DOJ Corruption and Malfeasance


PREMO Member

Federal Air Marshals Diverted From Sensitive Flights To Follow January 6 Suspects, Officials Say

Air marshals were allegedly pulled off of sensitive missions to follow potential conservatives, suggesting that not only was a law enforcement agency politicized, but that people with no involvement in politics might have been placed at risk as a result. The finding comes amidst the revelation that the FBI let an apparent child rapist go free to pursue January 6 cases.

Five days after the January 6, 2021, protest at the Capitol, Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-MS) and then-Rep. John Katko (R-NY) wrote to the head of the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), David Pekoske, to demand that the agency “disrupt the travel of terrorists who just attacked the seat of the U.S. government,” citing “online chatter” as evidence that they might be al-Qaeda-style bombers.

Soon, TSA appeared to be doing just that — a situation discovered only because of an almost comical situation in which one air marshal was forced to monitor another air marshal because his wife was in D.C. during that time period.


PREMO Member

FBI Tells Newsweek that Trump Supporters are Enemies of the State and Must be Secretly Tracked, Monitored, Investigated

According to an October 4 report in Newsweek, “the federal government believes that the threat of violence and major civil disturbance around the 2024 U.S. presidential election is so great that it has quietly created a new category of extremists that it seeks to track and counter: Donald Trump‘s army of MAGA followers.”

Notice the term “army.” There’s a sinister purpose behind that word. The government, in cooperation with its corporate partners at Newsweek, are trying to paint a picture of an organized military force ready to go to war with Trump as its leader.

As a member of the conservative movement in America, I can tell you that it is the most unorganized, disjointed and fragmented movement in the country. It is not in any way monolithic and as such poses no threat to the government or anyone else.

But this is who our government has targeted for monitoring and tracking.

They’re not worried about the Chinese men of military age pouring over the open border at a rate of 2,000 to 4,000 per month under Biden. They’re not worried about Iranian sleeper cells. NO, they’re worried about American citizens on the Trump team who want to see their candidate in the White House.

Here’s a blurb from the article:

The challenge for the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the primary federal agency charged with law enforcement, is to pursue and prevent what it calls domestic terrorism without direct reference to political parties or affiliations—even though the vast majority of its current “anti-government” investigations are of Trump supporters, according to classified data obtained by Newsweek.
“The FBI is in an almost impossible position,” says a current FBI official, who requested anonymity to discuss highly sensitive internal matters.

The official told Newsweek that the FBI is intent on stopping domestic terrorism and any repeat of the January 6, 2021, “attack on the Capitol.”

But the FBI source told Newsweek that the agency must also preserve the Constitutional right of all Americans to campaign, speak freely and protest the government, as if it holds its nose and begrudgingly goes through the motions of “preserving” any of our rights.

This article is a laughing stock. Pure propaganda. But they’re not even good at creating propaganda because nobody with half of a working brain cell still believes the FBI has any respect for the Constitution. This is the same agency that threatened to investigate parents attending school board meetings and traditional Catholics who attend Latin masses. This is the same FBI that breaks down the doors of unarmed senior citizens like Roger Stone (see photo above from 2019), and arrests elderly women praying in front of abortion clinics.

By focusing on Trump and his MAGA supporters, the FBI official said, the Bureau runs the risk of provoking the very anti-government activists that the terrorism agencies hope to counter.

“Especially at a time when the White House is facing Congressional Republican opposition claiming that the Biden administration has ‘weaponized’ the Bureau against the right wing, it has to tread very carefully,” says the official.

Oh, such a poor FBI, crying crocodile tears because it has to at least pretend like it has constitutional boundaries within which it can conduct its Gestapo operations on American soil, violating households under cover of darkness, forcing its victims into black SUVs and hauling them off in handcuffs and leg irons to the American gulag as they await their show trials.

Their crime? These Americans are “anti-government” in their thinking.

Hmm. Unless there is a new category of crime passed by Congress, the thought crime, and I don’t recall such a law being passed, then it is no crime at all to be “anti-government.”

Any government that prosecutes one of its citizens for being “anti-government” is by nature tyrannical, because people living under a legitimate constituional government would have no reason to be anti-government. By even accusing us of being guilty of being “anti-government,” our government has admitted to its own crimes against humanity.


PREMO Member

Sen. Kennedy Wrecks FBI Director Wray in a Way Only He Can

"Why didn't the FBI just say, 'Hey, the laptop's real?'" Kennedy asked. "Why didn't you tell everybody, 'The laptop's real; we're not vouching for what's on it, but it's real. This isn't a fiction'?"

"Well, I, as you might imagine, the FBI cannot — especially at a time like that — be talking about an ongoing investigation," Wray replied. "Second, I would tell you that at least my understanding is that both the FBI folks involved in the conversations and the Twitter folks involved in the conversations both say that the FBI did not direct Twitter to suppress—"

"But others were in government," Kennedy pointed out.

"Well, I can't — again, I can't speak to others in government," Wray said. "That's part of the point that I was trying to make because the—"

Kennedy then proceeded to lecture Wray that the FBI isn't supposed to be a political entity. "You're not part of the White House and part of Homeland Security. You're not supposed to be political. You see all this controversy going on. Why didn't the FBI say, 'Timeout folks; we're not getting middle this, but the laptop's real?'"

"Again, we have to be very careful about what we can say, especially in the middle of an election season, because that's precisely some of the problems that led to my predecessor's, uhh, negative findings from the inspector—"

Kennedy brilliantly got Wray to admit that he was making a political decision by not correcting the public record about the Hunter Biden laptop. Let's not forget that Joe Biden said it was Russian disinformation. A whopping 51 former intelligence officials decided to sign on to a letter claiming that the laptop was Russian disinformation. Those former intelligence officers most likely all knew it was real, too.

Why did they do it? To give Biden a debate talking point. Biden even used the letter, which was published three days prior, during a debate with Donald Trump to discount it entirely.

“Look, there are 50 former National Intelligence folks who said that what this — he’s accusing me of — is a Russian plan,” Biden said in the debate. “They have said that this has all the characteristics — four — five former heads of the CIA, both parties, say what he’s saying is a bunch of garbage. Nobody believes it except him, his, and his good friend Rudy Giuliani.”


PREMO Member

Daily Wire Sues Biden DOJ For Concealing Records On Its Partisan Riot Squad

The Community Relations Service (CRS) is a federal agency within DOJ that the Trump administration unsuccessfully sought to defund — it simultaneously advocates for left-wing causes while also purporting to offer unbiased “mediation,” including between local governments and left-wing agitators. It describes itself as “America’s Peacemaker” for “communities facing conflict based on actual or perceived race, color, national origin, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, religion, or disability.”

This summer, it attempted to thwart the will of voters in a deep-red county in Virginia by pressuring the local school board to have the federal government mediate whether the school district adopts Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin’s transgender policies. As justification, CRS cited “community tensions,” alluding to the fact that a leftist activist had been arrested for an alleged crime while trying to stop the policy’s adoption.

The move appeared to reward criminal behavior and subvert democracy, through which voters had already chosen a school board who represented their views. A spokeswoman for Youngkin said CRS was acting as “a political arm of the Democratic Party.”

After The Daily Wire in August obtained the email showing a CRS “conciliation specialist,” Hannah Levine, emailing the Roanoke, Virginia school board to offer “support and services,” it filed a FOIA for further emails from Levine. CRS did not even acknowledge the request.

In October, The Daily Wire filed a second FOIA requesting broader information about CRS’s operations. It again did not reply.


PREMO Member

Former GOP Rep. Fortenberry’s Conviction of Lying to Feds Reversed by Appeals Court After Defense Lawyers Argued FBI “Set Up” Congressman

Fortenberry was convicted on three felony counts – one count of falsifying and concealing material facts and two counts of making false statements (each count carries five years) by a federal grand jury in Los Angeles.

Fortenberry’s lawyers argued at trial that the FBI lured the Congressman into giving two interviews – then indicted him after he couldn’t remember all the details about a conversation he had with an FBI informant about the illicit campaign donation.

“Defense lawyers said the FBI “set up” Fortenberry after a national investigation fizzled into foreign money funneled to members of Congress. They said Fortenberry’s flaw was voluntarily meeting with agents and prosecutors to help their probe and having a faulty memory.” – AP reported.

Nebraska Governor Pete Ricketts called a special election to fill Fortenberry’s vacant seat.

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals wiped out Fortenberry’s conviction after his defense lawyers argued the FBI set him up.

The appeals court said the FBI interviews took place in Nebraska at Fortenberry’s home and in DC. Meanwhile, a Los Angeles jury convicted Fortenberry of the alleged crimes that took place in another state.

“Fortenberry’s trial took place in a state where no charged crime was committed, and before a jury drawn from the vicinage of the federal agencies that investigated the defendant,” US District Judge James Donato wrote in the opinion.


PREMO Member

DOJ accused of covering for ‘deep state’ by not holding second SBF trial on illegal political donations: ‘Disgrace’

Federal prosecutors said Friday that they do not plan to proceed with a second trial against Sam Bankman-Fried, citing public interest in a speedy resolution of the case that has seemingly irritated those who were hoping to see the disgraced FTX founder prosecuted to the fullest extent.

In a Friday letter filed in federal court in Manhattan, prosecutors said they do “not plan to proceed with a second trial” as “much of the evidence that would be offered in a second trial was already offered in the first trial and can be considered by the Court at the defendant’s March 2024 sentencing.”

“Given that practical reality, and the strong public interest in a prompt resolution of this matter, the Government intends to proceed to sentencing on the counts for which the defendant was convicted at trial,” the prosecutors added.

The decision by prosecutors not to hold a second trial against Bankman-Fried quickly drew backlash from those who had followed the case.


PREMO Member

What Will the FBI Not Do?

Almost all of the FBI communique is untrue, except the phrase about the bureau’s “engagements which involve numerous companies over multiple sectors and industries.”

Future disclosures will no doubt reveal similar FBI subcontracting with other social media concerns of Silicon Valley to stifle free expression and news deemed problematic to the FBI’s agenda.

The FBI did not merely engage in “correspondence” with Twitter to protect the company and its “customers.” Instead, it effectively hired Twitter to suppress the free expression of some of its users, as well as news stories deemed unhelpful to the Biden campaign and administration—to the degree that the bureau’s requests sometimes even exceeded those of Twitter’s own left-wing censors.

The FBI did not wish to help Twitter “to protect themselves [sic],” given the bureau’s Twitter liaisons were often surprised at the FBI’s bold requests to suppress the expression of those who had not violated Twitter’s own admittedly biased “terms of service” and “community standards.”

The FBI and its helpers on the Left now reboot the same boilerplate about “conspiracy theorists” and “misinformation” smears used against anyone who rejected the FBI-fed Russian collusion hoax and the bureau’s peddling of the “Russian disinformation” lie to suppress accurate pre-election news about the authenticity of Hunter Biden’s laptop.

The FBI is now, tragically, in freefall. The public is at the point, first, of asking what improper or illegal behavior will the bureau not pursue, and what, if anything, must be done to reform or save a once great but now discredited agency.

Consider the last four directors, the public faces of the FBI for the last 22 years. Ex-director Robert Mueller testified before Congress that he simply would not or could not talk about the fraudulent Steele dossier. He claimed that it was not the catalyst for his special counsel investigation of Donald Trump’s alleged ties with the Russians when, of course, it was.

Mueller also testified that he was “not familiar” with Fusion GPS, although Glenn Simpson’s opposition research firm subsidized the dossier through various cutouts that led back to Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign. And the skullduggery in the FBI-subsidized dossier helped force the appointment of Mueller himself.

While under congressional oath, Mueller’s successor James Comey on some 245 occasions claimed that he “could not remember,” “could not recall,” or “did not know” when asked simple questions fundamental to his own involvement with the Russian collusion hoax.

Comey, remember, memorialized a confidential conversation with President Trump on an FBI device and then used a third party to leak it to the New York Times. In his own words, the purpose was to force a special counsel appointment.
The gambit worked, and his friend and predecessor Robert Mueller got the job. Twenty months and $40 million later, Mueller’s investigation tore the country apart but could find no evidence that Trump, as Steele alleged, colluded with the Russians to throw the 2016 election.

Comey also seems to have reassured the president that he was not the target of an ongoing FBI investigation, when in fact, Trump was.

Comey was never indicted for either misleading or lying to a congressional committee or leaking a document variously considered either confidential or classified.

While under oath, his interim successor, Andrew McCabe, on a number of occasions flat-out lied to federal investigators. Or as the office of the inspector general put it:

As detailed in this report, the OIG found that then-Deputy Director Andrew McCabe lacked candor, including under oath, on multiple occasions in connection with describing his role in connection with a disclosure to the WSJ, and that this conduct violated FBI Offense Codes 2.5 and 2.6. The OIG also concluded that McCabe’s disclosure of the existence of an ongoing investigation in the manner described in this report violated the FBI’s and the Department’s media policy and constituted misconduct.

McCabe purportedly believed Trump was working with the Russians as a veritable spy—a false accusation based entirely on the FBI’s paid, incoherent prevaricator Christopher Steele. And so, McCabe discussed with Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein methods to have the president’s conversations wiretapped via a Rosenstein-worn stealthy recording device, presumably without a warrant.

Note the FBI ruined the lives of General Michael Flynn and Carter Page with false allegations of criminal conduct or untruthful testimonies. Under current director Christopher Wray, the FBI has surveilled parents at school boards meetings—on the prompt of the National School Boards Association, whose president wrote Attorney General Merrick Garland alleging that bothersome parents upset over critical race indoctrination groups were supposedly violence-prone and veritable terrorists.

Under Wray, the FBI staged the psychodramatic Mar-a-Lago raid on an ex-president’s home. The FBI likely leaked the post facto myths that the seized documents contained “nuclear codes” or “nuclear secrets.”

Under Wray, the FBI perfected the performance-art, humiliating public arrests of former White House officials or Biden Administration opponents, whether it was the nocturnal rousting of Project Veritas muckraker James O’Keefe in his underwear or the arrest—with leg restraints=—of former White House advisor Peter Navarro at Reagan National Airport for misdemeanor contempt of Congress charge or the detention of Trump election lawyer John Eastman at a restaurant with his family and the confiscation of his phone. Neither O’Keefe nor Eastman has yet been charged with any serious crimes.

The FBI arguably interfered in two presidential elections, and a presidential transition, and possibly determinatively so. In 2016, James Comey announced that his investigation had found that Hillary Clinton had improperly if not illegally used her private email server to conduct official State Department business, some of it confidential and classified, and likely intercepted by foreign governments. All that was a clear violation of federal statutes. Comey next, quite improperly as a combined FBI investigator and a de facto federal prosecutor, deduced that such violations did not merit prosecution.


PREMO Member

DOJ Filing Shows Texas Did Not Stop Border Patrol from Saving Drowning Migrants

Three migrants attempting to enter the United States Friday night had already drowned when Texas’s National Guard turned U.S. Border Patrol Agents away from the Rio Grande, according to a recent Department of Justice filing.

Robert Danley, lead U.S. Customs and Border Protection field agent for the broader Del Rio area, wrote in a statement included with the filing that a Mexican official notified the U.S. Friday night that three migrants — a woman and two children — had drowned roughly an hour earlier while traversing the river.

A Border Patrol official then went to the Shelby Park Boat Ramp entrance, where three Texas guardsmen told him they had been ordered not to let Border Patrol agents into the area.

The filing contradicts earlier mainstream reporting and statements made by Representative Henry Cuellar (D., Texas), as well as a cease-and-desist letter to Texas attorney general Ken Paxton written by U.S. Department of Homeland Security general counsel Jonathan Meyer ordering Texas to stop preventing Border Patrol officials from accessing a section of the state’s border with Mexico.

“Texas’s failure to provide access to the border persists even in instances of imminent danger to life and safety,” Meyer wrote, referencing the drownings. “Texas has demonstrated that even in the most exigent circumstances, it will not allow Border Patrol access to the border to conduct law enforcement and emergency response activities.”


PREMO Member

Alarming Surveillance: Government May Have Tracked Your Transactions at These Common Stores

FinCEN distributed materials to financial institutions that, among other things, outline the "typologies" of various persons of interest and provide financial institutions with suggested search terms and Merchant Category Codes (MCCs) for identifying transactions on behalf of federal law enforcement.' These materials included a document recommending the use of generic terms like "TRUMP" and "MAGA" to "search Zelle payment messages" as well as a "prior FinCEN analysis" of "Lone Actor/Homegrown Violent Extremism Indicators."

They also looked at other things like "‘transportation charges, such as bus tickets, rental cars, or plane tickets, for travel areas with no apparent purpose" and "the purchase of books (including religious texts) and subscriptions to other media containing extremist views."

What qualifies as "extremist views" here? As Jordan said, the government seemed to be looking into potentially protected political and religious expression.

Jordan said the committee obtained documents showing that FinCEN distributed slides, prepared by Key Bank, to other banks to explain how they could use merchant category codes (MCC) to detect customers whose transactions may reflect "potential active shooters, and who may include dangerous International Terrorists/ Domestic Terrorists/ Homegrown Violence Extremists (‘Lone Wolves’)."
Jordan said the slide instructs financial institutions to query for transactions using certain MCC codes like "3484: Small Arms," "5091: Sporting and Recreational Goods and Supplies," and the keywords "Cabela’s," "Dick’s Sporting Goods" and "Bass Pro Shops," among others.

It looks like they may have been trying to do an end run to track people who could potentially be making gun purchases, sweeping up other people who just go to these stores and buy other things up in their net. Jordan said there was no criminal nexus for any of this. The stores didn't respond to a Fox inquiry on the matter.

They want Bishoff to testify and explain what the heck was going on here.

This isn't the first time the government has been caught casting a wide net. They did something similar after January 6, 2021, with the FBI getting information from Bank of America about any credit or debit transactions using a Bank of America in the Washington, D.C. area between January 5 and January 7, 2021 "voluntarily and without any legal process."


PREMO Member

Feds Flagged Terms Like ‘Trump,’ ‘MAGA’ For Banks To Comb Through Customer Data, Jordan Says

“We now know the federal government flagged terms like ‘MAGA’ and ‘TRUMP,’ to financial institutions if Americans completed transactions using those terms,” Jordan said. “What was also flagged? If you bought a religious text, like a BIBLE, or shopped at Bass Pro Shop.”

FinCEN reportedly asked banks to help federal law enforcement identify transactions of persons of interest using specific typologies and Merchant Category Codes after January 6, 2021. FinCEN provided the banks with documentation on various typologies and suggested search terms, according to Jordan.

“These materials included a document recommending the use of generic terms like ‘TRUMP’ and ‘MAGA’ to ‘search Zelle payment messages’ as well as a ‘prior FinCEN analysis’ of ‘Lone Actor/Homegrown Violent Extremism Indicators,’” Jordan wrote.

“According to this analysis, FinCEN warned financial institutions of ‘extremism’ indicators that include ‘transportation charges, such as bus tickets, rental cars, or plane tickets, for travel to areas with no apparent purpose,’ or ‘the purchase of books (including religious texts) and subscriptions to other media containing extremist views.’ In other words, FinCEN urged large financial institutions to comb through the private transactions of their customers for suspicious charges on the basis of protected political and religious expression,” Jordan added.

The letter also said that other transaction keywords identified by the feds included “Cabela’s” and “Dick’s Sporting Goods.”

“Despite these transactions having no apparent criminal nexus — and, in fact, relate to Americans exercising their Second Amendment rights — FinCEN seems to have adopted a characterization of these Americans as potential threat actors. This kind of pervasive financial surveillance, carried out in coordination with and at the request of federal law enforcement, into Americans’ private transactions is alarming and raises serious doubts about FinCEN’s respect for fundamental civil liberties,” Jordan wrote.


PREMO Member

‘This is Your FBI,’ thanks to DEI

Still, as bad and as overrated as the G-men have always been, they’re worse now.

And the feds’ latest descent into abject incompetence and corruption can be summed up in three letters — DEI.

Diversity, Equity and Inclusion.


“The FBI is now a joke among other law enforcement agencies because of its apparent investigative failures, political targeting of certain individuals/groups, and woke adoption… The FBI is considering hiring candidates not accepted by other law enforcement agencies.”

The G-men have Diversity Recruitment Events — “straight white males may not attend.”

In other words, there’s no room for a modern-day Inspector Lew Erskine. But Dylan Mulvaney or Jussie Smollett — come on down!

The FBI denies that they’re having problems recruiting qualified people. But then, the G-men lie about almost everything, as you may have noticed. It’s part of their “sources and methods.”

Here’s a story about the collapse of physical-fitness standards, from an FBI informant identified as SIERRA 72:

“SIERRA 72 disqualified another applicant because she was more than 50 pounds overweight using the FBI’s body fat index and could not pass the PFT (Physical Fitness Test). This particular candidate was an African American female who told SIERRA 72 that she ‘hates working out and was never active.’”


“SIERRA 32 spoke with a NAT (New Agent Trainee) who stuttered and appeared to have Tourette Syndrome or other tic disorder that hindered the NAT’s ability to communicate. SIERRA 32 wondered how this NAT would function in a high-threat, hostile environment.”

SIERRA 87 described how the traditional Boston FBI standards have now gone nationwide:

“Failure to adhere to financial responsibilities is no longer a disqualifier. A candidate who was arrested and fought with police officers was not disqualified. People with a documented mental illness are not necessarily disqualified. Lack of candor is no longer a disqualifier.”

Once upon a time, a G-man at least had to be able to read and write. Now, not so much, because… DEI. The Congressional report is full of anecdotes about new agents who are basically illiterate.

Here’s SIERRA 79 on a “minority female FBI Special Agent” who’d come out of the military:

“The agent’s writing skills were so poor the agent was sent to a local college to take remedial English classes. SIERRA 79 said the agent never made a case or wrote an affidavit… the agent never testified because she could not be trusted in court….”

Everyone in the office, of all backgrounds, noticed this DEI FBI agent’s “glaring, below average performance. Their general reaction ranged from embarrassment, head shakes (and) stunned silence to begrudging acknowledgement that they and the FBI were stuck with the agent.”

Next, the type of backgrounds that are now favored for FBI applicants:

“SIERRA 72 reported that he/she disqualified a candidate because the candidate’s only work experience was working two years as a coffee shop barista and having a bachelor’s degree in art history…. FBIHQ ordered SIERRA 72 to continue this applicant to the next stage in the Agent process.”

Another new agent had cuts on his hands that required bandages. He had been punching the walls of the training gym at Quantico. A supervisor asked the G-man-in-training why his behavior was so out of control.

“The NAT replied, ‘Because I am filled with self-hate and rage.’”
[ oh no, this guy will never violate the rights of a suspect in custody ]

Another Quantico recruit was seen weeping openly, and finally disclosed that “he/she was suffering from clinical depression and was under the care of a medical professional… SIERRA 48 was astounded that the NAT would be allowed to engage in new agent training, especially with access to firearms.”

What could possibly go wrong?


PREMO Member

Mayorkas Says He Does Not Regret Terminating Trump’s ‘Remain In Mexico’ Policy After Millions of Military-Age Males Invade US (VIDEO)

More deflection, more excuses.

The Biden regime has had three years to lock down the border and they simply refused to do so.

DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas was on NBC’s “Meet The Press” on Sunday morning to talk about the border crisis.

“You have now been in your position for three years, and let’s talk about what’s happened during those three years. More migrants have crossed the border illegally last year than ever before,” Kristin Welker said to Secretary Mayorkas.

“The data you cite is a powerful example of why we need legislation to fix what everyone agrees is a broken immigration system.” Secretary Mayorkas responded.

“Do you bear responsibility for what is happening at the border?” Kristin Welker asked.

“We don’t bear responsibility for a broken system,” Mayorkas continued.


PREMO Member

DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas Impeached by US House in 214-213 Vote!

UPDATE: Alejandro Mayorkas has officially been impeached in the House of Representatives by a vote of 214 to 213! Mayorkas is the first cabinet secretary to be impeached in nearly 150 years and the first sitting cabinet secretary in history to be impeached!

New York Times reports,

The United States House of Representatives voted narrowly on Tuesday to impeach Alejandro N. Mayorkas, the homeland security secretary, in a precedent-shattering vote that charged him with willfully refusing to enforce border laws and breaching the public trust.
In a 214 to 213 vote, Republicans barreled past the solid opposition of Democrats and reservations in their own ranks to make Mr. Mayorkas the first sitting cabinet secretary in U.S. history to be impeached.

House Republicans are expected to vote on a historic resolution to finally impeach Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas tonight.

This comes after three RINO lawmakers bailed Mayorkas out last week.

The Gateway Pundit reported last week that Rep. Tom McClintock (R-CA), Rep. Ken Buck (R-CO), and Rep. Mike Gallagher (R-WI) joined the Democrats, leading to a tie vote in Tuesday’s attempt to impeach Mayorkas.

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) said on X that the three RINOs “received TENS OF THOUSANDS of voicemails from furious Americans within the first 24 hours” after they sided with the Democrats.



PREMO Member

DHS Secretary Mayorkas PERSONALLY Declined Presidential Candidate Robert F. Kennedy’s Request for Secret Service Protection

Since his first request, Robert Kennedy, Jr. has been denied Secret Service protection by the Biden administration at least three times.

Even after an intruder broke into his home, Robert Kennedy, Jr. was denied Secret Service protection.

Even after an armed man with a US Marshal’s badge and phony federal ID was arrested at one of his rallies, the Biden Administration denied Robert with Secret Service protection.

On Monday Judicial Watch released evidence through a FOIA request that DHS Secretary Mayorkas personally declined Robert Kennedy, Jr. with Secret Service protection.

Apparently, when Alejandro Mayorkas is not busy flooding the US with millions of illegal aliens, he’s busy making sure Robert Kennedy is unprotected on the campaign trail.

Judicial Watch released their report on Monday before the House vote to impeach Mayorkas.


PREMO Member

ICYMI: Chris Wray’s FBI Forced a Young Mother to Stand Outside Barefoot with Her 4-Yr-Old Boy in His Pajamas in 12° Weather While They Ransacked Her Home – She Lost Her Baby the Next Day

On January 6, 2021, Chris went inside the Capitol but did not cause any harm or damage – in fact, he cleaned trash off the floor, helped to stop theft of government property, asked people to leave the building, and went up to Capitol Police Officers to ask how he could help. Chris was also set up by an FBI operative that day. Chris committed no violence and did nothing wrong.

One month later, in the early morning of February 11, 2021 Chris, his four-year-old child, and his wife Annette, who was pregnant at the time were awakened to sirens, cell phone rings, and bursts of colorful lights reflecting through our windows.

Annette later went public about the raid, “The FBI instructed Chris to come outside immediately. Our 4-year-old was awakened from the chaos, and I picked him up and ran downstairs to open the front door. Our house, street and neighboring streets were completely surrounded by armed FBI and law enforcement. It was a scene that we see so many times in the movies, but now it was here at my house! There were three large armored tactical vehicles parked on my front, side and back yard, and police vehicles that extended throughout the entire community. I open the door, and for a second, I didn’t realize that there were about twenty FBI SWAT Team members with semi-automatic rifles pointed at my son and I. We were covered by the bright red lasers pointed at our faces, chests, and various points on our bodies.”

Chris Wray’s FBI militiamen forced Annette outside with her four-year-old boy in his pajamas. They were forced to stand there on the cold cement.

It was 12° in Olathe, Kansas that morning. And the heartless morons in the FBI forced a young pregnant woman her little child to freeze outside in the cold morning air.


Over the weekend, The Gateway Pundit posted exclusive video of Annette holding her crying son as armed FBI agents raided their home! The boy was terrified and crying after FBI goons lit up his little face with red lasers and woke him up with armored vehicles surrounding their home.

We are losing America to these heartless tyrants.

The little boy is crying for his daddy. This was taken the morning of the raid.


PREMO Member

🔥 The diligent team of crack law enforcement experts at the FBI created a massive ratio yesterday with a helpful public service advisory on shoplifting (a ‘ratio’ occurs when a tweet gets more comments than likes). The first problem was obvious, the FBI must have used Google Gemini to create an image of “shoplifters.” But an even bigger problem quickly emerged once I started looking at what the FBI was pushing.


What the FBI was really up to was shoring up Biden’s pathetic efforts to blame inflation on everybody but himself, by suggesting that higher food prices are somehow caused by sneaky white women stealing purses at Macy’s. But commenters to the tweet properly roasted the floundering federal agency, and helpfully offered FBI agents lots of photos of actual shoplifting, you know, in case they are confused.

The FBI’s link in its tweet opened a self-congratulatory puff piece is titled “What We Investigate: Organized Retail Theft.” Down at the very end of that page, the FBI finally linked to three (3) shoplifting cases it helped investigate:

image 2.png

So I thought, now we’re talking, let’s check them out! Maybe there was a good reason the FBI picked a photo of ladies probably named Katelyn or Lindsay or something, as the faces of “organized retail theft.” But then I immediately ran into my first obstacle: the FBI’s links to pages about the real organized theft cases unhelpfully included no pictures at all. So I expanded my search.

You’d be surprised how many news sites avoided picturing the convicted criminals. But here are the two men sentenced in the New York home improvement holdup case: Jalil MacIntyre, 31, a Jamaican national — immigration status unknown — and Deshun Jackson, 23, of Brooklyn:

image 3.png

It only took a little more digging to find the four heavily-hyphenized, “Ecuadorian Nationals” — in other words, illegals — indicted in Ohio for tuning up a national theft ring (of Apple products): Alexander Diaz-Remache, 38; Gustavo Daniel Vinueza-Bueno, 36; Jonathan Eduardo Remache-Diaz, 32; and Alvaro Oswaldo Loaiza-Alvarez, 27. Assuming those are their real names.

image 4.png

Finally, I discovered — much to my surprise — that the “Nashua Man” who pleaded guilty to transporting $2 million in stolen Apple products to Hong Kong actually had a name. The “Nashua Man’s” name is Guangwei “William” Wu, 30. Despite sinking more time into the search than I should have, I could not find Wu’s picture anywhere, so you’ll just have to imagine what he looks like. (I did find out that Wu pleaded to a lesser offense, stroked a check for the $2 million as restitution, and got only a year of supervised release. So he probably also had a good legal and PR team sending out mugshot takedown notices.)

So there you have it. Not only did the FBI’s own cited cases include no white criminals, there weren’t even any women! And as far as I can tell, only Deshun Jackson — one of seven — is an American. The FBI had real pictures of two black guys, four rough-looking hispanic males, and an Asian gentleman. So, why pick two manicured, coiffed, and well-dressed white women?

There is only one logical conclusion: the racist FBI hates all you white ladies and is trying to pin the blame for all these heists and capers on you.



Well-Known Member
Maybe the FBI needs to use photos of govt officials who won't arrest for theft under a certain amount. They are a bigger problem.


PREMO Member
🔥 It wasn’t all bad news from the Supreme Court this week. The New York Times ran a non-paywalled story yesterday with the goofy headline, “Supreme Court Rules for Muslim Man in Challenge to No-Fly List.

image 6.png

His being Muslim had nothing at all to do with the legal case; why the Times stuffed his religion in its headline is anybody’s guess. It was a good result, but honestly all the facts in this case were weird. Very weird. Yonas Fikre is a Sudanese-American citizen and apparently a frequent international business traveler. He was put on the government’s no-fly list, and nobody knows why. It’s a secret. Still.

Oh. And Yonas lives in Portland. Of course.

It all started in 2009 when, like happens to all of us from time to time, Yonas got an invitation to lunch at the Somali U.S. embassy. Yonas apparently accepted the invitation without giving it much thought. He claims that at the meeting, FBI agents surprised him by revealing he’d been put on the U.S.’s no-fly list. They said if he wanted off of it, he’d have to become an undercover informant infiltrating a Portland mosque.

Then — I am not making any of this up (the Times reported it all as straight news) — a few weeks later, while next visiting the UAE, “on business,” Yonas was arrested, detained, interrogated and tortured. It’s not clear by whom. The UAE’s government? And why? What did they accuse him of doing?

After a remarkably exact 106 days, Yonas “was flown” — by whom? — to Sweden. Yonas lived in Sweden until 2015, when the Swedish government flew him back to Portland by private jet, making Yonas our problem again.

The Times reported these facts like governments fly random people around the world in private planes all the time. Actually, it sounds more like the Swedes badly wanted Yonas out of town. Out of country. Far out of country.

The useless Times didn’t explain or even wonder about any of these salacious facts, even though the answers would have made the story 1,000 times more interesting, rather than just puzzling and darkly sinister.

Anyway, after Yonas sued the FBI for violating his rights to Constitutional due process, the government caved and took him back off the no-fly list, and then tried to dismiss his lawsuit as moot. He could fly wherever he wants, so. The case somehow stretch up to the Supreme Court, and Monday, in a 9-0 decision, the judges agreed that the government’s ploy to moot the case by relenting right after Yonas filed suit didn’t work.

From just what little we do know, this guy seems incredibly sketchy. I’m not surprised the FBI was keeping tabs on him; they probably have troubling answers to a lot of those unanswered questions. Who knows? We assume Yonas is innocent until proven guilty, if someone would charge him with something. Otherwise he just has a lot of weird stuff happen to him all over the world.

But still. The Supreme Court’s decision is great news for regular folks like us. If a suspicious character and potential terrorist like Yonas can challenge his opaque, top-secret, no-fly list designation, then all the poor J6ers might have a chance of getting off it too. Or at least some due process.