I think the biggest reason to speculate here that she died of either an eating disorder or drugs (or perhaps even a combination of both) are the reports that her husband didn’t want an autopsy. I find the entire autopsy process disgusting, cutting up a body to pieces that way. But, had my loved one died suddenly and nobody was sure why, I’d support doing an autopsy, 100%. And, I would encourage my family to do the same if I died suddenly and nobody knew why. You just never know… she could have contracted some sort of rare and/or contagious illness and if knowing this could save other people’s lives that had been in contact with her, than it is important to do. But the reports that he just said no, right off the bat, if true he actually said that, makes me think he knows more than he has let on in all of this. I never liked that creep she was married to anyway (not that I have an accurate judge of character myself because I have more than proven I don’t). But, I remember the first time I saw a picture of the two together, my first thought was yuck, she married a butt ass ugly old man and when I read more about him (thinking she must have married him for his money), I learned that many believed him to be nothing but a broke con-man. He sure has the history to support that judgment, but I guess he said all the right things. :shrug: Anyway, my sister died at age 31 and the 1st cause of death was heart failure, but she had the medical documentation in her past to support what seemed like a sudden death to outsiders. She had asthma and premature developed lungs only working at 40 percent capacity. There was no real reason for our family to have an autopsy done. When you just don’t know why, I cannot imagine why anyone wouldn’t support having an autopsy done, unless you are trying to hide something.
