AK-74me
"Typical White Person"
...swirl to me.
Our little boy is a 1/4 Asian and has great skin, much better than mine and can tan so well. I am so jealous. Me I am either pure white or red.
...swirl to me.
This thread wasn't prompted because of that. But a friend of mine sent me this link. I just wonder if we have progressed as a nation or if we are still the same. This is ignorance.
:shrug:We're sorry, this video is no longer available
Our little boy is a 1/4 Asian and has great skin, much better than mine and can tan so well. I am so jealous. Me I am either pure white or red.
I wouldn't want my daughter to marry a man with too much family/history in the Middle East, there are just too many cases of the guys grabbing the kids and running off back to Pakistan or the like if the marriage doesn’t last. You'll never get your kids back and they will never be allowed to leave the country again. The culture there is just too hostile to females, how many men raised in that environment really respect women?
She #4 on menuI am white in a relationship with a half asian/half white. Is that interracial? If so I guess I am for it!
He #5 on menuOur little boy is a 1/4 Asian and has great skin, much better than mine and can tan so well. I am so jealous. Me I am either pure white or red.
I would also like the 14 people that voted "No" in this pole have a say. Why did they vote they way they did.......? I promise we won't throw sticks and stones.
I would also like the 14 people that voted "No" in this pole have a say. Why did they vote they way they did.......? I promise we won't throw sticks and stones.
Of course Israel counts. BTW, Pakistan is NOT the Middle East.
Being a "half-breed" myself, I find this thread rather entertaining. It never ceases to amaze me how many people need to have their head surgically extracted from their rectal cavity.
I would also like the 14 people that voted "No" in this pole have a say. Why did they vote they way they did.......? I promise we won't throw sticks and stones.
...but I'll give this a go;
It asks "Do you agree with..."
I don't agree with it on this basis; It is a complication. There are some cultural differences. All things being equal, which they are not, it is not ideal from a compatibility standpoint. But, that also includes religion, and all other races as well, be it the various European backgrounds, the various South American backgrounds and so on and so forth and then add in views on money, sex, politics and so on and so forth.
So, I don't 'agree' with a German marrying a Puerto Rican. I don't 'agree' with Catholics marrying Jews.
I also don't 'dis-agree' with any combination of two human beings. Differences are differences and as long as both parties are sincere, no problem. I think some people marry to spite differences and that's just stupid.
As if you would be able to get the time of day from someone like her.
You are not even on her radar. Limpduckdickloser
Plastic is the only way you fly.
racistinsomd said:I think and I am ashamed to admit it I would have a problem with anyone from the Middle East.
atlest when i post some racist remark its only for affect, not a true relfection of my hate for the people from an enitre geographical region....
Depends on your definition of ideal. If you think you'll find someone compatable with all of your views, you're in a dream world. Instead of trying to find someone with the same views, you're better off finding someone that you can work with and sort things out. Too many people get caught up trying to find perfection in an imperfect world.
The bold part makes me Catholics and Jewish people get along rather well.
...I agree with that your saying. 'Ideal' is totally subjective but, as a starting point, with no other information at all, one could say their 'ideal' mate is likely to have a fair amount in common with you among those thing may, not must, but may be race, religion, background, any number of views on right and wrong and up and down and left and right and so on and so forth.
If Rush Limbaugh and Barbara Streisand find, as you suggest, that they can 'sort things out' and live happily ever after then they'd meet your criteria of 'ideal'. I'm simply suggesting that that is not likely due to a great many other considerations.
As long as he's an upstanding citizen, gainfully employed, not a mooch, and treats her with respect and appreciation, I don't care if he's purple.
As long as he's an upstanding citizen, gainfully employed, not a mooch, and treats her with respect and appreciation, I don't care if he's purple.
Yes, they are part of who the person is but to automatically dismiss somebody because of one of these traits to me is inconceivable. I've had this discussion very recently in fact. Age, height, and the rest is pretty irrelevant to me - it's who the person is and what they are inside that matters.
And the poorer they are for eliminating a person who may be the perfect person for them based solely on some personal bias. And these are all learned behaviors, because we are not born with them.
And I totally disagree. I think people are so set in their ways and have been so brainwashed into thinking only a person fitting into categories X, Y, and Z are the only ones they would consider being with is unfortunate, because they're missing out on a lot of good relationships.
I would also like the 14 people that voted "No" in this pole have a say. Why did they vote they way they did.......? I promise we won't throw sticks and stones.