Yep, now maybe they can review the Marriage law they made and return that function back to the states. Then for good order declare the Gun Control Act and National Firearms Act as direct violations of the 2nd Amendment and void them.
Breaking: Abortion Rights Overturned
- Thread starter TPD
- Start date
“The left continues its assault on the Supreme Court with an unprecedented breach of confidentiality, clearly meant to intimidate,” tweeted Sen. Josh Hawley, Missouri Republican. “The Justices mustn’t give in to this attempt to corrupt the process. Stay strong.”
Sen. Marco Rubio, Florida Republican, said on Twitter, “The next time you hear the far left preaching about how they are fighting to preserve our Republic’s institutions & norms remember how they leaked a Supreme Court opinion in an attempt to intimidate the justices on abortion.”
Indeed, some liberals were applauding the leak.
Brian Fallon, executive director of the liberal activist group Demand Justice and former campaign aide to Hillary Clinton, said of the report: “Is a brave [law] clerk taking this unprecedented step of leaking a draft opinion to warn the country what’s coming in a last-ditch Hail Mary attempt to see if the public response might cause the Court to reconsider?”
But Mr. Blackman said the violation of court secrecy should become both a criminal matter and possibly even affect the court’s membership.
“Heads must roll. Clerks cannot fall on their swords to save their bosses. Anyone implicated … should be referred to the Department of Justice for potential criminal activity, including theft of government property. And now there may actually be a need for impeachment proceedings. If Roberts cannot resolve this situation, he must resign,” the law professor said.
www.washingtontimes.com
Sen. Marco Rubio, Florida Republican, said on Twitter, “The next time you hear the far left preaching about how they are fighting to preserve our Republic’s institutions & norms remember how they leaked a Supreme Court opinion in an attempt to intimidate the justices on abortion.”
Indeed, some liberals were applauding the leak.
Brian Fallon, executive director of the liberal activist group Demand Justice and former campaign aide to Hillary Clinton, said of the report: “Is a brave [law] clerk taking this unprecedented step of leaking a draft opinion to warn the country what’s coming in a last-ditch Hail Mary attempt to see if the public response might cause the Court to reconsider?”
But Mr. Blackman said the violation of court secrecy should become both a criminal matter and possibly even affect the court’s membership.
“Heads must roll. Clerks cannot fall on their swords to save their bosses. Anyone implicated … should be referred to the Department of Justice for potential criminal activity, including theft of government property. And now there may actually be a need for impeachment proceedings. If Roberts cannot resolve this situation, he must resign,” the law professor said.
Roe v. Wade leak called an effort to intimidate Supreme Court justices
The leaking of a Supreme Court draft opinion that would overturn the Roe v. Wade ruling on abortion prompted outrage Monday night including accusations by Republican senators of a liberal-left effort to intimidate the justices into changing their ruling.
Democrats Pounce, Call On Congress To Immediately Abolish Filibuster In Wake of SCOTUS Leak
The Hill reporter Julia Manchester shared a series of posts Monday evening that included breathless statements from varying Democrat politicians.
Mandela Barnes, Lt.Governor of Wisconsin and current candidate for U.S. Senate said:
You’ll note he was careful not to be prejudicial in supposing that only women have abortions. Every INDIVIDUAL…of course.
Pennsylvania Lt. Governor John Fetterman had this to say:
At least he was honest about his religion. The right to kill a baby is sacred to his party. It is better for everyone to be up front about their faith when it comes to politics.
Ohio representative Tim Ryan is a co-author of the “Women’s Health Protection Act” and issued this statement:
Democrats would do well to remember the power they seize today, will be in the hands of The GOP after November
Pelosi, Schumer Accuse Conservative Justices of Lying in Scathing Reaction to SCOTUS Leak
“Several of these conservative Justices, who are in no way accountable to the American people, have lied to the U.S. Senate, ripped up the Constitution and defiled both precedent and the Supreme Court’s reputation – all at the expense of tens of millions of women who could soon be stripped of their bodily autonomy and the constitutional rights they’ve relied on for half a century.
“The party of Lincoln and Eisenhower has now completely devolved into the party of Trump,” Schumer and Pelosi add. “Every Republican Senator who supported Senator McConnell and voted for Trump Justices pretending that this day would never come will now have to explain themselves to the American people.”
Democratic governors were equally “horrified” by the news.
"I am horrified by the apparent draft Supreme Court opinion leaked this evening that would overturn the right to abortion guaranteed by Roe v. Wade," Gov. Kathy Hochul, D-N.Y., said in a statement. "For the sake of women across the country, this should not be the Supreme Court's final opinion when it comes to abortion rights."
Who here has read "Freakonomics"?
I think people who are hard core anti-abortion are tunnel visioned and not looking at the big picture. They're thinking about that tiny infant, not the drain on society predator that baby will grow up to be, and then pop out 4 or 5 more just like him/her. Which is why our society is crumbling and crime/poverty is so rampant - not enough abortions.
The amusing part is that Democrats find themselves in yet another episode of cognitive dissonance. "Abortion is racist eugenics" vs. "Women should be able to kill their children." I think it was Al Sharpton who said, "Who says those kids will grow up to be criminals? Maybe they'll grow up to be like me?" To which most of us would respond, "God help us."
I think people who are hard core anti-abortion are tunnel visioned and not looking at the big picture. They're thinking about that tiny infant, not the drain on society predator that baby will grow up to be, and then pop out 4 or 5 more just like him/her. Which is why our society is crumbling and crime/poverty is so rampant - not enough abortions.
The amusing part is that Democrats find themselves in yet another episode of cognitive dissonance. "Abortion is racist eugenics" vs. "Women should be able to kill their children." I think it was Al Sharpton who said, "Who says those kids will grow up to be criminals? Maybe they'll grow up to be like me?" To which most of us would respond, "God help us."
Well, they also think free speech is a threat to democracy, so.......
glhs837
Power with Control
Then they obviously have not repeated it often enough.
Uh... Isn't a con-man a criminal?
This is one of the few times that I have to disagree with you, Vrai. There is no way of knowing what an aborted fetus would have turned into. There are plenty of examples in this country of people born to poor families and whose future was bleak at best and then succeeded in spite of those obstacles.
The Mississippi law at issue says that up to 15 weeks gestation there are no restrictions on getting an abortion and then afterwards if there should be a danger to the mother or severe abnormality of the fetus an abortion can still be done. So how can this be viewed as a ban on abortions?
black dog
Free America
Im not so sure Sanger, Kellogg and many others were really all that wrong.
It works well in nature...
black dog
Free America
I give you Ben Carson and Hunter Biden.
Hijinx
Well-Known Member
Well it isn't. But it would stop the harvesting of organs from a fetus before they were of use to the butchers .
A bit like picking a fruit before it is ripe. The harvesters want these organs to be fully developed before they kill the baby and take their organs for use by "Doctors"
Clem72
Well-Known Member
If it was an aide (and I'm sure it will be pinned on one) whose to say they have a law license, and if it's a justice I don't believe they need one to be elected and certainly it isn't a constitutional requirement of the job so they would laugh off any attempt.