BREAKING NEWS: Scooter Libby verdict about to be announced

I

Inkpen

Guest
OK..he did the crime, but will he do the time and/or pay the fine?
 

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
PsyOps said:
At noon today.

I thought it was kinda weird that the jury was still confused as of yesterday just WHAT the hell he was being tried for.


Yeah, me too.
 

Pete

Repete
ylexot said:
I'm still wondering if he outed a covert agent :shrug:
The story says he wasn't even accused of it by prosecutors. They know who did it, it was Armitege.
 

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
ylexot said:
I'm still wondering if he outed a covert agent :shrug:

That's just it - he didn't "out" anyone, and the person fails any definition of "covert". That's not what he was tried for.

Now the person who DID out them - he's not being tried for anything, and the Justice Department KNEW who that person was - before they began investigating.
 

Pete

Repete
SamSpade said:
I thought it was kinda weird that the jury was still confused as of yesterday just WHAT the hell he was being tried for.


Yeah, me too.
He was convicted of lying in the investigation of a non crime.
 

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
Pete said:
The story says he wasn't even accused of it by prosecutors. They know who did it, it was Armitege.

What gets me is, they KNEW this before they even started.
 

Pete

Repete
SamSpade said:
What gets me is, they KNEW this before they even started.
And Libby deserves to go to jail for 1. Lying and 2. Lying for something he didn't even do.
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
SamSpade said:
That's just it - he didn't "out" anyone, and the person fails any definition of "covert". That's not what he was tried for.

Now the person who DID out them - he's not being tried for anything, and the Justice Department KNEW who that person was - before they began investigating.
I do not understand this case. I've tried reading about it but the story goes round and round. I know Scooter Libby was on trial for perjury and obstruction, not for outing a supposedly covert agent. What I don't understand is the rigamarole that went into determining whether he lied or not.

Is there a good, simple source? The news sites are no help because they go round and round as well - give you a bit and piece, assuming you know the background, then you have to look up the background, which puts you right back where you started.

:jameo:
 
Top