As Brit Hume stated... Guiliani showed great range...Steve said:Giuliani has won his own race, after that speech. THAT'S A PRESIDENTIAL candidate.
Just saw that...Steve said:Don King routing for Bush; imagine that. Just happened on Fox. "Four more years of Bush..." Although I would challenge him to spell 'four'...who knows...
sleuth said:As Brit Hume stated... Guiliani showed great range...
He was funny, serious, bipartisan, partisan, inspirational, attacking, rehearsed, off the cuff...
Outstanding speech. I'd love to see him run in '08!
I thought McCains speech was excellent.Pete said:I liked McCains speach. I was floored that Michael Moore was there. I suppose since he does "Documentaries" he is considered press?
Of the two men's speeches, I had to give the bigger thumbs up to Rudy Guiliani's effort. He managed to bring us back to 9/11 and give us a feel for what he saw and felt. It was almost, like one journalist said, as if he was in your living room talking to you personally.sleuth said:I thought McCains speech was excellent.
Fox News pundits were critical though... saying it did more for McCain than it did for Bush.
I love the stories Rudi told... the bearhug from the construction worker was one... and he threw in a couple more, too.penncam said:Of the two men's speeches, I had to give the bigger thumbs up to Rudy Guiliani's effort. He managed to bring us back to 9/11 and give us a feel for what he saw and felt. It was almost, like one journalist said, as if he was in your living room talking to you personally.
I also liked his points on who is best to have in the Oval Office: a man who will stay focused on what needs to be done, or one who shifts his position with each daily poll, or his own whim.
McCain gave a very passionate speech, I thought, but didn't reach out to me as personal as Rudy.
I think if Shrillary decides to run for the presidency in '08, she is going to have some very stiff competition from this man. JMHO
He ran against Hillary for the Senate seat but dropped out due to prostate cancer and a little matter of an ugly divorce/mistress.sleuth said:I love the stories Rudi told... the bearhug from the construction worker was one... and he threw in a couple more, too.
It was almost like you were sitting there drinkin' a beer with him.
And I hope he runs. I have heard nothing that would indicate he has an interest in it.
Christy said:Darn good speach by McCain.
Really? That was before I really started following politics, so I didn't know that.Pete said:He ran against Hillary for the Senate seat but dropped out due to prostate cancer and a little matter of an ugly divorce/mistress.
Pete said:I liked McCains speach. I was floored that Michael Moore was there. I suppose since he does "Documentaries" he is considered press?
Yep, that was about a week ago or so, that the USA Today passed on publishing Coulter's piece, and yet they send Michael Moore to cover the RNC?SamSpade said:Last I heard, he was covering the RNC for USA Today. The newspaper decided they wanted to do something *different* regarding coverage, putting Michael Moore in charge of covering the RNC, and Ann Coulter in charge of the DNC. It was supposed to be a day by day column, but they yanked Ann's FIRST column and didn't let her do it.
So much for "fair and balanced" (yeah I know it's USA Today and not FOX, but Ann's column that was never printed popped up in her column - it was vintage Ann, but nothing to get upset over, except that it was about as kind to Dems as Moore is likely to the Repubs).
Not much about the Convention in that article. He could have written it just as well from the crapper.ylexot said:Here's Moore's first article (for those that feel like reading it).
The GOP Doesn't Reflect America
I doubt that.Most (Republicans)...think assault weapons should be banned.
The difference of opinion is whether or not the fetus is it's own entity (and deserving of protection) or a part of the woman's body (can be aborted). Nobody is going to be against abortion, but against the government banning it (well, unless they are a moron).Though they may personally oppose abortion, they usually don't think the government has the right to tell a women what to do with her body.
I don't even know where he comes up with that one. Does it say in the party platform that women should be paid less?So why do they use the same label as those who back a status quo of women earning 75 cents to every dollar a man earns