Odd the animals family is coming out of the woodwork now saying he was a great guy. Michael Jackson would be proud. Not mentioning they wanted nothing to do with him prior.
They don't give a sht about him, they just want to hit the ghetto lottery.
Odd the animals family is coming out of the woodwork now saying he was a great guy. Michael Jackson would be proud. Not mentioning they wanted nothing to do with him prior.
Maybe they see a chance to get a buck out of it.Odd the animals family is coming out of the woodwork now saying he was a great guy. Michael Jackson would be proud. Not mentioning they wanted nothing to do with him prior.
Ya think?!!Maybe they see a chance to get a buck out of it.
In all the that time we were rolling around, the only time I recall taking a subway was in Montreal. The canucks do a good job of keeping their freaks in line. NYC could learn a thing or 2 from them.
Montreal has a great traffic light juggler to entertain drivers. That might qualify as a freak to some.I don't think they have freaks in Montreal. Remember that piano in the park? And the little nap loungers by the river? You can't have things like that in NYC.
I pretty much went through something like that in the 90s..11 of 12 were "Guilty" as it was clear about this guys crime, but we had one juror who was constant with 'Not Guilty'..2 days of going through everything over and over, she wouldn't budge..3rd day, she said okay with no explanation, I think she just wanted the days off work..I dunno, but her arguments for acquittal were asinine.It's stunning to me that this wasn't a go in the room, look at each other, foreman all, "So we good?" "Yeah, we good", then "We find the defendant not guilty."
I pretty much went through something like that in the 90s..11 of 12 were "Guilty" as it was clear about this guys crime, but we had one juror who was constant with 'Not Guilty'..2 days of going through everything over and over, she wouldn't budge..3rd day, she said okay with no explanation, I think she just wanted the days off work..I dunno, but her arguments for acquittal were asinine.
Maybe it should be like the Olympics and they don't count the vote of the most pro and most against juror.I pretty much went through something like that in the 90s..11 of 12 were "Guilty" as it was clear about this guys crime, but we had one juror who was constant with 'Not Guilty'..2 days of going through everything over and over, she wouldn't budge..3rd day, she said okay with no explanation, I think she just wanted the days off work..I dunno, but her arguments for acquittal were asinine.
I was thinking the same thingI thought when you had a hung jury it was up to the prosecutor to decide whether or not to have another trial.
If this jury is hung the asswhole who brought the charges should drop them.
MMMMMMM is that good or bad. Did they think that manslaughter wasn't a harsh enough charge so they are coming back to get him for Homicide? I would think the homicide should have been dismissed and the manslaughter charge would be the one they came back for if at all.Manslaughter charged dismissed. Jury coming back Monday to continue deliberations on homicide charge.