Deep State Corruption and Opposition
- Thread starter GURPS
- Start date
Florida Voter Fraud Case Could Overturn U.S. House Race
Last November, Democrat fraudsters bypassed the presidential race and focused instead on the down-ballot races. In Florida, local Democrat candidates received more votes than either Donald Trump or Kamala Harris at the top of the ballot. Something wa...
There is also deep suspicion that this method of fraud has happened across the country, costing Republicans three U.S. Senate seats, about a dozen House seats, and countless local municipal seats and referendums.
A longtime Trump associate, Peter Ticktin, is representing Rochford. The Ticktin Law Group has identified a systematic breakdown of internal election controls that affected the FL-14 race and other races far beyond. They have found duplicate voters called "clones" in the voter rolls. These fraudulent clones are digital people created based on the identities of real people, with minor variations in name spelling, birth dates, and addresses. Multiple clones can be made based on the identity of a single real person. As a result, fraudsters can manufacture unlimited numbers of these cloned voters in the cyber world. They estimate approximately two million cloned voters on the Florida voter rolls.
The Ticktin team has also developed an algorithm that can scan the voter rolls and identify these clone voters. They found that whoever created these clones in the voter rolls was using sophisticated encryption on a level that the National Security Agency might use.
In a recent article, Jerome Corsi explained the 2024 Democrat down-ballot strategy:
The vote-by-mail (VBM) voting process begins when the voter fills out the Florida Statewide Vote-By-Mail Ballot Request Form. A critical piece of this process is the voter's driver's license number or the last four digits of the Social Security number, which are filled out at the top of the form. When these fields are left blank, they are informally referred to as "No-No" ballots because no information is provided in either field. Without this information, it is a felony to send the so-called voter a ballot.
Isn't this a euphemism for CIA Spies
Independent investigative journalist Michael Shellenberg is a former Democrat and a former Time Magazine “Hero of the Environment.” He famously reported on the “Twitter Files” scandal. Now, he’s released a video report that non-ironically accused USAID of treason. It linked a previous tweet where Representative Thomas Massie concluded the exact same thing.
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch...4b9-ece2-4715-bcb7-968ddda17fa0_1247x1222.png
CLIP: Shellenberger levels treason charge on regime-change ‘humanitarian’ agency (7:35).
“The evidence suggests that USAID, along with the CIA, were behind the 2019 impeachment of Trump — an illegal regime change effort at home," Shellenberger explained. "The whistleblower who triggered the impeachment was a CIA analyst who was first brought into the White House by the Obama administration," he said.
In turn, “the CIA analyst relied on reporting by a ‘news’ organization called the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project, which effectively operated as an arm of USAID.” The Deep State-funded OCCRP has “probably been responsible for five or six countries changing over from one government to another government … and getting prime ministers indicted or thrown out."
Cut-outs. CIA → USAID → OCCRP → CIA Whistleblower → Impeachment.
"As such,” Shellenberger concluded, “it appears that CIA, USAID, and OCCRP were all involved in the impeachment of President Trump in ways similar to the regime change operations that all three organizations engage in abroad.”
In other words, treason.
“It is highly illegal and even treasonous,” Shellenberger said, “for CIA, USAID, and its contractors and intermediaries, known as 'cut-outs,' to interfere in U.S. politics this way.”
The momentum is building. Can you feel it? Are arrests coming?
☕️ FREEDOM FRIED ☙ Tuesday, February 18, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠
Answering a tsunami of objections watering down the Social Security Zombie reveal; influential congressman and serious journalist start talking treason; and Europe is on the war mania chopping block.
www.coffeeandcovid.com
LAWFARE: Judge Chutkan appeared skeptical of granting a temporary restraining order (TRO) against Elon Musk and DOGE during today's hearing, criticizing the request as overly broad and based on speculative harm. She rebuked Maryland’s attorney for citing media sources like The Wall Street Journal and The Washington Post instead of concrete evidence. The hearing largely focused on clarifying the plaintiffs’ demands, and Judge Chutkan ordered them to submit a proposed TRO by 5PM tomorrow.
The judge expressed concerns about a supposed lack of transparency in how DOGE operates, saying it “appears to be moving in no sort of predictable and orderly fashion, and plaintiffs are obviously scrambling to find out what’s next.”
Yet, Chutkan pointed out that the states suing the administration are relying primarily on news reports regarding the problems with DOGE rather than actual sources. “The courts can’t act based on media reports. We can’t do that,” she said.
Justice Department attorney Joshua Gardner countered the plaintiffs’ arguments by noting that Musk has not fired any official. Instead, officials who have the authority to terminate employees are carrying out the firings. “There is not a single instance of Elon Musk in his own name or the [U.S. DOGE Service] commanding any of these actions at all,” he said.
Chutkan did indicate that she might be willing to impose a restraining order on DOGE if the plaintiffs provide more compelling evidence. "This is essentially a private citizen directing an organization that's not a federal agency that has access to the entire workings of the federal government to hire, fire, slash contracts, terminate programs, all without any congressional oversight," she argued.
The judge expressed concerns about a supposed lack of transparency in how DOGE operates, saying it “appears to be moving in no sort of predictable and orderly fashion, and plaintiffs are obviously scrambling to find out what’s next.”
Yet, Chutkan pointed out that the states suing the administration are relying primarily on news reports regarding the problems with DOGE rather than actual sources. “The courts can’t act based on media reports. We can’t do that,” she said.
Justice Department attorney Joshua Gardner countered the plaintiffs’ arguments by noting that Musk has not fired any official. Instead, officials who have the authority to terminate employees are carrying out the firings. “There is not a single instance of Elon Musk in his own name or the [U.S. DOGE Service] commanding any of these actions at all,” he said.
Chutkan did indicate that she might be willing to impose a restraining order on DOGE if the plaintiffs provide more compelling evidence. "This is essentially a private citizen directing an organization that's not a federal agency that has access to the entire workings of the federal government to hire, fire, slash contracts, terminate programs, all without any congressional oversight," she argued.
Isn't she supposed to make a final ruling on this today?
Maybe not final but the current ruling is
That's the ruling that just came down?
Filed today
In what the New York Times called an “extraordinary declaration,” the Director of the Office of Administration filed an affidavit swearing that Elon Musk is not even a DOGE employee. It also said Elon is just an advisor to the President— with no authority to make decisions by himself, such as firing anybody. Read the extraordinary declaration for yourself.
I told you: Elon is a decoy.
The news detonated like an M-80 firecracker flushed down a middle-school bathroom toilet. They are downplaying it, but it was devastating news. They’ve been chasing the wrong person the whole time. The billionaire they love to hate —nobody elected Elon Musk!— is just a special consultant to the White House. But if you go back and read and listen to Musk carefully, you’ll find that, while he may have hinted at authority, he never actually claimed it.
For those of you following the online chatter about this case, the Elon Affidavit also torched the plaintiffs’ Appointments Clause argument. They thought they were so clever wielding it against Trump, since Trump used the same argument against Special Prosecutor Jack Smith. But now their argument has vanished, poof! It is a dead letter.
The Appointments Clause (Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution), requires that “Officers of the United States” be appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate if they wield significant authority. Since Elon wasn’t confirmed by the Senate, they thought they had him dead to rights. But ‘advisors’ don’t wield significant authority. Thus, the Appointments Clause doesn’t apply—and the plaintiffs just lost their big constitutional argument.
It was pure political aikido—using the enemy’s own momentum against them. They built an entire legal argument around a fundamental mistake. Trump’s team let the media and the blue states chase Musk around, and then ripped the rug out at the last second. Now their credibility is cracked, their legal strategy is lifeless, their narrative is nullified, and they’re clueless about who to chase next.
It was a strategic humiliation. Like a cartoon coyote, they set the trap for Musk, but the Acme anvil landed on them.
Trump 2.0 is playing a completely different game, and they still don’t realize how far behind they are.
☕️ PHARMAKEIA ☙ Wednesday, February 19, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠
Flu fear porn is back, but we're ready; RFK Jr. declares war on chronic disease and the deep state; Trump’s legal traps keep detonating; Europe is melting down over Trump's Ukraine pivot; more.
www.coffeeandcovid.com
Judge REJECTS Democrats BLOCKING DOGE As Social Security ADMIN QUITS After Elon DROPS BOMBSHELL!
It doesn’t come off as a money laundering operation… It is a money laundering operation.
That is a lot of money to shove a plug up her butt hoping to reduce gases. Maybe the plug was solid gold.
ELECTION INTEGRITY: Biden funneled climate funds to Stacey Abrams shortly before her NGO ran a $55M ad campaign for Kamala Harris’s 2024 race. Climate Power Action’s board includes: Randi Weingarten, Stacey Abrams, Carol Browner, Ernest Moniz, and the former president of the Sierra Club.
