know everything possible. Some people should know squat to protect the interests of others. Children shouldn't know certain things, they're children. I don't know what's worse, abortion or the killing of a childs innocence at a young age.

Abortion is way worse!

 

[crabcake]

I'm curious ... would it be morally okay for me to stand on a street and hold up Pro-Pornography signs in an effort to increase awareness to the various ways in which a couple could experience "lovely relations"?

 

[crabcake]

So if I "feel" something is right and/or moral to do then it is o.k. for me to do it?

Adolf Hitler would be the first one to tell you that he "felt" it was right to kill several million jews.

I didn't say that. I said I do not possess the right to tell someone else what they should/shouldn't do with their bodies; and neither do you.

And you SURELY lack the right to determine when it's appropriate to educate my child to such matters. Now, if you wanna start coughing up some bucks for child support, that's a different matter.

 

[MMDad]

I'm curious ... would it be morally okay for me to stand on a street and hold up Pro-Pornography signs in an effort to increase awareness to the various ways in which a couple could experience "lovely relations"?

Following the zealot logic, only if you have your six year old holding the sign.

 

[BuddyLee]

Even if you omit the reference to the creator the statements stand on their own due to natural law.

Natural law comes down to self interest. If you cannot defend yourself then you're screwed. You automatically sign a 'social contract' to have protection from the state, you are supposedly 'safe' now. If you're using 'natural law' then let it be natural law, it is then the people's own self interest and not yours imposing upon theirs.

 

[tomchamp]

I'm curious ... would it be morally okay for me to stand on a street and hold up Pro-Pornography signs in an effort to increase awareness to the various ways in which a couple could experience "lovely relations"?

You do have the right to do just that, but answer your own question? What it be morally ok?