I have no doubt that was the idea, but it pains me to think someone in SCOTUS leaked it. I don’t think that’s ever happened before and that’s saying a lot coming from a town that leaks like a sieve.Well that's one way to save the mid-terms for the Democrat Party.
I have no doubt that was the idea, but it pains me to think someone in SCOTUS leaked it. I don’t think that’s ever happened before and that’s saying a lot coming from a town that leaks like a sieve.
Maybe a clerk leaked, don't believe it would have been a Justis or a jr attorney,, if so disbarment will follow.I have no doubt that was the idea, but it pains me to think someone in SCOTUS leaked it. I don’t think that’s ever happened before and that’s saying a lot coming from a town that leaks like a sieve.
It'll be one of very few times they properly left something back in the hands of the state.Is the 10th Amendment gonna shine here?
The draft opinion is a full-throated, unflinching repudiation of the 1973 decision which guaranteed federal constitutional protections of abortion rights and a subsequent 1992 decision – Planned Parenthood v. Casey – that largely maintained the right. “Roe was egregiously wrong from the start,” Alito writes.
“We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled,” he writes in the document, labeled as the “Opinion of the Court.” “It is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people’s elected representatives.”
Deliberations on controversial cases have in the past been fluid. Justices can and sometimes do change their votes as draft opinions circulate and major decisions can be subject to multiple drafts and vote-trading, sometimes until just days before a decision is unveiled. The court’s holding will not be final until it is published, likely in the next two months.