Originally posted by Kain99
Ever ask yourself why you, "Don't Care?"
I just told you. Because it does not affect me, my money, nor my family; and as far as I see, no one else either.
Originally posted by Kain99
Ever ask yourself why you, "Don't Care?"
Originally posted by vraiblonde
ST, don't you ever get bored baiting people with your pretzel logic? Please show me where Ehrlich has had anything to do with what the Wash Post prints.
Again I say, anyone who thinks this is a big deal is a petty person with too much time on their hands. Wake me up when Ehrlich does something more scandalous than refusing to talk to the press. *yawn*
Originally posted by http
Its not that I don't like the story, I REALLY couldn't care!!!!! REALLY!!!!!
Originally posted by http
I just told you. Because it does not affect me, my money, nor my family; and as far as I see, no one else either.
Originally posted by http
Just in case you're wondering, I won't be back for anymore responses. This is just as worthwhile and exciting as watching a bowl of soup cool. I tried, you win.
Originally posted by http
Just in case you're wondering, I won't be back for anymore responses. This is just as worthwhile and exciting as watching a bowl of soup cool. I tried, you win.
NOW you get it! And not a moment too soon - some people have been sucked into nonsensical arguments like this and never been seen again!Originally posted by http
Just in case you're wondering, I won't be back for anymore responses. This is just as worthwhile and exciting as watching a bowl of soup cool. I tried, you win.
Originally posted by http
No, the thread I care about (used to at least). The article, NO, I DON'T. Man do you confuse things. Do you take medicine for that?
Originally posted by vraiblonde
NOW you get it! And not a moment too soon - some people have been sucked into nonsensical arguments like this and never been seen again!
Ehrlich can do it but is it politically wise? I would say, "no," because it generates discussions like this where a lot of people, regardless of their politics find his attitude offensive.Originally posted by SmallTown
Perhaps Kain would have been better off saying "Should Ehrlich Do this" as opposed to "Can Ehrlich do this"
Originally posted by http
Just in case you're wondering, I won't be back for anymore responses. This is just as worthwhile and exciting as watching a bowl of soup cool. I tried, you win.
Originally posted by http
No, the thread I care about (used to at least). The article, NO, I DON'T. Man do you confuse things. Do you take medicine for that?
Originally posted by http
Man do you confuse things. Do you take medicine for that?
Originally posted by SmallTown
since you obviously didn't read the article, i'll post what the issue is.
" Any reporter who quotes Paulson in print or on the air will be shunned for seven days by Ehrlich's Republican administration.
No comments, no phone calls returned, no exceptions.
"
Originally posted by Frank
Have you ever heard of a politician ever say, "I'm not going to answer that question"? What, you think that is 'silencing' the press?
Originally posted by SmallTown
And if Ehrlich has his way, there won't be any press members present to ask the question in the first place.
God, could we be that lucky? Especially those morons over at the Post - what an embarrassment.Originally posted by SmallTown
And if Ehrlich has his way, there won't be any press members present to ask the question in the first place.
Originally posted by vraiblonde
God, could we be that lucky? Especially those morons over at the Post - what an embarrassment.
Ehrlich's damned if he does, damned if he doesn't. Period.