awpitt
Main Streeter
So we have JWs and Scientologists. Any other ones we should avoid?Scientology. Next.
So we have JWs and Scientologists. Any other ones we should avoid?Scientology. Next.
So we have JWs and Scientologists. Any other ones we should avoid?
So we have JWs and Scientologists. Any other ones we should avoid?
Exactly. What kind of religion brain washes its followers to refuse a simple medical treatment?
7th Day Adventist are a pretty quirky bunch. I worked at a hospital in Maine that was a 7th Day Adventist hospital. They don't eat meat (which is ok, I guess) but some of the other stuff They firmly believe that caffeine is a drug, pepper is drug :shrug: just to name a few. An they MUST thigth (sp) a certain percentage of their income to the church! No if, ands or buts about it. If you starve to death, so be it, but the church better get their money first, before anything.
I don't really think of a blood transfusion as a "simple" medical treatment.
I don't understand why some of you are so outraged by a personal decision that has absolutely NOTHING to do with you, and affects you in NO way. Why is it your business, or even newsworthy, that some woman died after refusing medical treatment?
Do you get this excited over "Do Not Resuscitate" orders?
Of course. Remember the Terri Schiavo discussions?
I'm reading a lot of judgement and very little respect or regard for faith or personal choice.
Relatively simple when compared to some other procedures out there.I don't really think of a blood transfusion as a "simple" medical treatment.
I don't have a problem with her having made a poor decision. It was heres to make. My issue is that she was brain washed, by the church, into making that poor decision. There is nothing in the Bible that says you're gonna go to hell if you accept blood transfusions.I don't understand why some of you are so outraged by a personal decision that has absolutely NOTHING to do with you, and affects you in NO way. Why is it your business, or even newsworthy, that some woman died after refusing medical treatment?
I look at this differently because DNRs are ussually the result of a well thoughout decision made ahead of time with specific giudelines as to when the DNR is to be excersised.Do you get this excited over "Do Not Resuscitate" orders?
I don't think anyone has any call to criticize this woman for her decision.
Not suggesting anyone avoid anything, but in the context of your question, some Christian Scientists believe that faith healing is the only way to go and their church promotes this. Back in the 80s there were a number of cases where devout Chrisitan Scientist parents let their children die because they did not let doctors treat them. They prayed for a healing miracle instead.So we have JWs and Scientologists. Any other ones we should avoid?
I look at this differently because DNRs are ussually the result of a well thoughout decision made ahead of time with specific giudelines as to when the DNR is to be excersised.
"A devout Jehovah's Witness died just hours after giving birth to twins - as her strict faith barred her from receiving a life-saving blood transfusion.
Despite desperate pleas from doctors, Emma Gough, 22, and her family, including her husband of nearly two years Anthony, 24, resolutely refused treatment.
The young mother had time to cradle her newborn twins, a boy and a girl, before falling unconscious from heavy blood loss."
Jehovah's Witness mother dies after refusing blood transfusion after giving birth to twins | the Daily Mail
I don't really think of a blood transfusion as a "simple" medical treatment.
I don't understand why some of you are so outraged by a personal decision that has absolutely NOTHING to do with you, and affects you in NO way. Why is it your business, or even newsworthy, that some woman died after refusing medical treatment?
Do you get this excited over "Do Not Resuscitate" orders?
I don't have a problem with her having made a poor decision. It was heres to make. My issue is that she was brain washed, by the church, into making that poor decision. There is nothing in the Bible that says you're gonna go to hell if you accept blood transfusions.
I look at this differently because DNRs are ussually the result of a well thoughout decision made ahead of time with specific giudelines as to when the DNR is to be excersised.
My issue is that she was brain washed, by the church, into making that poor decision. There is nothing in the Bible that says you're gonna go to hell if you accept blood transfusions.
Common sense.Brainwashed or enlightened? Who says it was a poor decision?
She and people like her believe that the Bible requires this. You don't. Who are you to say you are right and she is wrong?