I'm sorry...

Larry Gude

Strung Out
Do you really think so?

otter said:
You're so right, Mr Gude, my bad...

Also, ditch instant replays if they aren't gonna use them. No doubt Alsott was down before scoring the 2 pt'er....


I mean, the end zone cam, his elbow goes down, yeah, but we can't see the ball.

I didn't see indisputable, I don't think.

If it was us, I'd be pizzed if they called him down.
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
otter said:
No doubt Alsott was down before scoring the 2 pt'er....
Dummy here :howdy: Alsott obviously didn't get that 2 pointer. His helmet may have, but the ball didn't cross the line - no friggin' way, especially after seeing that last camera angle.
 

Larry Gude

Strung Out
Haven't had a touch of anything...

cattitude said:
Are you mad or :drunk: :lol:


...but gettin' ready to maybe makes some daquiris's!

And not mad. It was a GREAT, suspense filled game. Hate losing but damn, so many guys kept making plays, both teams. Mark just needed to make ONE more.
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
Larry Gude said:
but we can't see the ball.
You can't see the ball, but you know he's got the ball tucked right above his waist, maybe as high as his chest, just from the way his arms are. Not high enough to have crossed the line.
 

cattitude

My Sweetest Boy
Larry Gude said:
...but gettin' ready to maybe makes some daquiris's!

And not mad. It was a GREAT, suspense filled game. Hate losing but damn, so many guys kept making plays, both teams. Mark just needed to make ONE more.

I was talking to Otter. :lol:

But, here, you can have this.

<img src="http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y111/jrlvr8/cheese.jpg" alt="Image hosted by Photobucket.com">
 

AK-74me

"Typical White Person"
vraiblonde said:
You can't see the ball, but you know he's got the ball tucked right above his waist, maybe as high as his chest, just from the way his arms are. Not high enough to have crossed the line.
Exactly it is like they gave it to him just because they expected him to make it in.
 

Otter

Nothing to see here
vraiblonde said:
You can't see the ball, but you know he's got the ball tucked right above his waist, maybe as high as his chest, just from the way his arms are. Not high enough to have crossed the line.

:notworthy

Can you have a ball in your right hand and have it ahead of where your elbow is on the ground?? I don't think so
 
To lighten the mood...
 

Attachments

  • larry.jpg
    larry.jpg
    44.7 KB · Views: 75

rraley

New Member
Don't know about you sir, but I yelled a very loud obscenity after the 2 point conversation that was heard by everyone on my floor including the priest who manages my hall...yeah couldn't help it.
 

AK-74me

"Typical White Person"
vraiblonde said:
AK, he was decidedly unhappy. :lol:

I'm sure he was although I know deep down inside he takes pleasure in that he can justify putting the loss on Brunell's shoulders.
 

Otter

Nothing to see here
Now don't go confusing Larry's passion for the Skins with the Brunell stuff. He calls em as he sees em.
 
D

dems4me

Guest
I'm still mad about it all... :cussing: We all know Alstot's style of running with the ball.. its an arm underneath and one on top... all snug in his belly beneath the shoulder pad vest thing... he didn't start shimmying the ball up untill WAY after he was down and momentum stopped... I was mad :cussing: And THEN, a critical 4th and 10... wtf didn't we call a time out???? I understand you need one for the fieldgoal unit but crap... if you get the ten yards on the first down... next play or two... throw it to someone and have them run it out of bounds and then bring on the field goal unit... it looked like sandlot ball when the pressure was on... :mad: just embarassing.. :mad: Lot of good or last time out (that we didn't use) does us now... :cussing: :frown:
 

BuddyLee

Football addict
AK-74me said:
How can they call Alstott in on that when he was stopped the only thing in was his fat head, then as he lays there he extends his arm out, and the clueless official falls for it after a huge delayed reaction. Mother effer.
Sounded like the officials screwed up on more than a few.
 

Larry Gude

Strung Out
I'm blind???

AK-74me said:
Funny he is blind to Ramsey though


I've said the same damn thing from day one;

WE DON'T KNOW ABOUT RAMSEY

WE DO KNOW ABOUT BRUNNEL

Would the 4th year breakout season rule of thumb apply to Ramsey, as it did Brunnel? We'll never know.

Would Ramsey play better with this years Skins, as Brunnel has? Only a blind person would think not.


Brunnel MERELY needs to run the offense as Gibbs wants; make the easy throws, meaning up to 60% completion or better and DON'T DO ANYTHING STUPID.

When he does, we're gold. When he doesn't, we're in trouble.

Every single post about Brunnel I've written noted what he did well or even great that day. I even shut up for three weeks while we lucked out against the Seahawks, blew the game vs. the Chiefs and basically folded against the Broncos.

I agonize as a fan, game after game being acutely aware of Brunnels weakness'. It's hard to watch him not be able to do what Ramsey can; throw it hard, with a snap of his wrist when he has to. It's hard to watch him just throw it into the 10th row when he can't find anyone.

Sonny Jergunson says the same thing every week for the last 20 years; You gotta throw a few deeps ones just so they A. know you can, and B, you might get a catch or a penalty and C. it's no worse than a punt.

Marks supposed strengths:

He can run: Well, with midseason fatigue at his age and a nagging injury, that's out the window. We've seen PAt get out of trouble a time or two.

Veteran decision making: I've seen him live vs. the Eagles make GREAT decisions. I've seen him throw that quick out enough to want to turn off the TV. He doesn't even LOOK because with his arm he HAS to throw it right away. Note to coachs; if he can't look and then throw it and still beat the corner back, they're GONNA jump the route. Where's the pump and go?

Mark is getting rid of the ball later and later. He is starting to take some wicked shots.

No bad mistakes: This is the worst, by far. He fumbles twice, TWO TIMES a game. We don't lose em all, but he puts it on the ground. He's gotten away with a fair number of balls thrown in to double coverage.

Add it all up, you've got a has been quarterback who has played well against every loser we've faced and has made enough mistakes to lose to the Chiefs, Broncos and Bucs, the better teams.

He's not going to get any better. Now, as he tires and gets more beat up, Ramsey has not been able to develop. Imagine how far wild games like yesterday go in the development of a young QB? He, Pat, gains nothing sitting and Mark gains nothing because he's already been there, done that and STILL didn't get it done.

The papers, and AK, are pointing out all the little things everyone else is doing that is causing losses and noting that if that guy or this guy had just made a play...

How about Mark making one more good one or one less bad one?

I don't care how you add it up:

Mark did NOTHING against the Bears.

He pulled out a miracle against Dallas.

His late pick should have sealed our fate against Seatle.

His fumbles cost us the Chiefs.

He didn't make ONE more last play against the Broncos.

He played great against the 49ers.

No one showed up for the Giants Wellington Wake.

His fumble at the end of the first half could have cost us the game save for Portis being heads up and running down Kearse.

He had two fumbles and two pics yesterday and looked like a lost rookie on the last two plays.

We could easily be 2-7 or even 1-7.

We are 5-4.

Anyone in here believe we're a 5-4 team?

Anyone in here think that if Pat played to this point you wouldn't be calling for 'ol Mark if we were 5-4 under him?

Blind. Yeah, I'm blind all right.

A guy getting to play and make the very mistakes that cost the other guy, supposedly, the job, game after game after game.

I call THAT blind.
 
Top