Kudos to everyone taking the time to think about & discuss a difficult topic. For what it is worth, our family has always used the term "direct disobedience" for anything that would lead to a spanking. It sounds really militant, which our family is not, but it defines for all of us when a spanking is a likely result. We try to stay calm and think of "reasonable consequences" for most usual difficult "kid behavior". Kids really see things differently and often don't think before they act, and it is important that the adults stay calm and in control. There are times; however, when some children refuse to be "directed". If I am asking a child to do something and the answer is "no" - a willful response, that is direct disobedience and a spanking is the consequence. This only works if the adult is clear and reasonable with their expectation, and if the child is willful in his/her response. In our family, we do not "swat" the kids, because a spanking is a very serious punishment (we walk to the shelf and get the paddle, then walk back to the kid's bedroom where they get two or three paddles on the behind- this also helps insure that the spanking adult is not too angry!) and this sounds really awful, but I fully expect it to hurt, although mostly it is a very temporary sting and lots of humiliation. If we are out in public, we generally leave. I'm sure that this is not a perfect solution for everyone, but I can say that I have two teenage boys who were spanked on occasion when they were younger (when kids know that you are serious, they don't need spanked often at all!) and many people in our community comment on what nice kids they are. I'm proud of the way that they treat others, (especially me!) with respect and consideration. I have a seven year old that has only been spanked twice in her life. Advice: Keep your expectations for your kids reasonable and teach them to behave & be respectful when they are YOUNG. If they don't listen when they are small, they never will. Good luck.