Elon Musk

Bare-ya-cuda

Well-Known Member
Just like Trump the guy was born rich and doesn't care about you. He just cares about making money.

The government is paying for Starlink. He is not doing out of the kindness of his heart

More than 75% of traffic on Twitter is bots.

He is not protecting free speech he is imposing his beleifs, politics and ideas on the world through twitter. Which is why he bought. Just like Murdoch does with FOX and Trump tries to do with Truth Social but no one uses it.


You are sounding like a little bitch, I mean you always sound like one but today you are over doing it.
 

glhs837

Power with Control
Just like Trump the guy was born rich and doesn't care about you. He just cares about making money.

The government is paying for Starlink. He is not doing out of the kindness of his heart

More than 75% of traffic on Twitter is bots.

He is not protecting free speech he is imposing his beleifs, politics and ideas on the world through twitter. Which is why he bought. Just like Murdoch does with FOX and Trump tries to do with Truth Social but no one uses it.



See, you should stick with what you know, not whatever crap you get fed. And really, your debate points should not revolves about what you think I think, nor should you attribute things I didn't say to me.

1. Don't care how much or little money he started with. Never said he did. No reason he should. And if he makes things that works towards things I approve of, like the above, don't care how rich that makes him. I would rather someone get rich doing good things than overpricing prescription drugs or inventing new ways to package mortgage debt, or trade on insider knowledge from a position in congress. Or selling political influence

2. Never said he did it out of the kindness of his heart. And they are paying for the Starlink/Starshield they, and getting damned good value for money.

3. Don't really care, as long as I can get the unfiltered information from sources I trust, and then vet for myself cross checking multiple sources. I would rather have unfiltered news and not miss important information like a laptop, or the other examples above. Take COVID. The sheer amount of things that were labelled as "mis/disinformation" that have since turned out to true meant to control what we think is staggering. Below are the things were were told, and saying otherwise would get your ass deplatformed.
1. COVID cannot have come from a lab!!!! RACIST!!!!!
2. Take the shot, you wont get covid!!!
3. Take the shot!!!! You might get covid, but it will be less harmful!!!!
4. Take the shot, you wont transmit it!!!
5. Take the shot, you young folks wont have any heart problem!!!
6. Wear stupid non-protective masks, it will make you feel better!!!
7. Close the schools, and make the kids wear masks!!!!!

4. I see all points of view on there. Iranains, Palestiniens, Russians, they are all there, as are liberals and conservatives.

See, here's the thing you folks cant seem to understand. Espousing your beliefs isn't imposing them. There's an old saying. Your freedom to wave your hands around ends at the tip of my nose. My freedom to say what I want doesn't end at your ears. You are free to walk the eff away if you dont like what I say. What you CANNOT do is try and stop me from saying it. If I want to say that trans women in 99.9 of cases are men pretending to be women, I dont give an eff if you like that. Its not my job to say only what you like. And its NEVER your right to stop me from saying it. Your rights extend to not listening to me or yelling over me. Thats it.

People want to scream in the public square all day that Palestine should be free. Go right ahead, knock yourself out. But the second you block a road and stop me from walking or driving around you, you have taken my rights away.

Oh, and remember I told you to stick with what you know, and dont bother with the progressive storyt? Facts, they matter, and its always worthwhile to check your facts.

 

StmarysCity79

Well-Known Member
See, you should stick with what you know, not whatever crap you get fed. And really, your debate points should not revolves about what you think I think, nor should you attribute things I didn't say to me.

1. Don't care how much or little money he started with. Never said he did. No reason he should. And if he makes things that works towards things I approve of, like the above, don't care how rich that makes him. I would rather someone get rich doing good things than overpricing prescription drugs or inventing new ways to package mortgage debt, or trade on insider knowledge from a position in congress. Or selling political influence

2. Never said he did it out of the kindness of his heart. And they are paying for the Starlink/Starshield they, and getting damned good value for money.

3. Don't really care, as long as I can get the unfiltered information from sources I trust, and then vet for myself cross checking multiple sources. I would rather have unfiltered news and not miss important information like a laptop, or the other examples above. Take COVID. The sheer amount of things that were labelled as "mis/disinformation" that have since turned out to true meant to control what we think is staggering. Below are the things were were told, and saying otherwise would get your ass deplatformed.
1. COVID cannot have come from a lab!!!! RACIST!!!!!
2. Take the shot, you wont get covid!!!
3. Take the shot!!!! You might get covid, but it will be less harmful!!!!
4. Take the shot, you wont transmit it!!!
5. Take the shot, you young folks wont have any heart problem!!!
6. Wear stupid non-protective masks, it will make you feel better!!!
7. Close the schools, and make the kids wear masks!!!!!

4. I see all points of view on there. Iranains, Palestiniens, Russians, they are all there, as are liberals and conservatives.

See, here's the thing you folks cant seem to understand. Espousing your beliefs isn't imposing them. There's an old saying. Your freedom to wave your hands around ends at the tip of my nose. My freedom to say what I want doesn't end at your ears. You are free to walk the eff away if you dont like what I say. What you CANNOT do is try and stop me from saying it. If I want to say that trans women in 99.9 of cases are men pretending to be women, I dont give an eff if you like that. Its not my job to say only what you like. And its NEVER your right to stop me from saying it. Your rights extend to not listening to me or yelling over me. Thats it.

People want to scream in the public square all day that Palestine should be free. Go right ahead, knock yourself out. But the second you block a road and stop me from walking or driving around you, you have taken my rights away.

Oh, and remember I told you to stick with what you know, and dont bother with the progressive storyt? Facts, they matter, and its always worthwhile to check your facts.



You say don't bother with the progressive story and then post a link to a statement ftrom Geico? And expect to be taken seriously.

Just look at how the key words that have been filtered out and the the rise of antisemitism , transgender hatred, racism and xenophobia on Twitter since Elon took over.

One of his kids is trans and now he censors any debate on Twitter he doesn't agree with.

He is imposing his views on the public through twitter and he paid for that privilege. Thats the only reason he wanted to own it. Not to protect free speech which he blocks.

He has repeatedly closed or cancelled pro Harris online events or accounts while letting Trump lie about everything from crowd size to Fema nonsense. Open your eyes.


 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
This is a PARTY choice, not a general population decision. It should be up to the party to choose their nominee.

That effectively disenfranchises the millions of us who don't belong to a Party. Why do I have to be a Democrat or Republican to have a say in our government? I'm still an American.
 

glhs837

Power with Control
You say don't bother with the progressive story and then post a link to a statement ftrom Geico? And expect to be taken seriously.

Just look at how the key words that have been filtered out and the the rise of antisemitism , transgender hatred, racism and xenophobia on Twitter since Elon took over.

One of his kids is trans and now he censors any debate on Twitter he doesn't agree with.

He is imposing his views on the public through twitter and he paid for that privilege. Thats the only reason he wanted to own it. Not to protect free speech which he blocks.

He has repeatedly closed or cancelled pro Harris online events or accounts while letting Trump lie about everything from crowd size to Fema nonsense. Open your eyes.




Sorry, I misspoke which company it was, but in any case, I was correct that the story you would talk about is already a non-story since Geico walked it back.

As for the NPR story, this is similar akin to the liberal notion that not increasing the rate of spending for a govt program is the same as a cut to the program. Twitter users were so used to having liberal views be boosted and conservative ones reduced that when things are even, it looks like its the other way. This clip shows the problem.

“The concern is that as he pushes his own political agenda, X could suppress viewpoints that oppose Musk’s own, either intentionally or by nature of the platform becoming more partisan. That could turn off users who feel marginalized on the platform, and disillusion some who may have earlier bought into his free speech mantra.”

Could, might, I see no proof other than people are used to having things their own way don't like sharing the space with people who disagree with them. Too bad. My eyes are open. I don't see the regular media going after Harris's lies that hard. If Trump is lying, its not the platforms job to stop him. Thats supposed to be the medias job. But like Covid, they are too far in the pocket of the liberal class to do it properly. They have allowed the fine people hoax to become accepted knowledge even though its false.
 

Gilligan

#*! boat!
PREMO Member
You say don't bother with the progressive story and then post a link to a statement ftrom Geico? And expect to be taken seriously.

Just look at how the key words that have been filtered out and the the rise of antisemitism , transgender hatred, racism and xenophobia on Twitter since Elon took over.

One of his kids is trans and now he censors any debate on Twitter he doesn't agree with.

He is imposing his views on the public through twitter and he paid for that privilege. Thats the only reason he wanted to own it. Not to protect free speech which he blocks.

He has repeatedly closed or cancelled pro Harris online events or accounts while letting Trump lie about everything from crowd size to Fema nonsense. Open your eyes.


:killingme
:killingme:killingme
 

Bare-ya-cuda

Well-Known Member
You say don't bother with the progressive story and then post a link to a statement ftrom Geico? And expect to be taken seriously.

Just look at how the key words that have been filtered out and the the rise of antisemitism , transgender hatred, racism and xenophobia on Twitter since Elon took over.

One of his kids is trans and now he censors any debate on Twitter he doesn't agree with.

He is imposing his views on the public through twitter and he paid for that privilege. Thats the only reason he wanted to own it. Not to protect free speech which he blocks.

He has repeatedly closed or cancelled pro Harris online events or accounts while letting Trump lie about everything from crowd size to Fema nonsense. Open your eyes.


It’s ironic how the very views Elon is sharing in his site are the exact views that got censored before Elon bought it don’t you think? I don’t have an x account but I highly doubt t he is censoring the left. What is more than likely being censored is the hateful filth speech coming from leftist like you. So spin away and when you are done get back in that government nipple that keeps your internet on.
 

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
That effectively disenfranchises the millions of us who don't belong to a Party. Why do I have to be a Democrat or Republican to have a say in our government? I'm still an American.
You mean, you think if you’re a registered Democrat - you can vote in the Republican primary? Because that’s happened and for exactly the reason you think - Democrats are encouraged to vote for WEAK Republicans so they can lose in November.

If we didn’t have parties - I could see your point. But if say, Ross Perot creates United We Stand, you shouldn’t allow everyone ELSE to select a nincompoop as their banner wearer. The PARTY chooses it, and registered members pick. Same as union leaders - you wouldn’t allow non union members to vote.

And I know you agree with the idea that - you shouldn’t be able to contribute to a candidate that you can’t VOTE for - say, a candidate running for Senate in Pennsylvania. That person will never represent you. You shouldn’t have the “right “ to select another state’s nominee any more than another party.
 

Bare-ya-cuda

Well-Known Member
You mean, you think if you’re a registered Democrat - you can vote in the Republican primary? Because that’s happened and for exactly the reason you think - Democrats are encouraged to vote for WEAK Republicans so they can lose in November.

If we didn’t have parties - I could see your point. But if say, Ross Perot creates United We Stand, you shouldn’t allow everyone ELSE to select a nincompoop as their banner wearer. The PARTY chooses it, and registered members pick. Same as union leaders - you wouldn’t allow non union members to vote.

And I know you agree with the idea that - you shouldn’t be able to contribute to a candidate that you can’t VOTE for - say, a candidate running for Senate in Pennsylvania. That person will never represent you. You shouldn’t have the “right “ to select another state’s nominee any more than another party.
Not only do they vote for weak republican candidates but the DNC also funds independent candidates in state and local elections to suck votes away from republican opponents.
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
You mean, you think if you’re a registered Democrat - you can vote in the Republican primary? Because that’s happened and for exactly the reason you think - Democrats are encouraged to vote for WEAK Republicans so they can lose in November.

If we didn’t have parties - I could see your point. But if say, Ross Perot creates United We Stand, you shouldn’t allow everyone ELSE to select a nincompoop as their banner wearer. The PARTY chooses it, and registered members pick. Same as union leaders - you wouldn’t allow non union members to vote.

And I know you agree with the idea that - you shouldn’t be able to contribute to a candidate that you can’t VOTE for - say, a candidate running for Senate in Pennsylvania. That person will never represent you. You shouldn’t have the “right “ to select another state’s nominee any more than another party.

Okay, I misunderstood. I'm not sure what I was thinking.....

But I'm not a big fan of party politics so if they went away entirely I'd be okay with that. Although there's a referendum in my county whether school board members have to declare a party on the ballot and I will vote YES on that so I don't accidentally vote for any Democrats. It's not that I love the Republicans so much, I just loathe Democrats and voting for them is like voting for Satanist pedophile sex trafficking Hitlers.

:jet:
 
  • Like
Reactions: BOP

glhs837

Power with Control
It’s ironic how the very views Elon is sharing in his site are the exact views that got censored before Elon bought it don’t you think? I don’t have an x account but I highly doubt t he is censoring the left. What is more than likely being censored is the hateful filth speech coming from leftist like you. So spin away and when you are done get back in that government nipple that keeps your internet on.

I do have a free account. Mainly got it so I can follow SpaceX. The days following Oct 7th were wild. And if you want to see the anti-semetic content, it was Palestinians and their sympathizers.

And that's one of the biggest things in favor of Musks stewardship. Do you think we would have had as good an insight into the savagery and butchery that took place that day were Twitter still in the hands of the previous owners. The key isn't to not allow propaganda. The idea is to show the lie of the propaganda with the truth. Because once you start stopping propaganda, the ones who decide what is propaganda are the new kings.
 

Chopticon64

Well-Known Member
To be fair, if it were actually happening it would almost certainly be a defense contractor providing the service. Halliburton Hurricanes (tm)
Anyone gonna tell her? Any takers?

1728520089889.gif
 

BOP

Well-Known Member
Just like Trump the guy was born rich and doesn't care about you. He just cares about making money.

The government is paying for Starlink. He is not doing out of the kindness of his heart

More than 75% of traffic on Twitter is bots.

He is not protecting free speech he is imposing his beleifs, politics and ideas on the world through twitter. Which is why he bought. Just like Murdoch does with FOX and Trump tries to do with Truth Social but no one uses it.


How are your cats doing these days? You're not forgetting to feed them, what with all that day drinking you seem to be doing, are you?

crazy cat lady.jpg
 

BOP

Well-Known Member
See, here's the thing you folks cant seem to understand. Espousing your beliefs isn't imposing them.
Well, see, that's where you're wrong; sort of.

For leftists, they believe that they have an obligation to not only espouse their beliefs, but to impose them on others if those others won't get with the program.

Basically, because they're that way, they think everyone is that way.

It's not true, but that's what they believe.
 

BOP

Well-Known Member
As for the NPR story, this is similar akin to the liberal notion that not increasing the rate of spending for a govt program is the same as a cut to the program.

The reality is that the left has long, perhaps always been afflicted with that time of mentality. They say, when they didn't get as much of an increase in taxes, that "taxes were cut." Even leftist voters should be able to figure that out, but Exhibit A, HoChiMinhCity79, is more than ample proof that they don't have the necessary band width do think in those terms.
 

BOP

Well-Known Member
Okay, I misunderstood. I'm not sure what I was thinking.....

But I'm not a big fan of party politics so if they went away entirely I'd be okay with that. Although there's a referendum in my county whether school board members have to declare a party on the ballot and I will vote YES on that so I don't accidentally vote for any Democrats. It's not that I love the Republicans so much, I just loathe Democrats and voting for them is like voting for Satanist pedophile sex trafficking Hitlers.

:jet:
:yeahthat:

I'd love to see much of the power taken away from the Demonrat/Republican't uniparty and have it vested in a viable 3rd Party. Sadly, the closest thing to a viable 3rd party are the kooks that make up the Libertarian party, which I was a member of for 40 years. Right up until even I couldn't take or justify the kookiness any longer.
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
I'd love to see much of the power taken away from the Demonrat/Republican't uniparty and have it vested in a viable 3rd Party. Sadly, the closest thing to a viable 3rd party are the kooks that make up the Libertarian party, which I was a member of for 40 years. Right up until even I couldn't take or justify the kookiness any longer.

I was really hoping the Libertarians would take off but all they seem to care about is smoking dope.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BOP

RoseRed

American Beauty
PREMO Member
How are your cats doing these days? You're not forgetting to feed them, what with all that day drinking you seem to be doing, are you?

View attachment 179936
Hey now! I have a geriatric 16 year old cat that think has some dementia going on! But I also have a daughter and an 15 month old granddaughter. 😍
 
  • Like
Reactions: BOP

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
Just like Trump the guy was born rich and doesn't care about you. He just cares about making money.

So What .... Who the hell are you trying to convince that Gates, Buffet, Bezos or ANY OTHER Multi Millionaire / Billionaire gave a damn about anything or anyone beyond making money. Any right congress critter gives a damn, but acquiring more MONEY AND POWER


The government is paying for Starlink. He is not doing out of the kindness of his heart

1. So What
2. Why shouldn't the service be paid for

More than 75% of traffic on Twitter is bots.

Liar Prove it ....

He is not protecting free speech he is imposing his beliefs, politics and ideas on the world through twitter.

Liar ... Elon is Protecting Speech you and the rest of the authoritarians on the left DISAGREE WITH, information that goes AGAINST leftist ideology, leftist group think ... Speech YOU DO NOT LIKE, is misinformation, or lies

Instead ANYONE is free to expose leftist authoritarian lies on Twitter exposing the Trans Narrative, lies about illegal migriants, the crsis on the border, Kamala Harris' lies, her flip flopping, her vapid answer to questions, what a hollow empty suit she is ... like Obama being an empty chair

Which is why he bought. Just like Murdoch does with FOX and

No they support a narrative YOU DO NOT LIKE.


Trump tries to do with Truth Social but no one uses it.

No One :sshrug:

You are so FULL OF SHITE as usual


1728529368396.png



22 Truth Social Statistics 2024 – Market Size & Users


By Rohit Shewale / February 25, 2024


Truth Social was launched in 2022 after Donald Trump was banned on Twitter. The platform gained 1 million users within the first two weeks of its launch.

Currently, the platform has surpassed 2 million active users and is predicted to attract 81 million users by 2026.

This post will provide you with the latest Truth Social statistics. You will also get detailed insights into figures related to the apps’ user base, downloads, demographics, traffic, and more.
So what’s the wait for? Let’s get into it.

Truth Social Statistics 2024 (Top Highlights)

  • Truth Social has more than 2 million active users as of 2024.
  • The market size of Truth Social is estimated to be $1.42 billion as of 2024
  • Truth Social has had over 4.36 million app downloads to date.
  • The app recorded 4.4 million visits in December 2023.
  • 76.34% of the Truth Social users are from the United States.
  • 3% of the social media users use Truth Social.
  • 2% of Truth Social users prefer the app for news.

About Truth Social


Launched OnFebruary 21, 2022
HeadquartersSarasota, Florida
FoundersDonald Trump, Wes Moss, and Andy Litinsky
Active usersOver 2 million
Market Cap$1.42 billion

How Many Truth Social Users Are There?

There are 2 million active users on Truth Social as of 2024.
Further, according to the estimates made by Wikipedia, Truth Social has 607,000 monthly users.
Comparatively, Facebook has 3.05 billion, and Twitter has 528.3 million monthly active users. Hence, Truth Social has a long way to go to get into the list of top Social media platforms.


How Many Truth Social Users
 
Top