kwillia
n/a
$1000 through the church? Really? He told me there was no fee.
You are the first I've heard heard of getting one for free.
$1000 through the church? Really? He told me there was no fee.
You should probably contact a priest if it's that important to you. I was married in the Catholic church, wife is married to someone else now and I never heard anything about an annulment so I don't know what she did for round II :shrug:In order to marry again, has anyone had a past marriage annulled in the Catholic church? How difficult was the process?
the whole thing is a bunch of crap.
You can't get it annuled, because as far as the Catholic Church is concerned it wasn't a sacrement, so didn't really count in the first place.
You can't get it annuled, because as far as the Catholic Church is concerned it wasn't a sacrement, so didn't really count in the first place.
Maybe because it was a civil ceremony?You are the first I've heard heard of getting one for free.
You should probably contact a priest if it's that important to you. I was married in the Catholic church, wife is married to someone else now and I never heard anything about an annulment so I don't know what she did for round II :shrug:
$1000 through the church? Really? He told me there was no fee.
You are the first I've heard heard of getting one for free.
From a religous aspect he was never truly married in the first place.Is that a good thing? Does that mean he can "in the eyes of the Catholic religion" re-marry?
I didn't get it...didn't need it. The ex did and since they were members of the church, they didn't have to pay.
You realize that what I'm talking about is not a legal process, right?
I bet if you cared to check the records, there probably wasn't a true "annulment" in the first place. I don't know how long ago this was, but I'm under the impression it was a while back. It was probably just documentation that there wasn't a "true" marriage in the first place, in that it was never blessed by the Catholic Church. It is possible to not have a Catholic wedding but to later get it "blessed" and thus acknowledged by the Church. They were probably just seeking verification that that had never happened.Not true. My marriage was not considered a "Catholic wedding" but he needed to obtain the ecclesiastical annulment in order for him to be married in a Catholic ceremony in the church.
I bet if you cared to check the records, there probably wasn't a true "annulment" in the first place. I don't know how long ago this was, but I'm under the impression it was a while back. It was probably just documentation that there wasn't a "true" marriage in the first place, in that it was never blessed by the Catholic Church. It is possible to not have a Catholic wedding but to later get it "blessed" and thus acknowledged by the Church. They were probably just seeking verification that that had never happened.
From a theological standpoint...the Catholic Church considers marriage a sacrement. The same is true of Baptism, and receiving Holy Euchurist. A Church annulment is basically saying, "we take it back, it wasn't such a blessed event afterall." That doesn't mean they proclaim any children of the marriage to be bastards...(at least not since about 1965 or so).
It was in 1979..and, yes, there was an annulment which I never quite understood because according to the The Sacred Canons of the Catholic Church we never were really married.
I'm giving MY experience.
The ex didn't pay? I know someone that was charged $1000 and that was 12 years ago. There is no set fee just whatever they see is in your check book.
:don'taskdon'ttell:
i'm not all that treligious, but i am pretty sure god would still know