DOGE

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
I got an email from Breezeline,asking if my account was active I was supposed to answer it with my password, I emailed them back and said if you get this email and you cash my check every month I am active.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
Sure .. but the AVERAGE Age ?


1740135324917.png




IN THE AMERICA OF 1787, BIG FAMILIES ARE THE NORM AND LIFE EXPECTANCY IS 38

 

PeoplesElbow

Well-Known Member
This is a myth. If people made it past their 3rd birthday, they were home free and likely to die of old age in their beds. That 34-35 thing is taking infant mortality into consideration. Now, they didn't live as long as we do now, but Benjamin Rush was 67 when he died. Thomas Paine was 72. James Madison was 85. Etc etc.
I think it was more like made it to adulthood, a lot of kids died before their 12th birthday.
 

seekeroftruth

Well-Known Member
Quite frankly.... As a retired Bookkeeper... I cannot believe they are not already using categorizing codes. That's just lazy!

No wonder they seem to be spending money willie nillie! It's basic bookkeeping people!

When muskythump said there were no categorizing codes I was shocked!

The IRS requires us to categorize our income and expenses on the 1040.... and then the same government we are funding through those 1040's... can't be bothered....

Nope... I am still shocked....

This is one problem I am delighted muskythump is addressing.

Thanks muskythump!

:coffee:
 

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
Child mortality has been horrific through the ages - and that's even in societies where they DIDN'T sacrifice them to Moloch.

Or - "expose" them - leave them abandoned in the woods to die alone - because they wanted a boy or a child without a defect -

Roman times, child mortality was as high as 2 out of every 3. By the turn of the last century, most places in THE DEVELOPED WORLD still had child mortality rates hovering around 50%. Yep. Half of all children never made it to adulthood. You can even read about famous people - even Presidents - who lost children, and not to war.

In my own family tree - any number of ancestors, where they had a dozen children - and a few never made it past toddler age.

This is why you can read history and find so very many people lived to what we might call, ripe old age. If you thought child mortality had NOTHING to do with "average age" - you might think, wow, that Ben Franklin, he really beat all odds. But lots of people lived to 70, 80 and beyond.
 

Kyle

Beloved Misanthrope
PREMO Member
People are living longer because things that used to kill generations of people 100 years ago are treatable or curable now.

Essentially, the weaker members of the human species are surviving longer.
 

Sneakers

Just sneakin' around....
Essentially, the weaker members of the human species are surviving longer.
And propagating, thereby increasing the numbers of weaker humans with major physical ailments which natural selection would have weeded out without man interfering.
 

PeoplesElbow

Well-Known Member
People are living longer because things that used to kill generations of people 100 years ago are treatable or curable now.

Essentially, the weaker members of the human species are surviving longer.
I'm blind as a bat, I'm sure I would have been eaten by a bear if it wasn't for eyeglasses.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
People are living longer because things that used to kill generations of people 100 years ago are treatable or curable now.


Even as recent as the 1960's ... how many would die from a Stroke or Heart Attack ...

Now you survive to be warehoused in a Nursing Home waiting to die
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member




DOGE just canceled a $324,671 grant for “increasing DEI Programming for Integrated Pest Management” at the USDA

It says a USDA priority is to “advance racial justice.”

Image



1740155447742.png
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member




BREAKING: DOGE just dropped the hammer on an $8.2M USDA contract for "Cow Farts"!
Turns out, the project was for "environmental compliance services" to study what? Cow Farts!
📷
📷
Yep, you heard that right - your tax dollars were about to fund the ultimate in climate science: collecting cow emissions for the "Climate Smart Commodities" initiative.

Guess we'll have to find another way to make our cows eco-friendly.


Image
Image
 
Top