Boy Scouts and Gay Rights Again.........

bcp

In My Opinion
you do realize that gay men aren't really intrested in straight men .... I mean, would you hit on a lesbian and expect to get anywhere?

fool.

edit: and you still didn't answer how anyone being gay has any bearing on anyone.

no, I called you a fool for thinking that only gay people gave STDs.

your post said nothing about STDs

however, without the gays, what do you think the AIDs numbers would be looking like right now?
 

Xaquin44

New Member
your post said nothing about STDs

however, without the gays, what do you think the AIDs numbers would be looking like right now?

ooohhhhh I was thinking of the other time I called you a fool lol

my bad.

and I meant (when I said "gay men aren't really intrested in straight men") that they wouldn't activly persue a straight man .... I mean if a gay guy came up to you and said 'hey baby' (or whatever things gay guys say to men), and you said 'I'm straight' then presumably he would then leave you alone.

which is why I also said (in the same post) "I mean, would you hit on a lesbian and expect to get anywhere?"

you may hit on one not knowing, but upon finding out, would you still keep at it?

I would hope not.

edit: and as for aids .... possibly they may be down .... but that wouldn't stop anyone else from getting it. Also, most other STDs are prevelant in straight people equally as much as anyone else. Less actually in lesbians.
 
Last edited:

bcp

In My Opinion
I mean if a gay guy came up to you and said 'hey baby' (or whatever things gay guys say to men), and you said 'I'm straight' then presumably he would then leave you alone.

Im pretty sure that my response would not be, Im straight.
it might be, "Get the F*#@ away from me you sick bastage"

unless I had been drinking a bit up to that point, then I might just look at him for a second or two, then crack him in the head with my beer bottle.

its hard to tell. but, Im pretty sure that it would piss me off just as much today as it did years ago back in Norfolk.
 

Xaquin44

New Member
Im pretty sure that my response would not be, Im straight.
it might be, "Get the F*#@ away from me you sick bastage"

unless I had been drinking a bit up to that point, then I might just look at him for a second or two, then crack him in the head with my beer bottle.

its hard to tell. but, Im pretty sure that it would piss me off just as much today as it did years ago back in Norfolk.

wow .... so you would be a huge jerk and commit assault and battery because some guy hit on you.

you have problems sir.

but assuming a gay guy hit on you .... how would that in any way hurt you or affect your life, aside from having to say two words to clear up a misunderstanding?
 

tommyjones

New Member
wow .... so you would be a huge jerk and commit assault and battery because some guy hit on you.

you have problems sir.

but assuming a gay guy hit on you .... how would that in any way hurt you or affect your life, aside from having to say two words to clear up a misunderstanding?

"well, being a homophobe, i would have to beat him to within an inch of his life or i would be no better than that F@g, hell, just standing next to me he might give me aids, or even worse, make me want men!!!"
 

Xaquin44

New Member
"well, being a homophobe, i would have to beat him to within an inch of his life or i would be no better than that F@g, hell, just standing next to me he might give me aids, or even worse, make me want men!!!"

haha before I saw the poster name, I just assumed it was bcp being honest for once and was going to argue lol
 

Xaquin44

New Member
when have I not been honest on this thread?
or are you making more of your false assumptions.

oh I was kidding around (hence "hehe" and "lol").

You didn't answer my assault statement. Am I to assume you'd rather risk arrest then tell a gay person that you're not intrested?
 

bcp

In My Opinion
"well, being a homophobe, i would have to beat him to within an inch of his life or i would be no better than that F@g, hell, just standing next to me he might give me aids, or even worse, make me want men!!!"
certainly seems to be something that went wrong causing you to lust after the male models in the underwear section of the sunday paper so many years ago.
 

Xaquin44

New Member
certainly seems to be something that went wrong causing you to lust after the male models in the underwear section of the sunday paper so many years ago.

wow! baseless claims!

can I play too?

ummm lets see here .... looking at his posts we can only assume bcp is some sort of self aware lesbian hippopotamus.

the catch is that she is gay for llamas.
 

bcp

In My Opinion
wow! baseless claims!

can I play too?


ummm lets see here .... looking at his posts we can only assume bcp is some sort of self aware lesbian hippopotamus.

the catch is that she is gay for llamas.

you have been playing all along, now, where have I not been truthful in this thread?

as far as the rest of your theory,
lets see, I do prefer women so, I suppose I would be much closer to lesbian than rump ranger.
I am a little overweight, but seriously, to refer to me as a hippo?

and, they are female llamas right?

you ever had relations with a llama?
 

Xaquin44

New Member
you have been playing all along, now, where have I not been truthful in this thread?

uh huh .... show me where.

if wrong equals not truthful, then, several posts.

edit: and you still haven't addressed my assault question.
 
Last edited:

ItalianScallion

Harley Rider
so what? its a private club. I certainly would not be upset if the homosexuals had a double secret club that I couldnt join.
Exactly bcp. I remember when the Purple Moose (I think) at Ocean City many years ago was a gay bar. As I walked past there in my bathing suit, I saw only males in there and a few of them made comments. I just laughed and kept walking. I didn't have the slightest desire to start a legal battle so I could go in there because I didn't have an agenda. Why do the gays want sooo much to become scout leaders? (you 2 blind mice). Open your eyes and see the Michael Jackson syndrome here! Remember him and his boy scout fettish? The devil has those 2 totally blinded bcp, and yet they keep on defending them. Why do you guys think they are harmless? Why then does the government require pedophiles to register their location? After all, they're harmless when at home? GEEZZZ!
Go to the BSA recruiting website and look at the defination of morally straight.
"To be a person of strong character, your relationships with others should be honest and open. You should respect and defend the rights of all people."
ALL people.
not some people. not all people except homosexuals. ALL people.
bear in mind, that this is directly from the BSA defination of morally straight.
And the ignorance continues... So why not let pedophiles, rapists & wife beaters become leaders too? They're "all people". You can't be serious. bcp I think we're being taken for a ride here. NO ONE can be this blind, but then....
 

Xaquin44

New Member
Exactly bcp. I remember when the Purple Moose (I think) at Ocean City many years ago was a gay bar. As I walked past there in my bathing suit, I saw only males in there and a few of them made comments. I just laughed and kept walking. I didn't have the slightest desire to start a legal battle so I could go in there because I didn't have an agenda. Why do the gays want sooo much to become scout leaders? (you 2 blind mice). Open your eyes and see the Michael Jackson syndrome here! Remember him and his boy scout fettish? The devil has those 2 totally blinded bcp, and yet they keep on defending them. Why do you guys think they are harmless? Why then does the government require pedophiles to register their location? After all, they're harmless when at home? GEEZZZ!

you could have gone in if you wanted to.

edit: and the devil has not blinded me .... rather I'm in support of jesus and his love for ALL people.

edit again: "Why do you guys think they are harmless?" Because they are ....

and "Why then does the government require pedophiles to register their location?" Pedophiles =/= gay

And the ignorance continues... So why not let pedophiles, rapists & wife beaters become leaders too? They're "all people". You can't be serious. bcp I think we're being taken for a ride here. NO ONE can be this blind, but then....

you are very stupid. "pedophiles, rapists & wife beaters" are all criminals .... it isn't a crime to be homosexual.
 
Last edited:

ItalianScallion

Harley Rider
you could have gone in if you wanted to.
That's not my point. My point was their having an agenda which I didn't have.
Xaquin44 said:
edit: and the devil has not blinded me .... rather I'm in support of jesus and his love for ALL people.
edit again: "Why do you guys think they are harmless?" Because they are ....
and "Why then does the government require pedophiles to register their location?" Pedophiles =/= gay
you are very stupid. "pedophiles, rapists & wife beaters" are all criminals .... it isn't a crime to be homosexual.
Thank you. Your negative towards me is a positive affirmation from God.
Not a crime to be gay? In your eyes maybe. How you conveniently ignore God's laws when it fits your agenda. So what's your take on why He destroyed 2 cities FULL of homosexuals if it wasn't a crime??
 

Xaquin44

New Member
That's not my point. My point was their having an agenda which I didn't have.

agenda?

what are you blathering about?

Thank you. Your negative towards me is a positive affirmation from God. Not a crime to be gay? In your eyes maybe. How you conveniently ignore God's laws when it fits your agenda. So what's your take on why He destroyed 2 cities FULL of homosexuals if it wasn't a crime??

Actually, murder is a crime. good job god ....

fortunatly, we live in more enlightened times where someone being different doesn't result in mass murder.
 

Ken King

A little rusty but not crusty
PREMO Member
its a private club.

Since when does a private club have a Federal Charter? The BSA has such a charter and is recognized as a National Organization as codified in law at 36USC309. This organization’s purpose is designed to promote, through organization, and cooperation with other agencies, the ability of boys to do things for themselves and others, to train them in scoutcraft, and to teach them patriotism, courage, self-reliance, and kindred virtues. Thusly, this federally charted organization has been given exclusive rights to emblems, badges, descriptive or designating marks, and words or phrases the corporation adopts without requirement of copyright or trademark. Furthermore other Federal agencies can and are encouraged to gift or sell obsolete or surplus equipment to them that are not available to other clubs (Girl Scouts receive the same privilege). Additionally the organization is required not later than April 1 of each year, to submit a report to Congress on the activities of the corporation during the prior calendar year. Is there another private group required to do anything similar? I think not.

Now as to the argument that gay boys cannot be scouts based on their requirement to be morally straight, if one thinks about this for just a moment you will see that it is biased at best and hypocritical to boot as those that have had heterosexual relationships out of wedlock should also be viewed as something other than morally straight. The policy should be that any scout engaging in sexual activity, whether with man, woman, or beast, fails the morally straight requirement.
 

ItalianScallion

Harley Rider
agenda?
what are you blathering about?
Actually, murder is a crime. good job god ....
fortunatly, we live in more enlightened times where someone being different doesn't result in mass murder.
:confused::banghead: :whack::bonk: :shocking::jameo::doh: Enough said. You need a serious "veil removal" 2 Corinthians 3 v 14-16. I think we're done here. Until our next meeting...:peace:
 
Top