Nothing around here really impresses me much past "Yea it was Ok".
I'm way more generous in my assessments, and not terribly demanding. We eat out frequently and typically enjoy the places we end up at - we don't get too many disappointments. One thing I rarely do is compare this restaurant's whatever to what I've eaten elsewhere. As in, this steakhouse's ribeye stands on its own merit, not compared to the best steak I've ever had in my whole entire life (which I don't even know where that was).
Austinites like to argue about food, BBQ and breakfast tacos in particular. This place has the best; no, THIS place does; meh, you people don't know what you're talking about, THIS place is the best. Like that. IMO, good BBQ is all good, and breakfast tacos....good grief, get a life. What a dumb thing to get snobbish about. This place having good brisket doesn't prevent this other place from having good brisket as well, but you cannot convince Austin pseudosnobs of that. AND they will ridicule you if you say you thought the BBQ at X was pretty good, and it's not on their "approved list".
(They're also a bunch of hippie liberals here, which explains their intolerance and conviction that they're right and everyone else is wrong.)
Anyway, I'm off on a tangent. My point (I think) is that I consistently have good restaurant experiences, so I'm curious when someone has such consistently bad or meh experiences. Maybe I just have low standards.