But why would they do that?
If they include the most popular breeds of dogs, it should include the bully breeds. I guess it is good for the bully breed owner that wants to get homeowners or renters insurance from a company that won't insure them if
they have a bully breed.
But if I were paying $75 to $150 for the testing, I would want something more conclusive.
One of my training locations is in PG county, there sure are a lot of "Bulldog" and "Boxer" mixes running around there, adopted from the local shelters and rescues. The people who developed the tests did not want it to be used against dogs that fall under BSL. Where would lines be drawn... if a dog was 50% pit, should it be put down if in the wrong county? What about 25%?
Pet Search Results: Adoptable dog Pets in Upper Marlboro, MD: Petfinder