HORUS
Better than YOU.
pixiegirl said:I've wanted to adopt a kid for a long as I can remember.
REALLY???? I never knew that
pixiegirl said:I've wanted to adopt a kid for a long as I can remember.
Is it hard posting while carrying a torch?HORUS said:Interesting. I never knew that
mainman said:Is it hard posting while carrying a torch?
Ding ding ding! You think it's tough to get a dog out of the shelter, try getting an American kid out of the adoption system. It's like they'd really rather have these kids sitting in some orphan home than have them living with a family that wants them. Sure, if you're Rosie O'Donnell or Tom Cruise and have unlimited money for lawyers and fees, but for normal people this just isn't feasible.Ken King said:I guess like with most things though, it is overly regulated to the point that it isn't benefitting anyone.
appyday said:I just dont understand why it is so expensive...let some place like Social Services do it and get these kids placed make it so they can be adopted and not sitting and waiting to be bought like puppies..JMO
appyday said:FYI my friend went to Russia..and get this..Under 50 degrees in the orphanage..they do NOT use any diapers at all. no baby food..the kids have never had a "tub" bath. Never out on the earth to "run" This child had alot of adjusting to do just getting him for a bath was horrible at first..now he loves bathtime
I'm not following your logic. Part of the outrageous cost of adoption is too many parents after too few adoptees - hence the search overseas. Fewer children being offered up for adoption forces this arrangement.vraiblonde said:That's why it aggravates me when anti-abortion people insist on adoption as an alternative - they obviously have no idea what it's like.
I disagree.. the cost is NOT a supply and demand issue.SamSpade said:I'm not following your logic. Part of the outrageous cost of adoption is too many parents after too few adoptees - hence the search overseas. Fewer children being offered up for adoption forces this arrangement.
I don't imagine that *placing* a child up for adoption is anywhere NEAR the difficulty of actually doing the adopting.
Why would it be 'aggravating'? Adoption as an alternative would improve the situation.
It's my understanding that, like Bob said, the cost is for the legal fees associated with the adoption, not mere supply and demand.SamSpade said:Part of the outrageous cost of adoption is too many parents after too few adoptees - hence the search overseas.
It would if it wasn't like pulling teeth to actually adopt an American baby. My friend tried three times to get an American child - and she wasn't even looking for an infant. Fell through all three times and PS, they never got any of their money back that they spent on these kids.Why would it be 'aggravating'? Adoption as an alternative would improve the situation.
itsbob said:I disagree.. the cost is NOT a supply and demand issue.
Hence my qualifier "PART of the outrageous cost...". Some of it is home-study. A lot is lawyer's fees. Depending on the host nation, some of it is the different fees THEY require. A good deal of overseas adoptions are travel costs - in addition to extensive time away from work, if you don't have the annual leave built up.vraiblonde said:It's my understanding that, like Bob said, the cost is for the legal fees associated with the adoption, not mere supply and demand.
I never quite figure this one out, especially when it's clear that these celebrities absolutely cannot devote their full attention to them - they get raised by high-priced nannies. I can't figure how the laws work this way - I have to guess that agencies prioritize based on dollars.vraiblonde said:Yet they'll let any vapid celebrity with mega-bucks go to the head of the baby line, even if they're drunks and druggies. Even if they're Scientology cult members. Even if they're not married or gay.
Go figure.