WOW, so tell me..
Which one did you do? Are you a RANGER?? Or did you go further than all the way and get the Green Beret??
I'm VERY impressed.
Well, if I tell, I may have to k....... lol.
Let's just say more than 10 years in combat arms. I too had some pixie assignments and because of some personal hardships, had to end that career of a few yrs shy of mil retirement. Thought it was a good idea at the time... but you know what they say about hind-sight.
But I will agree with you that basic training in weapons and guns is minimal. Afterall, some never see a gun again except the annual qualifying. And qualifying at 300 meter target doesn't give too much room for accuracy. But I was more referring to many soldiers that move into advancement... and a majority is infantry (or similar) that train in deadly force, and what it is not.
Didn't mean to start a ruckess about it.. but it does disturb me when you have some folks crusading the old-baloney.. guns kill and never forget that! That irks me! Which subconsciously makes non-gun owners suspect that they are bad and only kill. Heck, a properly stabbed rose thorn can kill a person. And this is coming from a childhood and family that despised guns. Until I was 17 and off into the wild green yonder...
And as I referred to pulling guard duty... my soldiers were trained to know their general orders, including what is deadly force. Basics taught them to make the intruder stop and be recognized, and advanced until fully recognized... if they don't, you use head and insticts, but why would you want to blow their head off? Especially if they are not an immediate threat. I believe many civilian physical protection classes teach the same principle. A bullet, even a .22 in the leg will stop most thugs. And afterall, an M16 round is nearly a .22 size for those that believe a .22 isn't enough. Bottom line is... guns don't kill... the operator of that tool could. That's all...