cattitude said:
beachcat said:
belvak said:How sad. Very gripping photos. My thoughts go out to the families. Has the bridge been re-opened?
SoMDGirl42 said:I'm surprised they would post those photos knowing it was a fatal accident. I doubt the body had even been removed from the burning car (if in fact it was still in the car at all and not ejected) and no mention of the fatality in the write up.
Very sad.for the families
:shrug:mizteresa1965 said:Looking at the pictures though...........how would you begin to tell what type of vehicle it was?
It is very sad.
SoMDGirl42 said:I'm surprised they would post those photos knowing it was a fatal accident. I doubt the body had even been removed from the burning car (if in fact it was still in the car at all and not ejected) and no mention of the fatality in the write up.
Very sad.for the families
Huh? I don't understand what you mean.beachcat said:Yeah, I was VERY surprised they were posted. I'm sure they will probably remove them. Very graphic. Normally out of respect for families some fire depts don't post pics when there are fatalities
The accident was a fatal accident. Out of respect for the family of the deceased, the FD does not post pictures of the accident. Especially when the car is still on fire and the deceased may (or may not) still be in the vehicle. I think it could be very desturbing to some family members to see pictures of the vehicle their loved one was driving, on fire with them still in it.K_Jo said:Huh? I don't understand what you mean.![]()
MMDad said:http://www.pfvfd.org/photostory%2007/083007.htm
There's a pretty bad pic on the PF site. I'm surprised they put it up.
Jeff said:I don't see the Passenger vehicle(s) in these pics. That would be the ones they likely used discretion on.
penguin6 said:
MMDad said:Left hand side, second pic down. That's the car under the truck.