Fox "News" Bimbo Asks Ignorant Question

itsbob

I bowl overhand
OK... where to begin?

1) Thank you for making my point.

2) In your initial post, you said that nhboy used "misogynistic and RACIST" comments. I replied saying that calling the reporter a "Bimbo" is not racist at all. It is gender biased but, not racist! YOU were the one who made the huge jump to racisim.

3) Finally, I am confused. Are you saying that you DO NOT like the leftist use of Racisim for every argument? Because, it WAS you that called nhboy's comments "Racist" in the first place.

You need to go back to bed.. apparently you didn't get enough sleep last night..
 

cwo_ghwebb

No Use for Donk Twits
lol! The real humor here is how cwo_ghwebb believes what he posts is relevant in any way. Just another scared wrinkly old guy.


Absolutely correct in every way except the scared wrinkly part! You forgot the white part too!

Just come to my house, ifn you can swim that far, and judge for yourself just how scared I am of your Mom's basement dweller.

Got no guns, just a Civil War Naval Officer's Sword I can skew you with and barbeque your butt for dinner. What we can't eat we'll throw into the river (about 10 yards away) and we can start harvesting crabs in the near future.

You gotta get your GED and start making some intelligent posts.
 

donbarzini

Well-Known Member
I cannot see the video but...

From the OP's post, I saw NOTHING indicating race until YOU brought it up.

Calling someone a bimbo might be misogynistic BUT... It is DEFINITELY NOT racist!!!

You are what is wrong with the country right now.... YOU precieve a comment as racist ... therefore it IS? Not really!

Why would you intentionally bold AND underline a word that doesn't exist? Or are you inventing a word that means perception BEFORE knowledge? As in: "He preceived the man was black because his first name was Rufus."
 

Gilligan

#*! boat!
PREMO Member
lol! The real humor here is how cwo_ghwebb believes what he posts is relevant in any way. .

I beg to differ. The real humor here is in the truly remarkable degree of irony you displayed in making that post.:howdy:
 

CrashTest

Well-Known Member
Boy, you never fail to show how intolerant you liberals are. Calling a black woman reporter a bimbo. It’s misogynistic and racist.

And besides your ignorant and bigoted headline, what was the ignorant question?

Fox only hires the bimbo darkies. All the smart darkies live in Detroit.
 

PsyOps

Pixelated
OK... where to begin?

1) Thank you for making my point.

2) In your initial post, you said that nhboy used "misogynistic and RACIST" comments. I replied saying that calling the reporter a "Bimbo" is not racist at all. It is gender biased but, not racist! YOU were the one who made the huge jump to racisim.

3) Finally, I am confused. Are you saying that you DO NOT like the leftist use of Racisim for every argument? Because, it WAS you that called nhboy's comments "Racist" in the first place.

I realize you've only posted 440 posts in about 5 years, but you had to have read some of my posts in the past.

I do not believe Nhboy is a racist. I do not believe boy calling Faulkner a bimbo was racist. We have had to tolerate hundreds of charges by the left of racism. From disagreeing with Obama, to using self-defense, to being a member of a grassroots movement (the Tea Party) racism has become the answer to everything the left disagrees with. Their entire line of debate has been cheapened to one very simple term in an attempt to vilify those they disagree with. Not facts or substance – we’re all racists. Being kind… it’s absurd and they don’t even see the bigotry in their own rhetoric.

So, just as they behave absurdly, I am being absurd – sarcastic. Nhboy calling Harris Faulkner a bimbo is bigoted and hateful; the very thing liberals claim to be fighting against. They’re a bunch of hypocrites.
 

Midnightrider

Well-Known Member
I realize you've only posted 440 posts in about 5 years, but you had to have read some of my posts in the past.

I do not believe Nhboy is a racist. I do not believe boy calling Faulkner a bimbo was racist. We have had to tolerate hundreds of charges by the left of racism. From disagreeing with Obama, to using self-defense, to being a member of a grassroots movement (the Tea Party) racism has become the answer to everything the left disagrees with. Their entire line of debate has been cheapened to one very simple term in an attempt to vilify those they disagree with. Not facts or substance – we’re all racists. Being kind… it’s absurd and they don’t even see the bigotry in their own rhetoric.

So, just as they behave absurdly, I am being absurd – sarcastic. Nhboy calling Harris Faulkner a bimbo is bigoted and hateful; the very thing liberals claim to be fighting against. They’re a bunch of hypocrites.

well i have read enough of your posts to know that you work that victim mentality pretty hard. :keeprockingthehypocriticalbigotry:
 

SG_Player1974

New Member
I realize you've only posted 440 posts in about 5 years, but you had to have read some of my posts in the past.

I do not believe Nhboy is a racist. I do not believe boy calling Faulkner a bimbo was racist. We have had to tolerate hundreds of charges by the left of racism. From disagreeing with Obama, to using self-defense, to being a member of a grassroots movement (the Tea Party) racism has become the answer to everything the left disagrees with. Their entire line of debate has been cheapened to one very simple term in an attempt to vilify those they disagree with. Not facts or substance – we’re all racists. Being kind… it’s absurd and they don’t even see the bigotry in their own rhetoric.

So, just as they behave absurdly, I am being absurd – sarcastic. Nhboy calling Harris Faulkner a bimbo is bigoted and hateful; the very thing liberals claim to be fighting against. They’re a bunch of hypocrites.

Gotcha... Understood now! :buddies:

BTW... I you have to LOVE the people who don't have a valid point to make so instead, they choose to become the spelling police!
 

Lurk

Happy Creepy Ass Cracka
OK... where to begin?

1) Thank you for making my point.

2) In your initial post, you said that nhboy used "misogynistic and RACIST" comments. I replied saying that calling the reporter a "Bimbo" is not racist at all. It is gender biased but, not racist! YOU were the one who made the huge jump to racisim.

3) Finally, I am confused. Are you saying that you DO NOT like the leftist use of Racisim for every argument? Because, it WAS you that called nhboy's comments "Racist" in the first place.

Didn't the boy also use the word Ignorant in his description of the sista and her questions?
 

PsyOps

Pixelated
Gotcha... Understood now! :buddies:

BTW... I you have to LOVE the people who don't have a valid point to make so instead, they choose to become the spelling police!

The only time I might call someone out for misspelling is when they call folks idiots or ignorant or needing to learn the English language while laced with misspellings and grammar problems. I make a lot of spelling and grammar mistakes so I can’t play that game. I put most of my posts in Word to try to catch most of that stuff.
 

Radiant1

Soul Probe
Anyone, regardless of qualifications, can write anything about anything. I was pointing out how hypocritical it is to condemn Mooselimbs to write about Mooselimbs and demand their heads for doing so.

Or Mooselimbs condemning Christians for writing negatively about anything Mooselimbs. Or Christians demanding heads to roll about Mooselimbs writing about Jesus......

Just how tolerant are you????

Tolerant enough for a highly educated Muslim man in history and religious studies to be justified in writing a book about Christianity regardless of his personal beliefs. I'd say the same about a highly educated Christian man in in history and religious studies who wrote a book about Islam. The book isn't comparative religion, it's a scholarly piece on the history at the times of Jesus in Palestine. :shrug:
 
Last edited:

bcp

In My Opinion
Agree with him or not, I do have to say that she was pushing too hard and that he did provide her with a valid reason for writing the book.

From what I hear, he wrote on a historical level instead of writing from the position of the authors personal belief.

Im pretty sure that there are some facts or conclusions in the book based on historic documentation interpreted through his personal feelings, but overall I see little reason to discount his book completely.

as a matter of fact, Its very possible that his book could even further the proof of Christ as the savior since it was written by a non believer and the truth still came out.
 

PsyOps

Pixelated
Agree with him or not, I do have to say that she was pushing too hard and that he did provide her with a valid reason for writing the book.

From what I hear, he wrote on a historical level instead of writing from the position of the authors personal belief.

Im pretty sure that there are some facts or conclusions in the book based on historic documentation interpreted through his personal feelings, but overall I see little reason to discount his book completely.

as a matter of fact, Its very possible that his book could even further the proof of Christ as the savior since it was written by a non believer and the truth still came out.

YOU'RE supporting a Muslim? :faint:
 
Top