Field trip tattoo

citysherry

I Need a Beer
This is fron Urban Dictionary:

“Tramp Stamp” is a derogatory term referring to a tattoo which a women places on her lower back. It is especially popular among women born in the late 70’s, 80‘s, and even early 90’s. Fair or unfair, these tattoos have a socially constructed connotation associated with them. These women are labeled as tramps, whores, or other derogatory sexually promiscuous terms. Although these are often bias generalized claims, there have been sociological studies done by the American Psychological Association, Federal Bureau of Prisons, and other demographic researchers showing strong correlative evidence associating tattoos with high risk behavior, illegal substance abuse and sexual promiscuity. These risk factors are greatest in the age range which these types of tattoos are gaining main stream popularity. Some have also jokingly stated that by 2050, the “tramp stamp” will be renamed the “gramp stamp”.
Those chicks with tramp stamps are the kinds of girls you take home to bang. Don’t get into relationships with them because they are often immature gold digging sluts who sleep with everyone. Oh yeah, make sure you use a rubber because you don’t want to end up with chlamydia trachoma (which 1 in 20 women have between the ages of 14-39 according to the center of disease control… probably much higher if they have a tramp stamp considering the scientific coloration between sluttiness and tramp stamps). Also, if they pop out a baby (which they often do), they may have issues getting epidurals through their tattoos in the lower back.
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
I'm trying to figure out what you want them to do about it, or if you just wanted to inform them.

I think the school should be informed when chaperones aren't chaperoning and are letting the kids do whatever they please, don't you?
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
So when your daughter wants to get a temp tat like mommy's are you going to say you have to wait until you're 30 to get a tramp stamp?

My daughter was over 18 when she got hers - out of my jurisdiction. She had to wait until 16 to get her bellybutton pierced.
 
I am not taking it that seriously. All you see on this forum is people downing other parents for choices they make as parents. Is over silly stuff to like a kid with a TEMP tat or so and so gave their kid ice cream for breakfast. Big freakin deal.

I guess what some people find important is different then what I find important. I deal with my child's father who feels it's okay to let her drive without a seatbelt and ride a 4 wheeler without protective gear. Those to me are important issues. Tattoos and ice cream for breakfast are trival things.

People parent differently it doesn't make them right or wrong. If a child's safety and well being is at risk then I can see someone being concerned.

You're right, to each their own. I just think that with regards to this particular situation, it was inappropriate for this to have taken place at a school function. A temporary tattoo placed where some unknown individual physically had to lift the back of a child's shirt is not acceptable in my opinion. What you, or whoever, allow your daughter to do, have on her body or even eat for breakfast :)lol:) is absolutely up to you.
 

LusbyMom

You're a LOON :)
My daughter was over 18 when she got hers - out of my jurisdiction. She had to wait until 16 to get her bellybutton pierced.

See that is another issue. I wouldn't let my child get their bellybutton pierced and I see kids as young as 12 with theirs done. To me that is a purely sexual thing.

I dont' think sexual when I see my 7 year old with a tat on her back.
 

Cowgirl

Well-Known Member
I think the school should be informed when chaperones aren't chaperoning and are letting the kids do whatever they please, don't you?

I remember going on field trips and buying souvenirs. I'm guessing the chaperone thought the tattoo was a souvenir. Surely Vrai, you of all people know people have different views on parenting. Surely you can understand that a 10 year old should have some understanding of what is appropriate for a child her age. The child is old enough to take responsibility for the tattoo. If her parents are so over protective that they get SO bent out of shape from a temporary tattoo, then they should have been chaperoning her.
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
People parent differently it doesn't make them right or wrong.

Well aren't you just a cute little non-judgmental hippie?

So if a parent allowed their 10 year old to have her boyfriends over and have sex with them, you'd have no problem with that, right? Because it's just different parenting and isn't right or wrong.

:rolleyes:
 
See that is another issue. I wouldn't let my child get their bellybutton pierced and I see kids as young as 12 with theirs done. To me that is a purely sexual thing.

I dont' think sexual when I see my 7 year old with a tat on her back.

You might if you saw her showing little Johnny down the street...especially if those thongs you bought her started creeping out :whistle:






j/p :lmao:
 

LusbyMom

You're a LOON :)
Well aren't you just a cute little non-judgmental hippie?

So if a parent allowed their 10 year old to have her boyfriends over and have sex with them, you'd have no problem with that, right? Because it's just different parenting and isn't right or wrong.

:rolleyes:

Hippie :lmao:

You can not compare a 10 year old having sex to a 10 year old getting a tattoo.
 
Top