This is hilarious. I bet they don't force the people with Chinese names to use their birth names rather than their anglicized ones on the English language ballots. You know, like Connie Chan (real name 陳詩敏), the very person who complained about non-Chinese using Chinese names.SF Chinese American Candidates Outraged at Name Regulation
More than 30 self-submitted Chinese names are likely to be rejected.sfstandard.com
Hughes left a suicide note in her car accusing Brenda Lopez, Environmental Health assistant director, for her death. She accused Lopez, uniformly disliked by co-workers, of bullying, harassment, and not taking her needs and complaints about the division seriously.
Concerned for the welfare of others, Hughes chose to jump onto the parking structure instead of the plaza where passers-by could have been hurt. A selfless last act.
According to one account, just before her fatal plunge, a maintenance worker on the roof implored Hughes to step back from the ledge. A moment later, to his absolute horror, she jumped. Colleagues of Hughes also shockingly witnessed her fall event from their office windows.
Ironically, the health department’s Suicide Prevention Department is housed in the same building.
...He told the store clerk that Proposition 47 made theft of goods with a value over $950 into a felony and that is one of the lowest thresholds in the nation.
Newsom said, 'By the way, it's the 10th toughest in America. Look it up. No one gives a damn about that. She said, 'Well, we still don't stop them because of the governor.''
...And it was $380 later, and I was like, 'Why am I spending $380, everyone can walk the hell right out,'' he said.
When state legislators passed a 2014 law banning single-use plastic bags, the hope was that it would notably reduce the amount of discarded plastic. But fast-forward nearly a decade: Californians are tossing more pounds of plastic bags than before the legislation was passed.
That’s according to a recent report by the consumer advocacy group CALPIRG, which took population changes into account and found the tonnage of discarded bags rose from 4.08 per 1,000 people in 2014 to 5.89 per 1,000 people in 2022.
How could this happen?
As Susanne Rust reported this week, plastic bag manufacturers replaced one kind of plastic bag for another. You’ve probably noticed them at grocery stores or had them loaded into your car during a drive-up order. These newer bags are thicker and meet technical specifications to be called “reusable.”
As Jenn Engstrom, CALPIRG’S state director, explained to Susanne, the switch created a loophole because the newer bags — which typically cost 10 cents — “are clearly not being reused and don’t look like reusable bags and … just circumvent the law’s intent.”
‘It was just emerging in the marketplace, but it happened to be made by a couple of California companies … which the manufacturers claimed they could certify as being reusable,’ he added.
Since the bags were made from 20 percent recyclable material and recyclable, Murray said, ‘we said, all right, fine. We’re gonna put that specific criteria into the law.’ But he claimed that experiment ‘failed.’
Mark Gold, director of Water Scarcity Solutions, who worked on the original legislation, described the move as a ‘gaping hole’ in the law.
These reusable bags, made of the material called HDPE, are ‘thicker and heavier’ than the LDPE plastic bags used previously.
(c) A law enforcement agency may request that an Ebony Alert be activated if that agency determines that an Ebony Alert would be an effective tool in the investigation of missing Black youth, including a young woman or girl. The law enforcement agency may consider the following factors to make that determination:
(1) The missing person is between 12 to 25 years of age, inclusive.
(2) The missing person suffers from a mental or physical disability.
(3) The person is missing under circumstances that indicate any of the following:
(A) The missing person’s physical safety may be endangered.
(B) The missing person may be subject to trafficking.
(4) The law enforcement agency determines that the person has gone missing under unexplained or suspicious circumstances.
(5) The law enforcement agency believes that the person is in danger because of age, health, mental or physical disability, or environment or weather conditions, that the person is in the company of a potentially dangerous person, or that there are other factors indicating that the person may be in peril.
(6) The investigating law enforcement agency has utilized available local resources.
(7) There is information available that, if disseminated to the public, could assist in the safe recovery of the missing person.
California Workers SHOCKED As Businesses SHUTDOWN, & Prices RISE IMMEDIATELY After Minimum Wage Hike
Cali's 'Ebony Alerts' Are Unconstitutional (and You Won't Believe What They Have For Native Americans)
As of this writing there are over 34 million views and that’s probably good. But at least some of the views were probably generated by the shock that there is such a thing as an Ebony Alert. And an Ebony Alert is what you might guess: Something like an Amber Alert that is only issued when the missing youth is black.
But first, let’s talk about what the Constitution says. This is one of those situations where the ordinary meaning of a word is different from how it is understood in the law. In ordinary parlance, ‘discrimination’ means to treat people differently according to an unjust factor such as race. But in constitutional law, 'discrimination' means literally to classify—even if the government does nothing with that classification. If the government just keeps a list of who is black, white or whatever, but still treats everyone otherwise equally, that is racial discrimination.
Furthermore, in constitutional law, not all discrimination is illegal or wrong. After all, the government discriminates, classifies people and things all the all the time. To give one example, a regulatory scheme might rightfully treat bus drivers differently than airline pilots—setting up different standards for health, eyesight and proficiency, for instance. Or in a more basic way, two people might both be tried for murder and one person might go free, while the other is convicted and punished. Even if that is based on nothing more than the evidence, that is still discrimination, still classification, between a person proven guilty, versus a person who is not.
What the Supreme Court has said is the discrimination is considered more or less suspicious, depending on what factors are being considered. Discrimination against disabled people is not considered very suspicious at all, to pick one example. Discrimination against women or illegitimate status is more suspicious. And the most suspicious of all is discrimination based on race. Therefore, any discrimination, any classification, based on race has to be narrowly tailored to serve a compelling interest. It is exceedingly rare for any kind of discrimination to pass that test.
Thus we come back to this idea of Ebony Alerts. This concept is actually written into California state law. Specifically, it's in Cal. Gov. Code § 8594.14. There’s a lot there but here are the criteria:
One thing to understand when you read the law is the code words often used by the legislature. For instance, if a law says someone shall do something, that is almost always interpreted as saying that the person has no choice in the matter. But the word ‘may’ is almost always permissive. You may do it, but you don’t have to.
So, bluntly, no law enforcement agency has to do any of this, and we think they should refuse to do it because it violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. There is nothing in the Amber Alert system that excludes black people, even if they also qualify for Ebony Alerts, so they should stick to the Amber Alert system.
But more insidiously, all those factors mentioned in the Ebony Alert laws like disability status, age and so on are optional, too (‘The law enforcement agency may consider the following factors’). The only criteria that must be present is 1) that the law enforcement agency determines that would be an effective tool the in the investigation and 2) that the person be a black youth—whatever that means.
Further, as the title to this article promised, they don’t just have an Ebony Alert for young black people who are missing. Nope, they also have one for Native Americans in Cal. Gov. Code § 8594.13. And it uses a heck of a term: Feather Alert.
No, we are not making this up. We wish we were, but we aren’t.
California Democrats Introduce Bill That Would Force Homeowners and Renters to Disclose Number of Firearms to Insurance Companies, Government
The questions include information as to the number of firearms in the home, the method of storage, and how many firearms are stored in vehicles on the property. The questions include whether or not the firearms are in locked containers or not.
This is a direct assault on the Second Amendment rights in the state. As many of you know, this also is the first step in gun confiscation – identifying where the guns are located.
Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk pointed out that the State of California is attacking gun owners while letting rampant crime and child exploitation go unchecked.
“California couldn’t care less about retail theft, child mutilation, infanticide, or illegals breaking into America, but it feels entitled to harass law abiding gun owners. Will California use this database to punish gun owners?” Kirk said on X.