Can you believe it...

[Pete]

I do get that point. My objective is that when I get to the Maryland Legislature then I am going to change the laws and make them right. Bring justice to our system and take that ignorance out. Surely I do understand that at present they are wrong and I do know that, duh. That is what is called the lynch mob mentality where the majority think they are right and our present leaders do not have the stomach to stand up to the mob and tell them that they are wrong. I will put a stop to it because those biligerant slanders do not sway me as it does others.

----------------------------------

Can you point me to one reference in an official Maryland Government statute, regulation, court opinion, official publication, leaflet, pamphlet or matchbook cover where the Government of Maryland uses the term "deadbeat"?

On another note can you tell me what EXACTLY is wrong with the laws requiring the sprem donor to equally support his children?

Can you tell me EXACTLY why 99.9999999999% of people think that people who produce children should support them are ignorant and unjust and you being the .000000000001% are the one who has it right?

 

[JPC, Sr.]

The Truth Shall Set Us All Free.

Can you point me to one reference in an official Maryland Government statute, regulation, court opinion, official publication, leaflet, pamphlet or matchbook cover where the Government of Maryland uses the term "deadbeat"?

The State of Maryland does not refer to parents that brake their law as "deadbeat moms / dads" and I never said that they do. The State officials use to say it but even that stopped some years ago. It is only the misinformed and petty citizenry and News sources that unjustly us that term to describe the separated parents. On this forum I have tried to explain to them of their ignorance and that is all. Thus the lynch mob mentality and no official presently with the guts to speak up against the slander. It is others on here that preach their "deadbeat crap" so ask them where their petty opinions really come from.

On another note can you tell me what EXACTLY is wrong with the laws requiring the sprem donor to equally support his children?

I have never known of any sperm donor. If you equate a father with sperm donor then the ignorance is only in your own mind and thus that is where the wrong is. That is EXACTLY what is wrong.

Can you tell me EXACTLY why 99.9999999999% of people think that people who produce children should support them are ignorant and unjust and you being the .000000000001% are the one who has it right?

Because right and wrong is not based on majority vote except when injustice is the rule. The lynch mob mentality makes people guilty because of majority vote and since we have no strong leaders then I myself want to tell the blind and uninformed mob that they are creating a bigger wrong and it needs to be stopped.

-------------------

 

[MMDad]

I do get that point. My objective is that when I get to the Maryland Legislature then I am going to change the laws and make them right. Bring justice to our system and take that ignorance out. Surely I do understand that at present they are wrong and I do know that, duh. That is what is called the lynch mob mentality where the majority think they are right and our present leaders do not have the stomach to stand up to the mob and tell them that they are wrong. I will put a stop to it because those biligerant slanders do not sway me as it does others.

----------------------------------

In an earlier post you stated that the laws did not need to be changed, but now you say they do. Did you forget to take your medicine?

Answer one basic question: If a parent refuses to pay child support, what would you do about it?

 

[MMDad]

The State of Maryland does not refer to parents that brake their law as "deadbeat moms / dads" and I never said that they do. The State officials use to say it but even that stopped some years ago. It is only the misinformed and petty citizenry and News sources that unjustly us that term to describe the separated parents. On this forum I have tried to explain to them of their ignorance and that is all. Thus the lynch mob mentality and no official presently with the guts to speak up against the slander. It is others on here that preach their "deadbeat crap" so ask them where their petty opinions really come from.

I have never known of any sperm donor. If you equate a father with sperm donor then the ignorance is only in your own mind and thus that is where the wrong is. That is EXACTLY what is wrong.

Because right and wrong is not based on majority vote except when injustice is the rule. The lynch mob mentality makes people guilty because of majority vote and since we have no strong leaders then I myself want to tell the blind and uninformed mob that they are creating a bigger wrong and it needs to be stopped.

-------------------

Your hero, Slick Willy Clinton, called people like you deadbeats. Live with it.

 

[Pete]

The State of Maryland does not refer to parents that brake their law as "deadbeat moms / dads" and I never said that they do. The State officials use to say it but even that stopped some years ago. It is only the misinformed and petty citizenry and News sources that unjustly us that term to describe the separated parents. On this forum I have tried to explain to them of their ignorance and that is all. Thus the lynch mob mentality and no official presently with the guts to speak up against the slander. It is others on here that preach their "deadbeat crap" so ask them where their petty opinions really come from.

So as the all powerful delegate to the legislature representing the "petty citizenry" of 29B, you plan is to pass a law forbidding people and the press from "thinking" and "saying" that people who do not pay their ordered child support are "deadbeats"?

I have never known of any sperm donor. If you equate a father with sperm donor then the ignorance is only in your own mind and thus that is where the wrong is. That is EXACTLY what is wrong.

I refered to "sperm/egg donor" as those who sire/deliver a child then do not provide for its support even when ordered to do so by a court via due process. You know that yet you STILL dodged the question. What EXACTLY is unjust or wrong with Maryland laws forcing parents to support their children after they have shown that they will not willingly?

Because right and wrong is not based on majority vote except when injustice is the rule. The lynch mob mentality makes people guilty because of majority vote and since we have no strong leaders then I myself want to tell the blind and uninformed mob that they are creating a bigger wrong and it needs to be stopped.

Once again you dodged the question. What EXACTLY is wrong with requiring the separated parents from providing support for their children?


I have to tell you as a member of the "petty citizenry" of 29B I cannot find a single coherent explanation of your positions other than complaining.

I will give you one last time to answer my questions with EXACTLY what I asked. If you do not I will be forced to take extreme measures.

 

[JPC, Sr.]

The Truth Shall Set Us All Free.

In an earlier post you stated that the laws did not need to be changed, but now you say they do. Did you forget to take your medicine?

No where did I say that the child support laws did not need changed. It is part of my fundamental ptatform from the very beginning. To reform child support and make it family friendly. If any one is in doubt of my position then do please refer to my campaign website and do not believe hear-say.

Answer one basic question: If a parent refuses to pay child support, what would you do about it?

Since there are millions of parents all accross this whole USA that do not pay the unjust demands then we could listen to those parents that vote with their actions and not with petty words and so we must change the laws so they are right and just. Truth and justice use to be the American way and I intend to bring the truth and justice back to child support in Maryland. To keep trying to force the injustice will never make the injustice right. Instead we have parents turned into criminals and deadbroke parents in jails because people will not let go of that ignorant lynch mob mentality.

-----------------------

 

[MMDad]

No where did I say that the child support laws did not need changed. It is part of my fundamental ptatform from the very beginning. To reform child support and make it family friendly. If any one is in doubt of my position then do please refer to my campaign website and do not believe hear-say.

Since there are millions of parents all accross this whole USA that do not pay the unjust demands then we could listen to those parents that vote with their actions and not with petty words and so we must change the laws so they are right and just. Truth and justice use to be the American way and I intend to bring the truth and justice back to child support in Maryland. To keep trying to force the injustice will never make the injustice right. Instead we have parents turned into criminals and deadbroke parents in jails because people will not let go of that ignorant lynch mob mentality.

-----------------------

HEY DUMBASS ANSWER THE F**CKING QUESTION!

"Answer one basic question: If a parent refuses to pay child support, what would you do about it?"

 

[JPC, Sr.]

The Truth Shall Set Us All Free.

So as the all powerful delegate to the legislature representing the "petty citizenry" of 29B, you plan is to pass a law forbidding people and the press from "thinking" and "saying" that people who do not pay their ordered child support are "deadbeats"?

I certainly never said that all of the citizens were petty. It is the mentality that needs to mature. No, I will not make so people can not keep calling names. I will show them why it is wrong and try to help correct the misguided.

I refered to "sperm/egg donor" as those who sire/deliver a child then do not provide for its support even when ordered to do so by a court via due process. You know that yet you STILL dodged the question. What EXACTLY is unjust or wrong with Maryland laws forcing parents to support their children after they have shown that they will not willingly?

You might not like the answer but I certainly did give the EXACTLY right answer. It is because the laws are wrong and enforcing laws that are wrong makes it double wrong. Those you pretend to be "sperm donors" is in my opinion the "alpha males" and I will fix the problem through the Legislature and if not then the problem will grow excessively, that is what I believe.

Once again you dodged the question. What EXACTLY is wrong with requiring the separated parents from providing support for their children?

It is that lynch mob mentality that is wrong. No parents are refusing to provide for their children. They are refusing to comply to unjust laws, and rightly so.

I have to tell you as a member of the "petty citizenry" of 29B I cannot find a single coherent explanation of your positions other than complaining.

I am not really complaining at all. I am doing some thing about it.

I will give you one last time to answer my questions with EXACTLY what I asked. If you do not I will be forced to take extreme measures.

I like extreme measurses so go ahead and take your best shot. Unless the above answers have got through and I hope they did.

----------------------------

 

[ylexot]

I certainly never said that all of the citizens were petty. It is the mentality that needs to mature. No, I will not make so people can not keep calling names. I will show them why it is wrong and try to help correct the misguided.

Ok, start with us. Why is making people provide for their children wrong?

You might not like the answer but I certainly did give the EXACTLY right answer. It is because the laws are wrong and enforcing laws that are wrong makes it double wrong. Those you pretend to be "sperm donors" is in my opinion the "alpha males" and I will fix the problem through the Legislature and if not then the problem will grow excessively, that is what I believe.

Again, what is wrong with the law? Answer the question already! How can the legislature prevent "alpha males" from being "alpha males"?

It is that lynch mob mentality that is wrong. No parents are refusing to provide for their children. They are refusing to comply to unjust laws, and rightly so.

Utter Parents ARE refusing to provide for their children.

 

[JPC, Sr.]

The Truth Will Set Us All Free.

Ok, start with us. Why is making people provide for their children wrong?

Because parents do provide for their children without any one else making them do it. The problem is thinking that the gov must be forcing parents as if the parents were sub-human which they are not. Thus the gov force is the wrong, and believing that they must be forced is another wrong.

Again, what is wrong with the law? Answer the question already! How can the legislature prevent "alpha males" from being "alpha males"?

There is no wrong in being an "alpha male" so we surely do not need to outlaw it. They and the alpha females are our strength and not a crime.

Utter Parents ARE refusing to provide for their children.

They really are not. They are refusing to comply with unjust laws, and rightly so.

----------------------

 

[ylexot]

Because parents do provide for their children without any one else making them do it. The problem is thinking that the gov must be forcing parents as if the parents were sub-human which they are not. Thus the gov force is the wrong, and believing that they must be forced is another wrong.

The law does not get involved until the parent refuses to provide for their child.

There is no wrong in being an "alpha male" so we surely do not need to outlaw it. They and the alpha females are our strength and not a crime.

Those you pretend to be "sperm donors" is in my opinion the "alpha males" and I will fix the problem through the Legislature and if not then the problem will grow excessively

Reconcile those two statements because they are at odds with one another.

They really are not. They are refusing to comply with unjust laws, and rightly so.

again. The law does not get involved until the parent refuses to provide for their child.

 

[MMDad]

The law does not get involved until the parent refuses to provide for their child.

Reconcile those two statements because they are at odds with one another.
again. The law does not get involved until the parent refuses to provide for their child.

Ever feel like you are talking to a wall? He won't answer the most basic questions.

 

[JPC, Sr.]

The Truth Shall Set Us All Free.

The law does not get involved until the parent refuses to provide for their child.

That is not a true declaration. The truth is that the parent only refuses to comply to the unjust laws. Their children are all provided for. It is only the child support laws that do without. The law gets involved when the parent refuses to comply to the unjust child support law.

Reconcile those two statements because they are at odds with one another.

Your question is incoherant to me. I see those two statements at perfect agreement with each other. Where is the odds??????

again. The law does not get involved until the parent refuses to provide for their child.

The parents are only refusing to pay a crooked law, not refusing their children. The children are all provided for. It is only the unjust laws that are lacking, and rightly so.

-----------------------------

 

[ylexot]

That is not a true declaration. The truth is that the parent only refuses to comply to the unjust laws.

Wrong. The government does not track whether a parent provides for a child unless the other parent (i.e. your son's mother) says that you are not providing. If the parent that is actually providing care does not care that you are not providing, the government does not get involved.

Your question is incoherant to me. I see those two statements at perfect agreement with each other. Where is the odds??????

I'm thinking that most logic is incoherent to you. I'll summarize using the smallest words I can so that maybe you will be able to understand:
Pete said, "I refered to "sperm/egg donor" as those who sire/deliver a child then do not provide for its support even when ordered to do so by a court via due process."
You said, "Those you pretend to be "sperm donors" is in my opinion the "alpha males" and I will fix the problem through the Legislature and if not then the problem will grow excessively". This means that you will fix the problem of "alpha males" (people who have children and don't provide) through the legislature...just in case you don't even understand what you write.
Then you said, "There is no wrong in being an "alpha male" so we surely do not need to outlaw it. They and the alpha females are our strength and not a crime."

"Alpha males" are either a problem that needs to be fixed in the Legislature (as you say in the first statement) or they "are our strength and not a crime" (as you say in the second statement).

 

[slik]

Oops - sorry library is closed... We'll have to wait to get his answers

 

[BS Gal]

There is no such thing as a "deadbeat parent" anywhere on the whole planet earth.

It is only unjust political slander that you are repeating.

--------------------

What term would you prefer instead of deadbeat parent? Sperm donor?

 

[missperky]

What term would you prefer instead of deadbeat parent? Sperm donor?

I use the word sperm donor for deadbeat dad.

 

[Tonio]

with many of them coming from the 29B voting district.

 

[ylexot]

What term would you prefer instead of deadbeat parent? Sperm donor?

My guess is that he wants to be called an "alpha male". The problem is that alpha males are the leaders of the packs because they are the biggest, strongest, and smartest which makes them the best protectors and providers for the pack. This is the exact opposite of JPC and his ilk.

Come to think of it, in the society of wolves, one with JPC's qualities would be the "omega male" and would be the lowest in the hierarchy. Also, he would not be allowed to breed. I like wolves

 

[JPC, Sr.]

The Truth Shall Set Us All Free.

What term would you prefer instead of deadbeat parent? Sperm donor?

I am trying to say that all the petty name calling is baseless and only unjust slander.

If the name calling stops and the real issues come in then we can see that with out the name calling there is no issue for you to stand on.

We have deadbroke parents in jail that have done nothing wrong. The name calling is childishly hiding the truth. The name calling only serves your ego and it produces the blind accusations but it is petty and cheap.

I want us to rise up to the ideal of truth and justice for our American way instead of child support that turns parents into criminals. I am going to put a stop to it.

-------------------------