itsbob said:
THis is what scares me.. why are congressman allowed to bypass security? Granted maybe they should have priviledge to not go through the public screeners, but they should still be made to go through screening, metal detectors, EVERYthing everyone else has to do.. they are not special, they are NOT supposed to be above the law, and because they convinced a bunch of idiots to vote for them they are supposed to be above breaking the law?? Oh yeah, that's been proven a few thousand times hasn't it?
Actually, I don't have a problem with this, as long as they have legitimate badges. And that's only because we have the same thing at my workplace - visitors and contractors have to go through security, badged employees don't.
This is also because you have to have a badged vehicle to get into the complex to begin with, coupled with the fact that nothing we work on is of grave consequence to national security. To get even further into the complex into Naval Intelligence, you have to be checked again, but I don't think they require everyone to go through a metal detector.
Occasionally we have have a$$holes here who think they don't need temporary badges when they forget theirs, because they think "the guard should KNOW them by now". He "knows" no such thing, and shouldn't. He's not being paid to make judgment calls. Had such a guard been in place in my former job, I might have used the opportunity to get in and *TRASH* the place, having been - as I felt - very unjustly canned. His only job is to enforce the rules, and arrogant people deserve to be treated like anyone else who flouts the rules.
Being arrogant is not justification for breaking security rules. Are we really supposed to believe that even IF THE GUY was *racist*, it's ok to simply sock him? How typical of extreme liberals - the "you're so beneath me you don't merit decent behavior" defense. She's an embarassment.