Floyd2004
-Void-
Dr. House doesnt seem to have any issues with itWould you fire someone who uses vicodin for chronic pain?

Dr. House doesnt seem to have any issues with itWould you fire someone who uses vicodin for chronic pain?
Yep, and im pretty damn good at fixing airplanes too.
Would you fire someone who uses vicodin for chronic pain?
I'm curious about this. Can you provide a link to reference both the other position and rehab?
Reasonable accommodation efforts, such as allowing time off for medical care, self-help programs, etc., must be extended to rehabilitated drug addicts or individuals undergoing rehabilitation.
Thanks. That's only for individuals with disabilities, not someone who tested positive on a piss test. I don't think it applies in OPs case.
^--second line of the first paragraphThe term "disability" means an individual has a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more of his/her major life activities or there is a record of such an impairment or an individual is regarded as having such an impairment.
With my condition I dont need to be working on planes anyhow. Im sorry if I offended anyone by ##### bout being out for only two weeks. Weve been wanting to get out of here anyhow, so i think this that opprtunity. Like I said I just figured Id share the story with everyone so someone might bennifit from it somehow...
If I'm not mistaken, I believe that drug and alcohol use are considered an addition, therefore they are considered a disability....Just as IBS or obesity are considered disabilities now
The ADA does not protect casual drug users; but individuals with a record of addiction, or who are erroneously perceived as being addicts, would be covered by the guidelines.
Yup, mistaken. It only protects former 'clean' addicts who have gone to rehab, or an employee that is going to rehab. It does not cover casual use.
Now put down the doobie and read the link you posted.![]()
Dude you smoke weed and work on multimillion dollar aircraft in hazardous enviroment at that, come on, zero tolerance to drugs. Your not an 18 year old who doesn not know better. I would let you go also, we dig our own graves.
Awwww.....Somebody got their wittle, stwoned feewings hurt. You forgot the...I dont smoke at work, I have no desire to. It would suck. Its funny when you think about it, how many come to work hungover from pounding a few too many the night before and thats perfectly legal and ok. I know from personal experience when I was a supervisor in the Navy the impairment that comes from that. There is no level of impairment after at least 6 hours. Smoke one at night, and your fine the next day. Anyhow, as I said before, I wasnt trying to start another weed thread.
Anywho, Im done with this one.
That is all... goodbye SOMD.com
No. He failed the test and broke company policy (and the law). He can be fired on the spot. He's not entitled to rehab (from his employer) at all.If the OP was popped on a piss test, he is preceived as an addict by his employer because he failed the test, right?
ADA does not have a provision for substance abuse. And for someone to claim ADA their disability cannot change what their job descriptions require. If someone is required to perform at heights aperson cannot request accomadation throught the ADA. That and no employer is required to help an employee if their drug use is found through a random drug test.If I'm not mistaken, I believe that drug and alcohol use are considered an addition, therefore they are considered a disability....Just as IBS or obesity are considered disabilities now
^--second line of the first paragraph
I believe that it if the person has been employed past the probationary period....the employer has to suspect drug use and/or give a random test....if the employee comes up positive, they have the option of taking the test again within a certian time frame(I think it's within 72 hours), just to be sure that it's not a false positive
After the employee fails the test, the employer has to offer time off for the employee to get treatment....if the employee refuses treatment and/or the second test, the employer can terminate
I dont smoke at work, I have no desire to. It would suck. Its funny when you think about it, how many come to work hungover from pounding a few too many the night before and thats perfectly legal and ok. I know from personal experience when I was a supervisor in the Navy the impairment that comes from that. There is no level of impairment after at least 6 hours. Smoke one at night, and your fine the next day. Anyhow, as I said before, I wasnt trying to start another weed thread.
Anywho, Im done with this one.
That is all...
goodbye SOMD.com
I guess I misunderstood the guidelines....what does "who are erroneously perceived as being addicts" mean?
If you have been to rehab, and are clean, but say, have track marks... they may think you are an addict when you no longer are.
If the OP was popped on a piss test, he is preceived as an addict by his employer because he failed the test, right?
No. You are only an addict if diagnosed as an addict, or admit to being an addict prior to the pop. Addiction comes with certain signs. Being a casual user is not one of them. Besides, every reeferhead I know says it isn't addictive
and yes, there is a reason that I am trying to get all of this straight....Bachelors in Business Administration with HR management(Masters in HR management)
Right on.
Oh....I don't smoke that crap....I use to and all it did was make me really tired
. Anyhow Im starting packing up today, so we can go stay with family in Richmond. Think Im gonna use my GI Bill and go back to school so I can try to get a job that dosent require me to be a mechanic anymore.
BRILLIANT!!
Why did you wait this long?
I'm sure the union will step up and cover your salary while you're medically disqualified
Because the American's with Disabilities Act is so confusing(to me) concerning his failed piss test and he wanted to make sure he was fired before he actually left![]()