Speedy70 said:Did you have an amnio done?
kwillia said:I would think the only time you'd want to do an amnio would be to screen for potential genetic problems if you are considered high risk.
cattitude said:No. No need unless there's a suspected problem.
Christy said:It is common to be asked if you want the test early on so you have the option of aborting it if there is suspicion of abnormalities.
Christy said:If it's the same test that I'm thinking of. :shrug:
Christy said:If it's the same test that I'm thinking of. :shrug:
That leads to the next set of rhetorical questions for a woman facing such a test... What does she hope to learn? Will the info provide benefit from knowing about a potential problem up front or is it just a "nice to know and I don't want to wait until birth to find out"?Speedy70 said:That's correct.
Speedy70 said:That's correct.
Speedy70 said:I had the nuchal translucency done last week and got my results yesterday. They expected my numbers to be higher for my age, but they weren't. Something in my blood work is off. However, my numbers still indicate a less than 1% chance of an abnormality, such as Downs. It's been suggested to consider the amnio.
cattitude said:If it's the test I'm thinking of, if they are off at all on your conception date it will skew the test results.
I honestly think the amnio's don't give the detail you're looking for and I can give an example why.Speedy70 said:I had the nuchal translucency done last week and got my results yesterday. They expected my numbers to be higher for my age, but they weren't. Something in my blood work is off. However, my numbers still indicate a less than 1% chance of an abnormality, such as Downs. It's been suggested to consider the amnio.
cattitude said:If it's the test I'm thinking of, if they are off at all on your conception date it will skew the test results.
Speedy70 said:I had the nuchal translucency done last week and got my results yesterday. They expected my numbers to be higher for my age, but they weren't. Something in my blood work is off. However, my numbers still indicate a less than 1% chance of an abnormality, such as Downs. It's been suggested to consider the amnio.
jenbengen said:No. We knew too many abnormal test results that ended up being nothing. A lot of people decline the test unless they know they are at a high risk of something specific.
I have some friends of the family that had an amnio done and found out that their child would have Down's Syndrome. Because of this, they were able to prepare better for the child and have specialists on hand during labor and delivery.kwillia said:That leads to the next set of rhetorical questions for a woman facing such a test... What does she hope to learn? Will the info provide benefit from knowing about a potential problem up front or is it just a "nice to know and I don't want to wait until birth to find out"?
There are some problems that can be prepared for and possible treated if the docs know ahead of time... but if that's not going to be the case, I'm not sure what the benefit of knowing a few months earlier really is... like Christy pointed out, it could very well just lead to added stress in the pregnancy and sometimes it's for naught.