Critical AreaIf I may ...
A variance? For outdoor seating? Why? Doesn't make sense. Need more information from these folks as to what is really going on.
As is every restaurant within 1000 feet of a body of water. Still doesn't' make sense.Critical Area
It all started when they made some form of error on their liquor license renewal, so they say. https://pier450.com/I'd think these details would have been hammered out BEFORE the restaurant opened.
I believe this latest issue stems from the recent clean-up they did to the existing property. They removed all the debris from a dilapidated out-building and are repurposing the EXISTING concrete pad for additional outdoor seating. The county is deeming it 'new'.What's the problem here? Why can't they use their outdoor facilities?
Also, isn't it a little late in the game for this? I'd think these details would have been hammered out BEFORE the restaurant opened.
My entire bar/restaurant property was Critical Area and all within 100' of the waterline.Critical Area
Ahh..that makes some sense. The licenses that include outdoor serving include a diagram with boundary. At least mine did. When we added the tiki bar to the outside deck, it was already covered by the existing license because it was on a deck that was within the permitted boundary.I believe this latest issue stems from the recent clean-up they did to the existing property. They removed all the debris from a dilapidated out-building and are repurposing the EXISTING concrete pad for additional outdoor seating. The county is deeming it 'new'.
If they did not 'check the box' on the renewal for outdoor service is possible, or even a late submittal of the application. However, the county definitely has a hard on for this restaurant for some reason or another. Another restaurant that is dealing with some serious BS is Morris Point. Chris has an existing concrete pad that he puts a canopy over for outdoor dining. LUGM requires him to have a variance hearing every year to put his tent back up.I believe this latest issue stems from the recent clean-up they did to the existing property. They removed all the debris from a dilapidated out-building and are repurposing the EXISTING concrete pad for additional outdoor seating. The county is deeming it 'new'.
LUGM sure are full of themselves these days. Clearly they've forgotten their mission and who they work for.If they did not 'check the box' on the renewal for outdoor service is possible, or even a late submittal of the application. However, the county definitely has a hard on for this restaurant for some reason or another. Another restaurant that is dealing with some serious BS is Morris Point. Chris has an existing concrete pad that he puts a canopy over for outdoor dining. LUGM requires him to have a variance hearing every year to put his tent back up.
I'm sure Frank had all the coverage he needed for selling us cold beer off the dock back in the day. At 2 am.I Another restaurant that is dealing with some serious BS is Morris Point. Chris has an existing concrete pad that he puts a canopy over for outdoor dining. LUGM requires him to have a variance hearing every year to put his tent back up.
LUGM requires him to have a variance hearing every year to put his tent back up.
But the county is allegedly all in on fostering economic growth. The 1st and 7th are both underserved when it comes to dining options so for them to actively overburden, complicate and outright hinder these businesses is the antithesis of fostering growth. Here is a line from a MD House Bill concerning a commission I am on:LUGM sure are full of themselves these days. Clearly they've forgotten their mission and who they work for.
Seems to me like the right hand doesn't know what the left is doing.(8) PROVIDE LEADERSHIP FOR AND COORDINATE ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES IN AND AROUND ST. MARY’S CITY TO PROMOTE
THE REGION FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS; AND
I'm not surprised.Seems to me like the right hand doesn't know what the left is doing.