ProximaCentauri
Member
Paul also knew the human heart would not only be quick, but that it would be ingenious in the pleas that it would offer as to why we are not wrath-worthy.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1bbdc/1bbdc55636610373f6944ef32ba06f0efc122bb8" alt="LOL :lol: :lol:"
Paul also knew the human heart would not only be quick, but that it would be ingenious in the pleas that it would offer as to why we are not wrath-worthy.
Not too creative eh? Allah is not impressed.
Tell me something... when you walk in the field and see bovine excrement, what do you do? Do you run over to it and yell out "bovine excrement!", or do you just avoid it and ignore it? If this is really a bunch of bovine excrement to you, why do you waste your time with it?
Or...................... you fear bovine excrement.You're afraid bovine excrement is going to take over all our minds.
Paul has done what any wise prosecuting attorney would do, he has been eliminating your excuses before we have opportunity to present them. No one has a self-defense plea that will successfully excuse them from being counted worthy of God’s wrath.
An eternal torment in fire for non-belief only illustrates the sadistic and immoral nature of the imaginary deity you worship. Your 'faith' is in fact fear, dressed-up as virtue.
An eternal torment in fire for non-belief only illustrates the sadistic and immoral nature of the imaginary deity you worship. Your 'faith' is in fact fear, dressed-up as virtue.
Nah...Fear is your issue, not mine. But the bovine excrement that fills your cranium and others, does have a negative impact on society at large.
The notion of the eternal torment of the wicked can only be defended by accepting the Greek view of the immortality and indestructibility of the soul, a concept which is foreign to Scripture. Everlasting torture is intolerable from a moral point of view, because it pictures God acting like a bloodthirsty monster who maintains an everlasting Auschwitz for his enemies, whom he does not even allow to die.
So you refute the Book of Revelations?
In the Old Testament, the word “sheol” is the underground depository of the dead. There are no immaterial, immortal souls in sheol, simply because the soul does not survive the death of the body. QUOTE]
The 'soul' does not exist. Neither does 'sheol'. However, sh*t and shinola do exist, and you don't know the difference between them.
The notion of the eternal torment of the wicked can only be defended by accepting the Greek view of the immortality and indestructibility of the soul, a concept which is foreign to Scripture. Everlasting torture is intolerable from a moral point of view, because it pictures God acting like a bloodthirsty monster who maintains an everlasting Auschwitz for his enemies, whom he does not even allow to die.
Matthew 25:46 “And these will go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous into eternal life.”
In the Old Testament, the word “sheol” is the underground depository of the dead. There are no immaterial, immortal souls in sheol, simply because the soul does not survive the death of the body. QUOTE]
The 'soul' does not exist. Neither does 'sheol'. However, sh*t and shinola do exist, and you don't know the difference between them.
The Bible never sees the flesh and the soul as two different forms of existence. Rather, they are manifestations of the same person, the ancient Hebrews could not conceive of one without the other.
The 'soul' does not exist. Neither does 'sheol'. However, sh*t and shinola do exist, and you don't know the difference between them.
The notion of the eternal torment of the wicked can only be defended by accepting the Greek view of the immortality and indestructibility of the soul, a concept which is foreign to Scripture. Everlasting torture is intolerable from a moral point of view, because it pictures God acting like a bloodthirsty monster who maintains an everlasting Auschwitz for his enemies, whom he does not even allow to die.
The 'soul' does not exist. Neither does 'sheol'. However, sh*t and shinola do exist, and you don't know the difference between them.
So you agree this statement of yours is in error when referencing the Book of Revelations?
An eternal torment in fire for non-belief only illustrates the sadistic and immoral nature of the imaginary deity you worship. Your 'faith' is in fact fear, dressed-up as virtue.
The notion of the eternal torment of the wicked can only be defended by accepting the Greek view of the immortality and indestructibility of the soul, a concept which is foreign to Scripture. Everlasting torture is intolerable from a moral point of view, because it pictures God acting like a bloodthirsty monster who maintains an everlasting Auschwitz for his enemies, whom he does not even allow to die.
So you agree this statement of yours is in error when referencing the Book of Revelations?
The stern punishment awaiting the enemies of righteousness, whose temporary resurrection results only in a return to death and its punishment, their full and final defeat. The wicked will be resurrected mortal in order to receive their punishment which will result in their ultimate annihilation. This not in error at all. Nowhere in the Old Testament is the abode of the dead regarded as a place of punishment or torment.
Umm, no. You said "The notion of the eternal torment of the wicked can only be defended by accepting the Greek view of the immortality and indestructibility of the soul, a concept which is foreign to Scripture. Everlasting torture is intolerable from a moral point of view, because it pictures God acting like a bloodthirsty monster who maintains an everlasting Auschwitz for his enemies, whom he does not even allow to die." Apparently you find the notion of God as illustrated in the Book of Revelations to be "intolerable". Last I checked the Book of Revelations is in the New Testament, which is part of Scripture.