Keith...
I don't get it, and it should embarrass us as a nation that we bow down to this dysfunctional family of druggies, drunkards and philanderers. Is it just cult of personality? Or am I missing something?
...Olbermann in one of his daily tirades, I guess a couple days ago, revealed the essence of Kennedy worship. He was berating Hillary and her ruthless ambition and how hurtful it was along with ripping her for her allusion to RFK's assassination. He boiled it all down to the one thing that most human beings share; A deep desire to believe in something which Obama represents. Never mind no one knows what that is; it's SOMETHING.
People still want to believe in Camelot, they want to believe in Jack, they want to believe in the promise, the dream that was to be Bobby. They wanted to believe in the Clinton's.
It's that simple as for WHY they are worshiped; need to believe.
The embarrassing part is the belief is often very poorly placed. Look at Che. Most kids think of him as this freedom fighter during the Cuban revolution, cool, jungle guy who helped beat down 'the man'. Few know he's not even Cuban. Fewer still know that, in terms of what he actually was, that he is one of history's darker figures; a political assassin.
Few Jack and Bobby worshippers know that the two of them sat in the oval office and plotted, on a regular basis, how to assassinate Fidel Castro who is a whole lot closer to the image they have of Che than Che ever was. The President of the United States of American and his Attorney General, his brother, schemed the murder of a political foe on a very personal level. It's not like they gave an order; get it done. They discussed the details. Hell, the left doesn't even wanna talk about Jack being one of the greatest tax cutters of our history, a, perhaps, darker evil.
Lenin, Stalin, there is a lot of misplaced hero worship on the left and among the young; They, by and large, do not believe in a God because that is simply too implausible, yet, there still is this need, this desire to believe and they place it in people far more implausible than God.
Now, why? I have always thought that kids and academics tend to worship and be intrigued by people who held out the promise of never having to do things you don't want to do. Like get a job. And go to it every day. And take on responsibility.
Americans didn't start 'worshipping' people, on fairly large scales, who did not deserve it until the 1960's. Even the communists of post WWI America didn't worship icons; they simply, and sincerely, wanted, somehow, control over the output of the working class for the benefit of the working class.
If you think that through and you're a communist and you need popular support, what better way than the same way advertising works; you develop the brand and you use symbols and icons to sell it.
So, throw in millions of kids and older folks who do NOT want to work and plod along like dad did and were trapped like mom was, never mind every one in the rest of the world would take nearly any risk to get here, yet they still needed something to believe in, a purpose, and have that confluence of communists needing the young and stupid and offering them exactly what they crave; a paradise, a belief in it.
Viola.