This_person
Well-Known Member
This added to my thoughtsI doubt christian leaders then decried it as wrong (admittedly, I don't know) back then.
This added to my thoughtsI doubt christian leaders then decried it as wrong (admittedly, I don't know) back then.
But this was the one that started me thinking this way.until fairly recently christianity converted that way too.
But this was the one that started me thinking this way.
Fair enough.and then shortly after it was determined that I wasn't speaking about all christians (see post 9 or 10 I think).
Fair enough.
The ancient Christian issues were no different than the current Muslim ones - a few idiots acting in a way the majority would not defend or act on or encourage.
I do believe that President Bush is trying to bring that policy back, and into the 21st century.
The point was that Bush is trying to force his version of Christianity onto the Islamic Countries - particularly Iraq and Afghanistan, but others too.I don't know why I am wasting my time here, but here it goes... What policy is Bush proposing to force Christianity on us?
PsyOps didn't ask you to reiterate your baseless rhetoric, he asked you what policy it is. What action has been taken, specifically, which you are describing?The point was that Bush is trying to force his version of Christianity onto the Islamic Countries - particularly Iraq and Afghanistan, but others too.
But now that you mention it, Bush is making the USA act under his violent and bigoted Christian beliefs so he is forcing his Bush garbage onto us too.
So it is the Bush policies of war-mongering, and religious bigotry, social injustices, immoral violence, the Bush Christian doctrine of fear and hate thy fellow man.
Great question "Psy" because Bush is forcing his immoral version of Christianity onto us as he pushes it on the rest of the world.
If you look at my third (3rd) line then I did specifically say what policies.PsyOps didn't ask you to reiterate your baseless rhetoric, he asked you what policy it is. What action has been taken, specifically, which you are describing?
Great question "Psy" because Bush is forcing his immoral version of Christianity onto us as he pushes it on the rest of the world.
Your third line was:If you look at my third (3rd) line then I did specifically say what policies.
When the Bush administration commits immoral criminal acts prompted by his version of Christianity then we all share in his guilt.Bush has done nothing to push his religious values on me.
There are lots of other people that share my beliefs and a few hecklers on this Board does not represent virtually everbody.You however want to get elected so that you can make laws that are routed in your religious beliefs (that virtually nobody else has).
I am intolerant of wrong-doing and rightly so.Who is the intolerent one here?
When the Bush administration commits immoral criminal acts prompted by his version of Christianity then we all share in his guilt.
The dishonesty in going to war, the torture of prisoners, the continued occupation, and the murder of citizens in other Countries, these are a reflection of Bush's Christianity and we all in the USA now share in his guilt.
That is pushing his horrible version of Christianity onto us all. There are lots of other people that share my beliefs and a few hecklers on this Board does not represent virtually everbody.
This is why a candidates' religious beliefs do make a difference in many ways.
Bush is pro-life just as I am but Bush has a much lower regard for killing adults then what I have.
Hoyer believes in unrestricted abortions and I do not, so this is a reflection of Hoyer's and my religious beliefs. I am intolerant of wrong-doing and rightly so.
But I am not intolerant of persons or of other religions and not intolerant of rightful doings.
I certainly would not tolerate the Bush administration if I had the power to impeach the criminals and then prosecute the bunch of them.
Being tolerant of mistakes and errors I can do - but do not be tolerant of wrong-doing.
When the Bush administration commits immoral criminal acts prompted by his version of Christianity then we all share in his guilt.
The dishonesty in going to war, the torture of prisoners, the continued occupation, and the murder of citizens in other Countries, these are a reflection of Bush's Christianity and we all in the USA now share in his guilt.
That is pushing his horrible version of Christianity onto us all. There are lots of other people that share my beliefs and a few hecklers on this Board does not represent virtually everbody.
This is why a candidates' religious beliefs do make a difference in many ways.
Bush is pro-life just as I am but Bush has a much lower regard for killing adults then what I have.
Hoyer believes in unrestricted abortions and I do not, so this is a reflection of Hoyer's and my religious beliefs. I am intolerant of wrong-doing and rightly so.
But I am not intolerant of persons or of other religions and not intolerant of rightful doings.
I certainly would not tolerate the Bush administration if I had the power to impeach the criminals and then prosecute the bunch of them.
Being tolerant of mistakes and errors I can do - but do not be tolerant of wrong-doing.
There is no problem in deciding right and wrong, that is every person's job.You are the one deciding right and wrong, you are a damn hipocrite and a big one at that.
There is no problem in deciding right and wrong, that is every person's job.
The problem comes from those that claim wrong is right and claim right to be wrong, like Bush and Hoyer does.
I do not know what that "TYVM" means, so I hope it is not a way of saying some thing dirty.Do me a favor and remove yourself from the roles of registered Democrats once you've officially lost the primary next month. TYVM.
Okay, so thank you for informing me.It means Thank You Very Much.
Do me a favor and remove yourself from the roles of registered Democrats once you've officially lost the primary next month. TYVM.