Ah Yes ... Acceptance of Gays - Next Pedo's or Incest
- Thread starter GURPS
- Start date
Clem72
Well-Known Member
Russia has been sending men to the Olympics dressed as women for as long as I can remember. Now if they get caught they can just provide bogus documentation that they transitioned before 12.
Speaking of Biden overreach, in a terrific story mysteriously AWOL from corporate media, the Dallas Express ran an article Friday headlined, “Federal judge states Biden administration's unilateral Title IX changes are a ‘threat to democracy’.”
Last month, the Biden Administration extended Title IX protections — originally meant to protect women’s sports and ensure equal access to education — to trans people, pre-empting protective state laws and allowing punishment of any colleges and schools that ban biological men from playing in women’s sports or accessing their private areas.
In other words, Biden’s new rule re-defines ‘womanhood’ to include penis carriers. So much for the feminists’ concept of toxic masculinity; farewell, we barely knew thee.
Biden’s new 423-page rules also require schools to let men use womens’ bathrooms and changing rooms, and requires teachers to use ungrammatical pronouns whenever students feel the urge to experiment, as many times as they want to swap genders, without limitation.
Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana and Idaho filed suit, and late last week, federal district judge Terry Dougherty approved the four states’ emergency request for an injunction to halt the new Biden policy. By the way, Judge Dougherty is the same terrific Trump appointee who issued the great decision in Murthy v. Missouri, the social media censorship case now at the Supreme Court.
The plaintiff states correctly argued that Biden’s monstrous new rules turn Title IX on its head, undermining and eviscerating the law’s original objective. Encouragingly, the Court rejected the Biden Administration’s stupidly Orwellian effort to re-define “sex:”
But the Court really hit its stride considering whether Biden had authority to make sweeping social changes like this without Congress weighing in. Judge Dougherty relied on the court-developed major questions doctrine, which became invaluable during the pandemic. Major questions require an act of Congress and can’t be slipped in through agency rulemaking:
Maybe best of all, the Court found the new rules were irrational. In the law’s lingo, they are “arbitrary and capricious:”
Judge Dougherty was ungentle in his conclusion, explicitly calling Biden’s new Title IX rules “an abuse of power,” and quoting ancient wisdom about tyranny. His simple, straightforward conclusion needed no editing:
But the order’s final sentence was perhaps the best of all. Judge Dougherty — co-opting the left’s ceaseless refrain but using it properly — put the capstone on his order by correctly labeling executive overreach as a “threat to democracy:”
An appeal to the reliable Fifth Circuit will no doubt be forthcoming. From there, it will leap to the Supreme Court, which has, since 2020, been in the regular habit of striking revolutionary agency rulemaking like this 453-page monster.
Progress.
☕️ MEANDERING ☙ Monday, June 17, 2024 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠
Gaffe-prone Resident fills b-roll of weekend senior moment clips; critical Ohio bodily autonomy bill; dems jet-fuel the draft; terrific La. court decision drops important truth bombs; and more.
www.coffeeandcovid.com
Federal Title IX Transgender Rule Blocked in 6 More States
“There are two sexes: male and female,” begins the memorandum and opinion written by U.S. District Judge Danny C. Reeves, filed on June 17 at the U.S. District Court of the Eastern District of Kentucky, Covington Division.
The judge’s order grants a preliminary injunction blocking enforcement of the new rule in six states: Kentucky, Indiana, Ohio, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia. The rule has also been blocked in at least five other states.
Judge Reeves found that the Department of Education (DOE) exceeded its statutory authority in setting the new rules and acted in a way that was “arbitrary and capricious.”
In a move that sparked controversy and a flurry of lawsuits, the DOE on April 19 announced a final rule expanding the decades-old Title IX law that prohibits sex discrimination in schools to now include “sexual orientation” and “gender identity.”